Jump to content

Random Hockey Observations


Recommended Posts

Ball hockey can be extremely fun and a great workout if you guys never take things too seriously. The guys I used to play with were ultra competitive and it lost its "fun factor" when we would start to argue with each other. Just always remember its an in house league and you are not playing for anything other than bragging rights.
Ive played a ton of ball hockey in leagues over the last 15yrs. Some pretty competitive levels, but I too got sick of it once it got way too serious. Its great for cardio, and it can be a lot of fun, but too many of the leagues I played in are dirty/full of young "Joe Heavies" as we call them. Young kids who look for the fight/dirty play. I guess this happens in competitive ice too, but I wouldnt know, my ice hockey is pretty beginner-ish, and very non-contact for the most part. I find ball can be a lot more prone to dirty tactics and sucker punches.All that whining aside, I still try to play on 2 teams every season, 4 seasons a year. I love it.This summer, joined a new team who is all about the fun of playing and the beer afterwards in the parking lot, shooting the shit. I think we were like 3-9, missed the playoffs, but I had way more fun with them than my team in the winter that went to the finals. All about the guys your playing with, and the comraderie. At least for me.Have fun with it Coesillian.oh, and as an aside, one of my buddies I played with also refs a lot on ball/ice (part time linesman in the AHL too), and he recently reffed a game that featured Raffi Torres, David Clarkson, and a gtd whose name I cant recall. Another buddy played with Clarkson, didnt say the kindest things about him!
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 22.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • serge

    3931

  • Zach6668

    2871

  • digitalmonkey

    2649

  • MapleLeafpoker

    2008

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Taking Jin to his first NHL game Sunday. Seats close to the glass and I get to see McDavid. Probably the last game I see at The Joe.

I want Subban to win all the Norrises now.

vezina NOMINATION for Dev. **** yeahhhhhhhhhhhh. Going to vegas in June

Posted Images

Max Talbot handled playing with shoulder problems by collecting 4g/2a in the Stanley Cup Finals. The Pens were 4-0 in games in which he got at least a point.Marian Hossa handled playing with shoulder problems by collecting 0g/3a in the Stanley Cup Finals. The Wings were 1-1 in games in which he got at least a point.
Nope, I won't let it die.Blackhawks’ Hossa to undergo surgerymaryanne%20hossa.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a true Random Hockey Observation:Was at a Sports Authority at Sunrise, Florida today. They had only 2 rows of hockey jerseys. One row all Panthers, the other row....all Maple Leafs.The Leafs were $20 cheaper, $99.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, the 2009 Hockey Hall of Fame class was announced yesterday. Tony Amonte, Tom Barrasso, John Leclair, Frank Zamboni, and the 1998 US Women's Team. Adam Oates gets left out in the cold again, along with Pavel Bure, Phil Housley (seriously?), Dino Cicarelli (SERIOUSLY?), Dale Hunter and Bernie Nichols. I would have taken any name on that list over LeClair and Amonte (whom I both respect and believe deserve a place, just not ahead of any of the guys I mentioned and probably 5-6 guys I didn't). Barrasso is fringe for me, 2nd most wins ever by a US-born goalie, Vezina and Calder trophies (not to mention two Stanley Cups), I can see the selection, especially since it's been a while since a goalie was enshrined.

Link to post
Share on other sites
So, the 2009 Hockey Hall of Fame class was announced yesterday. Tony Amonte, Tom Barrasso, John Leclair, Frank Zamboni, and the 1998 US Women's Team. Adam Oates gets left out in the cold again, along with Pavel Bure, Phil Housley (seriously?), Dino Cicarelli (SERIOUSLY?), Dale Hunter and Bernie Nichols. I would have taken any name on that list over LeClair and Amonte (whom I both respect and believe deserve a place, just not ahead of any of the guys I mentioned and probably 5-6 guys I didn't). Barrasso is fringe for me, 2nd most wins ever by a US-born goalie, Vezina and Calder trophies (not to mention two Stanley Cups), I can see the selection, especially since it's been a while since a goalie was enshrined.
Isn't that the US Hall of Fame so not that meaningful ?
Link to post
Share on other sites
So, the 2009 Hockey Hall of Fame class was announced yesterday. Tony Amonte, Tom Barrasso, John Leclair, Frank Zamboni, and the 1998 US Women's Team. Adam Oates gets left out in the cold again, along with Pavel Bure, Phil Housley (seriously?), Dino Cicarelli (SERIOUSLY?), Dale Hunter and Bernie Nichols. I would have taken any name on that list over LeClair and Amonte (whom I both respect and believe deserve a place, just not ahead of any of the guys I mentioned and probably 5-6 guys I didn't). Barrasso is fringe for me, 2nd most wins ever by a US-born goalie, Vezina and Calder trophies (not to mention two Stanley Cups), I can see the selection, especially since it's been a while since a goalie was enshrined.
Uhh Adam that list was the US Hockey Hall of Fame lol.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Isn't that the US Hall of Fame so not that meaningful ?
Uhh Adam that list was the US Hockey Hall of Fame lol.
Oops, I totally missed that. Makes much more sense now.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Oops, I totally missed that. Makes much more sense now.
fwiw your reaction was the same as mine"seriously? these guys?"then I noticed the "US" part of it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
This seems like a standard question to ask around here when someone retires, but...Jeremy Roenick: Hall of Famer?
I don't think so but I hate the guy so I am a little biased. He had a good 3 year in Chicago where he scored over 100 points I think but other than that just a good player, but not great.
Link to post
Share on other sites
This seems like a standard question to ask around here when someone retires, but...Jeremy Roenick: Hall of Famer?
As Steve said, I dont think so either.In fact, more I think about it, based on traditional criteria, probably no chance. Never won a Cup, no awards (nothing I can think of), no scoring crowns.My favourite criteria for hall of fame is....was he one of the best players of an era. Or a time when he was one of the top 5/10players, say for a timeline of 3-5 yrs.I dont see how Roenick makes it to the hall frankly.And FWIW, I LOVED Roenick when he first came into the league, even had the Hawks jersey.
Link to post
Share on other sites
This seems like a standard question to ask around here when someone retires, but...Jeremy Roenick: Hall of Famer?
500+ goals and 1200+ points is pretty hard to turn your nose up at. Then again, Ciccarelli scored more goals in less games than Jari Kurri, Bryan Trottier or Ron Francis and he still isn't in, so it's obviously not the only criteria. I would have to say he probably won't make it unless there's a makeup year where a couple guys who were shut out of better Hall classes get in.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Any extra points given to him since he's one of the best American players (scorers, anyways) ever?
Possibly, he has better stats than Joe Mullen but also needed about 250 extra games to get them.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...