rocketpoker828 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Luckily for Ron, I did not find this at all amusing.Ruggedly smug Jon. Link to post Share on other sites
Ouch-8s 4 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Your argument has a significant flaw here. You claim that popularity has nothing to do with quality (a statement I won't go into) but that you set higher standards for things that are popular. Thus, every single time, if two things to you are of equal quality in absolute terms, clearly the one that is less popular is going to seem better to you. By letting your expectations and preconceived notions affect your thoughts on the quality of an entertainment experience, nothing you expect to be good will ever possibly be as good as something that you have no expectations about.In other words, stop putting the ***** on a pedestal. Am I allowed to find Bizzle funny? Link to post Share on other sites
keith crime 8 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 yeah but certain people love stuff until it becomes popularI love U2 - now everyone loves U2 - I hate U2See REM, Green Day, and just about any band that sells out and starts making horrible music - heh Link to post Share on other sites
renaedawn 1 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 you're wrongBwahahahahaha! I'm so wright. Link to post Share on other sites
SBriand 4 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Obviously you don't understand the threads in this personality or you'd realize there's no such thing as subjective. Everything is wright or rong.Yeah, I think, I mean, I know, you are right. Link to post Share on other sites
renaedawn 1 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 It would be like Sting leaving the Police and making nothing but dreary FM lite music for the rest of his life ... er ok forget thatHey, Fields of Gold was a beautiful song.You know I'm wright.Your argument has a significant flaw here. You claim that popularity has nothing to do with quality (a statement I won't go into) but that you set higher standards for things that are popular. Thus, every single time, if two things to you are of equal quality in absolute terms, clearly the one that is less popular is going to seem better to you. By letting your expectations and preconceived notions affect your thoughts on the quality of an entertainment experience, nothing you expect to be good will ever possibly be as good as something that you have no expectations about.In other words, stop putting the pussy on a pedestal.What's better than ruggedly handsome? Whatever it is, this is it's embodiment. Link to post Share on other sites
missIdaho 1 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Hey, Fields of Gold was a beautiful song.You know I'm wright.Sting could sing the alphabet and I'd still love him. Link to post Share on other sites
LadyGrey 6 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 What's better than ruggedly handsome? Whatever it is, this is it's embodiment.Swimmingly lycratastic? I don't know if that's better than ruggedly handsome, but it fits Bizzle like a glove. Link to post Share on other sites
mk 11 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 It would be like Sting leaving the Police and making nothing but dreary FM lite music for the rest of his life ... er ok forget that I pretty much have no problem with anything Sting's done. He was the walrus. Woulda been nice to catch a Police show sometime in my life, though. Link to post Share on other sites
mrdannyg 274 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Your argument has a significant flaw here. You claim that popularity has nothing to do with quality (a statement I won't go into) but that you set higher standards for things that are popular. Thus, every single time, if two things to you are of equal quality in absolute terms, clearly the one that is less popular is going to seem better to you. By letting your expectations and preconceived notions affect your thoughts on the quality of an entertainment experience, nothing you expect to be good will ever possibly be as good as something that you have no expectations about.In other words, stop putting the pussy on a pedestal.nice use of big words. i actually claimed the opposite though - that i still worked under the impression that popularity and quality are related, even though that might be flawed. it follows that if popularity and quality are positively related, then things that are popular have a higher standard of quality and will, on average, be of higher quality. therefore it is correct to expect higher quality of things of high popularity. Link to post Share on other sites
LadyGrey 6 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Sting could sing the alphabet and I'd still love him.There's the difference between you and me. Sting could permanently eradicate poverty, disease and bad hair days and I would still detest him.I pretty much have no problem with anything Sting's done. He was the walrus. Woulda been nice to catch a Police show sometime in my life, though.My respect for your taste in music just went from hereto here. Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,219 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Chris, will you please just explain how Williams ruined Politically Incorrect and/or link me to the Simmons article where he mentions it?I tried to youtube the clips but work keeps getting in the way.I just scoured his page on ESPN.com and I couldn't find his NFL picks column from October 13th. It wasns't in the archives or on his home page.Its a mystery.anyway, Robin Williams was on the show, doing his thing, talking over everyone, doing silly voices, making hand gestures while other people were talking. When Bill went to do his mid show bit with the pictures or props, RW led into it and chewed up some of the time, and Bill was visibly irritated. He was gonna scrap the bit, but RW felt sorta bad and promised to be quiet during it. He reluctantly did it, it fell flat due to the build up, and it not being a slam dunk bit.In Simmons 10/13 pics article, if I remember correctly, Simmons said something "blank person is ruining their season faster than RW wrecked Bill Maher's show on Friday"Happy? Now go comb your jewfro Link to post Share on other sites
LadyGrey 6 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Happy? Now go count your shekelsFYP, just felt like it. Link to post Share on other sites
KDawgCometh 2 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 I don't need your Bill Hicks guilt trip rantI like Denis Leary and I'm ok with thatnow let me sleep in the same bed with you when I come to Chicago?I'm makin the rounds too. I'm sleepin in the tiki roomI'm sleepin in Mike's guest houseRhinestone's garageKeith's mom's room, if she'll have me.on Lefty's couch:cryingsadface: again, I get denied for being in chicagoso, I provide everyone with this Link to post Share on other sites
mk 11 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 My respect for your taste in music just went from here. Oh. Drag? I could write you a detailed 10k word essay on why he's great. But I really couldn't care less. My taste in music is pretty specifically defined at this point. I know exactly what I like and what I don't like. Link to post Share on other sites
Ouch-8s 4 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Swimmingly lycratastic? I don't know if that's better than ruggedly handsome, but it fits Bizzle like a glove. That started off a little slow, but then finished with a Bang! Link to post Share on other sites
missIdaho 1 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 There's the difference between you and me. Sting could permanently eradicate poverty, disease and bad hair days and I would still detest him.is that the only difference? damn Link to post Share on other sites
LadyGrey 6 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 so, I provide everyone with thisA good example of cameltoe? Thanks, it's just what I always wanted. Link to post Share on other sites
KDawgCometh 2 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 A good example of cameltoe? Thanks, it's just what I always wanted.i thought of you when I posted it Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Mexico 4,219 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 edit - you are wrong about one thing. i wouldn't think quickly enough to ask her if she had any friends. then again, i wouldn't date anyone who was friends with such a spineless poser.so trueLuckily for Ron, I did not find this at all amusing.yeah, oknice use of big words. i actually claimed the opposite though - that i still worked under the impression that popularity and quality are related, even though that might be flawed. it follows that if popularity and quality are positively related, then things that are popular have a higher standard of quality and will, on average, be of higher quality. therefore it is correct to expect higher quality of things of high popularity.its hard to believe girls don't throw the pussy at you on a daily basis instead of rocks:cryingsadface: again, I get denied for being in chicagoso, I provide everyone with thishey, at least I'll be in your house. I'll moan extra loud so you can hear me. When I'm finished, I'll come and spoon with youthis girls belly is a tad flabbyit may be a man Link to post Share on other sites
rocketpoker828 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 this girls belly is a tad flabbyI was thinking the same thing. Althought girls with a little meat on them is +EV. Link to post Share on other sites
Ouch-8s 4 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 I was thinking the same thing. Althought girls with a little meat on them is +EV. Yeah, I always thought Thai Ladyboys were supposed to be hot... This one not so much. Link to post Share on other sites
CardWarfare 4 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 Maybe you shouldn't have called C-Dubb a "stupid Asian motherfucker."I believe it was "dumb gook bitch" actually, but who am I to split hairs. Thick, black, asian hairs.morninglove the new sig CWKnew you would.i guess i just don't like things that are repetitive, unoriginal, and hugely popular. it's clear you've never listened to radiohead.Smuggedly rug.Convo between MDG and typical girlGirl- HelloMDG- oh, you still say hello? So uncool. I don't use that anymore, I've come up up my own greeting. Girl- um, ok, what is it?MDG- slaffengreetnickGirl- well, Slaffengreetnick to youMDG- now you're just a poser, go watch Seinfeld, effin hussy. Got any friends?I guffawed. I actually had started thinking something a lot these lines reading that convo, but not this good. Link to post Share on other sites
mrdannyg 274 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 its hard to believe girls don't throw the pussy at you on a daily basis instead of rocksi know, can you believe it? with my perfectly (albeit misunderstood) logical arguments, and homestarrunner quotes, i can't believe i don't have a harem of girls, bringing me beer and grapes, and taking care of my many Sterrances.fwiw - i'm not usually like this. i only do it here because you guys have to listen to me. or at least i can pretend you do, and that you don't skip over anything longer than two sentences. Link to post Share on other sites
Bizzle 0 Posted October 18, 2006 Share Posted October 18, 2006 nice use of big words. i actually claimed the opposite though - that i still worked under the impression that popularity and quality are related, even though that might be flawed. it follows that if popularity and quality are positively related, then things that are popular have a higher standard of quality and will, on average, be of higher quality. therefore it is correct to expect higher quality of things of high popularity.It took me a while for me to come up with a response here, because you so clearly missed my point in the first post. I literally said nothing about the relation between popularity and quality, other than I didn't want to discuss it, but somehow you completely missed that. And since you completely disagree with my entire point of view here, might as well go the whole way.When you have sex for the first time, it will be over quickly and you will think, "what's the big deal?" When you have sex the second time, you will think, "HOLY SHIT!" I'll give you a hint: the fact that it lasted 10 seconds instead of 5 the second time isn't the only difference. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now