howdyo 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 How about this for Mr. Tritz.Case closed.http://www.billrini.com/index.php/2005/09/...-is-not-rigged/ This case will never be closed.It's like the questions of chicken and egg or if there's God. It's forever debating.Online pokers can never be proofed not rigged.Bump.Bump.Bump.Bump.Bite me! Link to post Share on other sites
zimmer4141 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 God, this thread should be buried. It has very little comical value found in JFarrel's legendary threads. Please never do this again, and let this whole forum forget about this atrocity. Link to post Share on other sites
Nickoli 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 How about this for Mr. Tritz.Case closed.http://www.billrini.com/index.php/2005/09/...-is-not-rigged/ This case will never be closed.It's like the questions of chicken and egg or if there's God. It's forever debating.Online pokers can never be (I no speaky the English) not rigged.Bump.Bump.Bump.Bump.Bite me!FYP Link to post Share on other sites
iveyfan30 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 bumpwhy??? Link to post Share on other sites
Jeepster80125 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 bumpwhy???I was gonna ask the same, except both of us just shot the damn thread back to the top of the heap. Once it gets ignored for more than twenty minutes it'll die. Hopefully forever. Link to post Share on other sites
KTW 0 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 Obviously it is not "rigged" because each player is an individual perse` and noone gains anything and if it was "rigged" it would be 100% obvious and the "truth" would have been discovered YEARS ago.However :1. Does each RNG "react,respond,compute,work" the same? Of course not and that I see as a factor that has some players upset so to speak.2. Compare Bodog or Doyles various sites to Ultimate Bet. It doesnt take a genius or an analysis of 100,000+ hands to figure out they are VERY different as far as "what the outcome will be". When you see FH over Flush over set over set every few minutes at those sites and not on UB, then?3. To sum it all up. Are any of the "Major and well known" sites rigged? NO! Link to post Share on other sites
aadams_22 3 Posted September 30, 2005 Share Posted September 30, 2005 bump Link to post Share on other sites
duece7bum 0 Posted October 1, 2005 Share Posted October 1, 2005 bump That is ****in great!!! Link to post Share on other sites
howdyo 0 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 bump Go ahead, baby killer, but online poker is still rigged. Link to post Share on other sites
stealfromblind 0 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 johnny cash is the man Link to post Share on other sites
ncperrotta069 0 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 *** SUMMARY ***Board [2c 9d 9h 2s 4s]Seat 1: dmbjosh (small blind) showed [Jc Jh] and lost with two pair, Jacks and NinesSeat 2: matermoh (big blind) folded on the FlopSeat 4: Chaaaaaaa showed [2d 2h] and won ($4100) with four of a kind, DeucesSeat 8: zenith1347 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Link to post Share on other sites
Iwu4u 0 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 i call bullshit because you have hella programs open and one of them appears to be paint. I think your the one rigging shit around here. Link to post Share on other sites
CJHunt 0 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 DIE SHITTY THREAD!!! DIE!!! Link to post Share on other sites
finztotheleft 0 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 I'm sorry, but I can not allow this thread to die yet. Because of the above September bumps, I have spent the hours trying to read through all of this. I immediately noticed a problem and had to plow through those posts to make sure it wasn'tI want to direct everyone's attention to another inconsistency with the screenshots. In the first hand, the J9 hand.....at the middle, right side of the screen there is a current deck statistics area. The first shot shows the J9 in his hand on the table and 9J9 as his hand under pot odds. In current deck statistics we see the J, 9, and 9 faded out to show they are in play. The other 2 flop cards are not faded out. The second hand was the quad 9 hand. His hand on the table is 92. The hand listing under the pot odds says 92K9996. Would it be normal for the program to show his best 5 card hand or all 7 available cards ? The only numbers faded out on the current deck statistics area are the 92. Thought I'd give the conspiracy theorists something else to ponder.......***********************************************************************and a message for Pogue......the professor in the pokerroom with the lead pipe line was hysterical ! . Link to post Share on other sites
howdyo 0 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 I'm sorry, but I can not allow this thread to die yet. Because of the above September bumps, I have spent the hours trying to read through all of this. I immediately noticed a problem and had to plow through those posts to make sure it wasn'tI want to direct everyone's attention to another inconsistency with the screenshots. In the first hand, the J9 hand.....at the middle, right side of the screen there is a current deck statistics area. The first shot shows the J9 in his hand on the table and 9J9 as his hand under pot odds. In current deck statistics we see the J, 9, and 9 faded out to show they are in play. The other 2 flop cards are not faded out. The second hand was the quad 9 hand. His hand on the table is 92. The hand listing under the pot odds says 92K9996. Would it be normal for the program to show his best 5 card hand or all 7 available cards ? The only numbers faded out on the current deck statistics area are the 92. Thought I'd give the conspiracy theorists something else to ponder.......***********************************************************************and a message for Pogue......the professor in the pokerroom with the lead pipe line was hysterical ! .How can you not? Link to post Share on other sites
finztotheleft 0 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 .How can you not?Ummm....it's easy Link to post Share on other sites
aadams_22 3 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Hey JWeb...do us a favor and lock this thread. Link to post Share on other sites
aadams_22 3 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Hey JWeb...do us a favor and lock this damn thread. Link to post Share on other sites
Frisco d’Anconia 0 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Hey JWeb...do us a favor and lock this thread.Yeah, I'm sick of people bumping it hours after the last post. :roll: Link to post Share on other sites
aadams_22 3 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Why in the hell did it post twice? Link to post Share on other sites
jlgosse 0 Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Just noticed this thread was bumped again, and I was analyzing the pictures that the OP posted.The cards that are "coming" are clearly doctored. I noticed that the pixel-width between each "card" is slightly off (the shit in the top right corner of each image).Not that I'm god for noticing this like 2 months late, but it's pretty obvious now that I look at it. Link to post Share on other sites
finztotheleft 0 Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Just noticed this thread was bumped again, and I was analyzing the pictures that the OP posted.The cards that are "coming" are clearly doctored. I noticed that the pixel-width between each "card" is slightly off (the censored in the top right corner of each image).Not that I'm god for noticing this like 2 months late, but it's pretty obvious now that I look at it.I think there are a lot of issues with the quality of the screenshots. I wasted hours reading through this whole thing because posters I like/respect were defending the OP despite obvious indications that the screenshots were editted. After in depth coverage of the clock issue, ad nauseum, now no one is responding to the actual evidence. Why not ? Link to post Share on other sites
zimmer4141 0 Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Please kill this thread.+1 Link to post Share on other sites
Bluffs2005 0 Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Die. Thread. Die. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts