daniel plays 100/100

[zedd2005 0]

First of all you are all complete morons.Second of all you all should know that when I said drawing dead I obviously meant he was drawing very f u c k i n g slim. (Btw' date=' why are you all such wimps that this forum has to be censored) Another thing is there is no way he could win on the next card' date=' he had to hit something runner runner. He CALLS on the flop with a runner runner, calls on the turn in 3rd pair, then PUSHES into someone who is OBVIOUSLY going to call.[/color']Another thing I am only 19 years old, and have made over $100,000 playing poker. So guess what all you f u c k e n fish. I am ahead of where Daniel stood at my age. Of course what drawing dead is probably true, I could contribute a lot to this forum if I didn't bash Daniel, which I don't. I merely said look at this 15 hands and how someone can lose that amount of money and consider them a pro. Now, daniel is obviously a pro, but that right there is not professional play. I play 100/200 and 50/50 NL on occassion, but I never get wasted and go blow $2k in $200 NL. That is irresponsible. but honestly Daniel the poker community at pokerroom would like to thank you for your contributions to our little charity. You beefed up the wallets of a few fish maybe I can take their money. And please, send a PM next time you are going to play NL when you are drunk in a bar. I would be more than happy to alleviate you of your money, as in watching this whole game, you never got your money in with the best once.And you all morons go say oh hes not drawing dead he's just needs running kings. Are you out of your f u c k i n g mind!? I would LOVE TO PLAY YOU. Because if you say oh hes not drawing dead he needs running kings, ahahahhahah thats the funniest thing I have ever read.And for those of you morons who say I bet you wish you could blow through $70k in a day and not care. I made $45k playing poker this month, how much did you make?Man I can't wait till Dreamclown busts him. Or reztes. Anyone really on pokerroom Stoxtrader obviously pwns him.And for the idiot who says he wasn't playing seriously. Well of course he wasn't you wouldn't see someone play hold em for the first time play this bad. But isn't that the definition of a big fish? Someone who plays horribly? Who cares if he was serious enough, he is still the biggest fish to ever play 100/100 NL on the internet. Show these HH to anyone and ask if they have seen someone play worse at $10k NL.Daniel will never ever go bust playing poker.although i have to admit the bits in red are pretty true. but still........ ure a twat. and also, ......Ok, so you are a really cool 19 yr old poker phenom...and you have played in a casino or online for how long?...when you have had the grass grow in your yard for a few more summers and you CONTINUE to win at poker, THEN you will have my respect...but to bash someone in a forum hidden behind your computer in your mother's basement, bragging about your financial successes...GROW UP!!! let me explain something to you...people who have it, don't talk about it...if you don't know what I mean in this statement my point is made

i dont get it. you quoting me or mr jones and also, are you referring to me as the 19yr oldor mr jones, cos im 22...........

[mosheh 0]

daniel plays 100/100 Thu, Jan 5th, 2006 11:15 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANTES/BLINDS Asiandude7 posts blind ($50), stoxtrader4 posts blind ($100). PRE-FLOP KidPoker bets $300, sindy2 bets $950, Asiandude7 folds, stoxtrader4 folds, KidPoker calls $650. FLOP [board cards AD,KD,6S ] KidPoker checks, sindy2 bets $1,425, KidPoker calls $1,425. TURN [board cards AD,KD,6S,9D ] KidPoker checks, sindy2 bets $7,325 and is all-in, KidPoker calls $7,325. RIVER [board cards AD,KD,6S,9D,2H ] SHOWDOWN sindy2 shows [ AS,AC ] KidPoker shows [ 9S,KS ] sindy2 wins $19,548. Apparently a giant reraise preflop doesn't mean AA KK or AK to daniel, No hes gonna call with bottom 2. because hes a fish! ANTES/BLINDS BeanZo posts blind ($50), KidPoker posts blind ($100). PRE-FLOP sindy2 folds, stoxtrader4 bets $300, Gimp84 folds, Asiandude7 folds, BeanZo folds, KidPoker bets $750, stoxtrader4 calls $550. FLOP [board cards 3D,QD,4C ] KidPoker bets $900, stoxtrader4 calls $900. TURN [board cards 3D,QD,4C,AD ] KidPoker bets $1,400, stoxtrader4 calls $1,400. RIVER [board cards 3D,QD,4C,AD,7C ] KidPoker checks, stoxtrader4 checks. SHOWDOWN KidPoker shows [ 6C,9C ] stoxtrader4 shows [ AS,KS ] stoxtrader4 wins $6,347. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANTES/BLINDS BeanZo posts blind ($50), CrackerKid0 posts blind ($100). PRE-FLOP KidPoker bets $300, sindy2 folds, stoxtrader4 calls $300, Asiandude7 bets $1,300, lent53- folds, BeanZo folds, CrackerKid0 folds, KidPoker calls $1,000, stoxtrader4 folds. FLOP [board cards 3C,2S,3D ] KidPoker checks, Asiandude7 bets $1,234, KidPoker bets $2,468, Asiandude7 bets $1,415.50 and is all-in, KidPoker calls $181.50. TURN [board cards 3C,2S,3D,QS ] RIVER [board cards 3C,2S,3D,QS,AS ] SHOWDOWN Asiandude7 shows [ QC,QH ] KidPoker shows [ 5S,5D ] Asiandude7 wins $8,346. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANTES/BLINDS CrackerKid0 posts blind ($50), KidPoker posts blind ($100), Dontbetmeplz posts blind ($100). "PRE-FLOP sindy2 folds, stoxtrader4 calls $100, Gimp84 folds, Asiandude7 folds, Dontbetmeplz bets $250, lent53- folds, BeanZo folds, CrackerKid0 folds, KidPoker bets $500, stoxtrader4 calls $500, Dontbetmeplz calls $250. FLOP [board cards 8C,9D,6H ] KidPoker bets $600, stoxtrader4 calls $600, Dontbetmeplz folds. TURN [board cards 8C,9D,6H,7C ] KidPoker bets $2,200, stoxtrader4 calls $2,200. RIVER [board cards 8C,9D,6H,7C,5H ] KidPoker bets $7,450 and is all-in, stoxtrader4 calls $7,450. SHOWDOWN KidPoker shows [ JC,KC ] stoxtrader4 shows [ 9H,AH ] stoxtrader4 wins $11,173.50, KidPoker wins $11,173.50. look at how "sick" that call was, top pair only with four to the straight. Daniel needed some help on the river to split this one "DN doesn't call with top pair but he bet with top pair HE WAS AHEAD and there were not 4cards that follow and stoxtrader4 is lucky on the river

[JSHamm 9]

Ok, my intention wasn't to bash Daniel. More to just post some humorous HH's from his NL game. Sure I said some mean sh1t about him but what the heck? I'm sure he can take it.Dreamcaster, that theory has come across and I will direct you now to a message board where we discussed it, but it's not a possibility. http://www.totalbluff.com/forums/viewtopic...der=asc&start=0Read those threads I won't type my reason why it isn't buying customers just more of a drunken guy having some fun playing some cards.Secondly I have posted at Totalbluff this. I know Daniel is one of the best players in the world. but as of right now he is the biggest fish on the site. It doesn't matter of your skill potential in considering one to be a fish it matters in your actual play. Now if you ask Stoxtrader, who the biggest fish he has ever played at 50/100 NL is he will say Daniel Negreanu. No one has ever dumped $70k in that game before, playing like that. No one. Daniel has lost about $70k on the site out of his own pocket. No one has ever accomplished that, either. So yes, Daniel is the biggest fish that has played on pokerroom, regardless of how good he is. That doesn't actually matter, it just matters how he played his sessions, he chose to play like a moron, he knew he was playing like a moron, he didn't care. Great.This brings me to another point in how good of players these 50/100 NL players really are. I think Daniel was a bit shell shocked to see some of the amazing calls these guys made. He has posted when he buys into live $3k games and runs the table over they lay hands down to him, he hits his draws. Well, here in this, these guys knew what was going on and broke him on every all in he made, he didn't get his money in with the best hand for more than $5k once. They actually owned him, and sure he was playing like a donk, but I doubt he was attempting to lose money, he was probably just trying to run the table over and pick up pots, he found he was getting stone cold called by A high. Something he might not be used to.

So why not just post it like this from the beginning instead of coming off as a condescending prick? Also, just be honest about it; your intention was to bash Daniel. I really don't care, but if you're going to do it at least stick by it.

[MrJones 0]

Hopefully DN will read this thread and you two can play a little HU 100-100 NLHE together, I'm sure he'll pay you for the lessons.Someone please post when this match gets set up, should be a good one.

Sorry for calling you all morons but when did I say I would play Daniel 100/100 HU!? I would never play Daniel 100/100 HU for this reason. He is better than me at NL. I would gladly sit down at a full table with him playing 100/100 if he was playing like he did last night. But he would have his pride to lose if he played me HU for $10k. So he would play his best. His best > my best.

[MrJones 0]

My intention was a humorous post and to see if you people could actually defend Daniel after this display of horrible poker for vast sums of money. I also wanted to see which idiots would respond to my drawing dead comment. because it's widely accepted in the poker world that when you are drawing to running cards, or half outs, saying someone is drawing dead, is a perfectly acceptable way to put it. Or some might say drawing virtually dead. Whats the difference.But yeah, lets face it, I do enjoy bashing Daniel from time to time. He enjoys bashing one of my old poker playing "friends" why not take a stab at him to. Like I said, I'M SURE, hes not offended.

[Staynerjohn 0]

First of all you are all complete morons.Second of all you all should know that when I said drawing dead I obviously meant he was drawing very f u c k i n g slim. (Btw' date=' why are you all such wimps that this forum has to be censored) Another thing is there is no way he could win on the next card' date=' he had to hit something runner runner. He CALLS on the flop with a runner runner, calls on the turn in 3rd pair, then PUSHES into someone who is OBVIOUSLY going to call.[/color']Another thing I am only 19 years old, and have made over $100,000 playing poker. So guess what all you f u c k e n fish. I am ahead of where Daniel stood at my age. Of course what drawing dead is probably true, I could contribute a lot to this forum if I didn't bash Daniel, which I don't. I merely said look at this 15 hands and how someone can lose that amount of money and consider them a pro. Now, daniel is obviously a pro, but that right there is not professional play. I play 100/200 and 50/50 NL on occassion, but I never get wasted and go blow $2k in $200 NL. That is irresponsible. but honestly Daniel the poker community at pokerroom would like to thank you for your contributions to our little charity. You beefed up the wallets of a few fish maybe I can take their money. And please, send a PM next time you are going to play NL when you are drunk in a bar. I would be more than happy to alleviate you of your money, as in watching this whole game, you never got your money in with the best once.And you all morons go say oh hes not drawing dead he's just needs running kings. Are you out of your f u c k i n g mind!? I would LOVE TO PLAY YOU. Because if you say oh hes not drawing dead he needs running kings, ahahahhahah thats the funniest thing I have ever read.And for those of you morons who say I bet you wish you could blow through $70k in a day and not care. I made $45k playing poker this month, how much did you make?Man I can't wait till Dreamclown busts him. Or reztes. Anyone really on pokerroom Stoxtrader obviously pwns him.And for the idiot who says he wasn't playing seriously. Well of course he wasn't you wouldn't see someone play hold em for the first time play this bad. But isn't that the definition of a big fish? Someone who plays horribly? Who cares if he was serious enough, he is still the biggest fish to ever play 100/100 NL on the internet. Show these HH to anyone and ask if they have seen someone play worse at $10k NL.Daniel will never ever go bust playing poker.although i have to admit the bits in red are pretty true. but still........ ure a twat. and also, ......Ok, so you are a really cool 19 yr old poker phenom...and you have played in a casino or online for how long?...when you have had the grass grow in your yard for a few more summers and you CONTINUE to win at poker, THEN you will have my respect...but to bash someone in a forum hidden behind your computer in your mother's basement, bragging about your financial successes...GROW UP!!! let me explain something to you...people who have it, don't talk about it...if you don't know what I mean in this statement my point is made

i dont get it. you quoting me or mr jones and also, are you referring to me as the 19yr oldor mr jones, cos im 22...........

No zedd...you are ok...I was speaking about Mrs. Jones ...sorry about the confusion

[zedd2005 0]

First of all you are all complete morons.Second of all you all should know that when I said drawing dead I obviously meant he was drawing very f u c k i n g slim. (Btw' date=' why are you all such wimps that this forum has to be censored) Another thing is there is no way he could win on the next card' date=' he had to hit something runner runner. He CALLS on the flop with a runner runner, calls on the turn in 3rd pair, then PUSHES into someone who is OBVIOUSLY going to call.[/color']Another thing I am only 19 years old, and have made over $100,000 playing poker. So guess what all you f u c k e n fish. I am ahead of where Daniel stood at my age. Of course what drawing dead is probably true, I could contribute a lot to this forum if I didn't bash Daniel, which I don't. I merely said look at this 15 hands and how someone can lose that amount of money and consider them a pro. Now, daniel is obviously a pro, but that right there is not professional play. I play 100/200 and 50/50 NL on occassion, but I never get wasted and go blow $2k in $200 NL. That is irresponsible. but honestly Daniel the poker community at pokerroom would like to thank you for your contributions to our little charity. You beefed up the wallets of a few fish maybe I can take their money. And please, send a PM next time you are going to play NL when you are drunk in a bar. I would be more than happy to alleviate you of your money, as in watching this whole game, you never got your money in with the best once.And you all morons go say oh hes not drawing dead he's just needs running kings. Are you out of your f u c k i n g mind!? I would LOVE TO PLAY YOU. Because if you say oh hes not drawing dead he needs running kings, ahahahhahah thats the funniest thing I have ever read.And for those of you morons who say I bet you wish you could blow through $70k in a day and not care. I made $45k playing poker this month, how much did you make?Man I can't wait till Dreamclown busts him. Or reztes. Anyone really on pokerroom Stoxtrader obviously pwns him.And for the idiot who says he wasn't playing seriously. Well of course he wasn't you wouldn't see someone play hold em for the first time play this bad. But isn't that the definition of a big fish? Someone who plays horribly? Who cares if he was serious enough, he is still the biggest fish to ever play 100/100 NL on the internet. Show these HH to anyone and ask if they have seen someone play worse at $10k NL.Daniel will never ever go bust playing poker.although i have to admit the bits in red are pretty true. but still........ ure a twat. and also, ......Ok, so you are a really cool 19 yr old poker phenom...and you have played in a casino or online for how long?...when you have had the grass grow in your yard for a few more summers and you CONTINUE to win at poker, THEN you will have my respect...but to bash someone in a forum hidden behind your computer in your mother's basement, bragging about your financial successes...GROW UP!!! let me explain something to you...people who have it, don't talk about it...if you don't know what I mean in this statement my point is made

i dont get it. you quoting me or mr jones and also, are you referring to me as the 19yr oldor mr jones, cos im 22...........

No zedd...you are ok...I was speaking about Mrs. Jones ...sorry about the confusion

:-)

[RuffRidr 0]

Another thing I am only 19 years old, and have made over $100,000 playing poker. So guess what all you f u c k e n fish. I am ahead of where Daniel stood at my age.

You're only 19?!? Wow, I would have never guessed that with all of the maturity you've been displaying in these posts.SW!--RuffRidr

[gilbertology 0]

My intention was a humorous post and to see if you people could actually defend Daniel after this display of horrible poker for vast sums of money. I also wanted to see which idiots would respond to my drawing dead comment. because it's widely accepted in the poker world that when you are drawing to running cards, or half outs, saying someone is drawing dead, is a perfectly acceptable way to put it. Or some might say drawing virtually dead. Whats the difference.But yeah, lets face it, I do enjoy bashing Daniel from time to time. He enjoys bashing one of my old poker playing "friends" why not take a stab at him to. Like I said, I'M SURE, hes not offended.

Humorous post, lol. At first you tried to be serious, you saw you were in way over your head, and finally came to the realization that: Numero uno - daniel was drunk at a bar with neverwin and lindgreen playing the highest stakes game he could find on the internet. You as a professional, have probably never gotten drunk and donked off five buy-ins right. I know I have, albeit at lower limits.Secondly, to you this is a lot of money and I'm sure you dropped a deuce in your pants when Daniel left the table and you couldn't get any of the "easy" money, but you have to earn it, boy. Daniel could care less about 70k, hes been stuck a mil in the big game, and regularly takes on 300k losses and wins in the that game. He also took DC for 150k, then promptly lost 130k back on a rush, but he did not care because that is chump change to him. Who even knows if he lost more than 20k? Since he was sittin with the gambling edog, a drunk lindgreen could've blown off 30k and a sober neverwin 20k.Number 3 - Neverwin your hero lost the same amount not being drunk and trying his hardest against dreamclown at 500/1000, I'm sure that kind of money means a great deal to him(sw).4 - Your a douchebag, go clean up your pants now. - Nostradamus, HAIL VICTORY!

[gilbertology 0]

My intention was a humorous post and to see if you people could actually defend Daniel after this display of horrible poker for vast sums of money. I also wanted to see which idiots would respond to my drawing dead comment. because it's widely accepted in the poker world that when you are drawing to running cards, or half outs, saying someone is drawing dead, is a perfectly acceptable way to put it. Or some might say drawing virtually dead. Whats the difference.But yeah, lets face it, I do enjoy bashing Daniel from time to time. He enjoys bashing one of my old poker playing "friends" why not take a stab at him to. Like I said, I'M SURE, hes not offended.

Humorous post, lol. At first you tried to be serious, you saw you were in way over your head, and finally came to the realization that: Numero uno - daniel was drunk at a bar with neverwin and lindgreen playing the highest stakes game he could find on the internet. You as a professional, have probably never gotten drunk and donked off five buy-ins right. I know I have, albeit at lower limits.Secondly, to you this is a lot of money and I'm sure you dropped a deuce in your pants when Daniel left the table and you couldn't get any of the "easy" money, but you have to earn it, boy. Daniel could care less about 70k, hes been stuck a mil in the big game, and regularly takes on 300k losses and wins in the that game. He also took DC for 150k, then promptly lost 130k back on a rush, but he did not care because that is chump change to him. Who even knows if he lost more than 20k? Since he was sittin with the gambling edog, a drunk lindgreen could've blown off 30k and a sober neverwin 20k.Number 3 - Neverwin your hero lost the same amount not being drunk and trying his hardest against dreamclown at 500/1000, I'm sure that kind of money means a great deal to him(sw).4 - Your a douchebag, go clean up your pants now. - Nostradamus, HAIL VICTORY!

[gilbertology 0]

Oh yeh, forgot to mention the fact that you posted the EXACT same rhetoric and hand histories on different message boards and didn't say anything about just kidding around, means you were not trying to be humorous at all. You're just a lurking 19 year-old little kiddie troll. Kiddie games are in Africa folks, kiddie games in Africa. At least graduate from college and earn 200k in real money before you start sh<i>i</i>t talking someone else's drunk play. Oh yeh, and be old enough to drink lil boy.

[Pokerdad2222 0]

My intention was a humorous post and to see if you people could actually defend Daniel after this display of horrible poker for vast sums of money. I also wanted to see which idiots would respond to my drawing dead comment. because it's widely accepted in the poker world that when you are drawing to running cards, or half outs, saying someone is drawing dead, is a perfectly acceptable way to put it. Or some might say drawing virtually dead. Whats the difference.But yeah, lets face it, I do enjoy bashing Daniel from time to time. He enjoys bashing one of my old poker playing "friends" why not take a stab at him to. Like I said, I'M SURE, hes not offended.

You seem like an intelligent kid who knows his way around a poker game and feels stupid because he posted somehting in which it was blatanly obvious that Daniel was not playing seriously. No one here defended his plays because they all know he was just having some fun and messing around. You didnt post this for humor. You posted this to bash him and came to your senses and realized it was pretty stupid. You brag that you made 100k playing poker last year at 19. I could find 100 just like you in 10 minutes. You also said you lsot 50k in one day. Keep playing wiht that much in one day and let me know when you go broke. You sound to me like a kid who could contribute something here but decides to be a punk ass instead. Congratulations. You have gained nothing and you just openly admitted that you are bashing someone who you know would own you at the table. I am not bashing you, I am basically just telling you to grow up. Listen to DrawingDead. Quit being a Di..ick and be mature. Im sure you would learn somethings along the way. You can shoose to continue and feel cool by being an internet bully if you like, because, as we both know, that is really cool and you wil popular for doing so. Have a good dayand make sure you only act like this behind the computer screen because if you did this at a live game wiht me it would not be fun for you.E

[MrJones 0]

I never would have guessed anyone in this forum was over the age of 18 by their unrelenting support of a TV poker player, censoring of swear words, and idiocy displayed in their posts, but hey, ya learn something new every day.I would like to take this time to thank Mr. Negreanu, he is drawing masses of players to the pokerroom skin now. These HH hit the web people might want a piece of the action, soon we might get a 50/100 regular game running again...And to the last poster.. My HERO NEVERWIN!? I never spoke to him nor do I care about him at all. Where do you get that from.The post was meant to be humourous, if you can't laugh at one of the top 20 players in the world losing $70k and the top online players licking their lips the whole time, what can you laugh at? $10k UTG with K2 off. Picked off by QQ. It's funny shit man.

[mk 11]

Only decent response I got. And when did you play with me / under what name? In a tournament or something?

Hmm, is it because you were paid a compliment? Go fishing for ego massage somewhere else. It's annoying. You're proud of yourself. We get it.Have a cookie.Oh, also, please post when your ego causes you to go broke. Thank you.

[mk 11]

My intention was a humorous post and to see if you people could actually defend Daniel after this display of horrible poker for vast sums of money.

70k ceased being a vast sum of money to Daniel when you were 10.Good luck.

[PAYforUSC 0]

think of it as the clowncash giveawaySWOP is A cummmrag

[MrJones 0]

No on other message boards people have the perception to know its funny, ie. my post on Neverwin, garners this response from Get Crunk:

hahahah i cant believe those hands thats one of the funniest things i've ever seen... will be interesting to see how quickly the table fills up next time he sits... over under 6 minutes. (im betting under)

And drawing deads response was the only mature response to my post. Which is a serious post, but also hilarious that someone will play poker that way for that sum of money. He was right. I'm not being a punk ass, or whatever, some people would appreciate reading this HH and find it entertaining, I posted it for people to read, I just threw a dig in at daniel at the end and you all go nuts.

[mk 11]

$10k UTG with K2 off. Picked off by QQ. It's funny censored man.

Yes, and DN was laughing harder than anyone.

[CrazyEyez 0]

Another thing I am only 19 years old, and have made over $100,000 playing poker. So guess what all you f u c k e n fish. I am ahead of where Daniel stood at my age.

You're only 19?!? Wow, I would have never guessed that with all of the maturity you've been displaying in these posts.SW!--RuffRidr

His avatar tells me everything i need to know...

[MrJones 0]

Not only was he the worst player I have ever seen at 100/100. He is going for the worst player I have ever seen. I don't know if he is drunk or if he just doesn't care, but I personally know that many players walked away up $30k of his money.

See I said I don't know if he is drunk or doesn't care. Maybe I should have phrased my statements differently in the, which I read because I didn't think I was that berrating and in fact I wasn't. I should have said, Daniel played the fishiest session of 100/100 NL I have ever seen, not Daniel is the biggest fish I have ever seen. Which works to because a fish can be the most skilled player at the table, but if he chooses to play like a fish, he becomes one. My logical approach to this thread and it's responses is going to beat out your idiotic out cries of support for this millionaire who chooses to donk off a lot of money to good online players.

[PA32R 0]

MrJones posts about daniel constantly.Either here or on NWP.It's sad how being envious can cause such jealousy.

It's sad how baldness can cause such lack of hair too.

[PAYforUSC 0]

PLEASE TAKE OFF YOUR FUR COAT MR. BERKOWITZ. PLEASE.

[MikeJohnson724 0]

Not only was he the worst player I have ever seen at 100/100. He is going for the worst player I have ever seen. I don't know if he is drunk or if he just doesn't care, but I personally know that many players walked away up $30k of his money.

See I said I don't know if he is drunk or doesn't care. Maybe I should have phrased my statements differently in the, which I read because I didn't think I was that berrating and in fact I wasn't. I should have said, Daniel played the fishiest session of 100/100 NL I have ever seen, not Daniel is the biggest fish I have ever seen. Which works to because a fish can be the most skilled player at the table, but if he chooses to play like a fish, he becomes one. My logical approach to this thread and it's responses is going to beat out your idiotic out cries of support for this millionaire who chooses to donk off a lot of money to good online players.

I think its true what you say and people need to get a sense of humor. I understand you respect daniel, but when he plays like a donk, you're going to call him out on it. No big deal, that's part of poker ladies and gents.

[PAYforUSC 0]

[FlyerFan9 0]

I can't get enough of that