brvheart 1,752 Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 I said so amazing in there, didn't I?Of course I watch tv and movies, that's the labour of my people.sonofabitch Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 sonofabitchCanadian Sleeper Cell Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 Canadian Sleeper Cell At least we don't let them on our hit TV shows...Moonwalking, doing the robot dance and singing a deliberately woeful version of Avril Lavigne's "Complicated" on TV's "Canadian Idol."Is that part of the profile of an alleged homegrown terrorist?Police won't confirm it is, but that was the picture being presented to Canadians in reports on one of three men accused of plotting attacks in the nation's capital.The picture that emerged Thursday of Khurram Sayed Sher was one of stark contrasts.The comic performance and an alleged terrorist."It's sort of absurd. It is a little weird," Jake Gold, a judge on "Idol" and music manager in Toronto, said of the allegations."He was a funny guy. At the same time, it's not a laughing matter."Sher, the alleged terrorist, is a father of three, a doctor who graduated from one of Canada's most prestigious medical schools, and an avid hockey player.He is someone police said conspired with others in a Canadian bomb plot, but also a doctor who went to Pakistan to help after an earthquake. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 18, 2010 Share Posted October 18, 2010 Well I absentee voted last night, 3 times. My son in law let me vote for him, and the wife.Voted no on 19 three items.If it fails by 1-3 votes, your welcome hippy freaks! Link to post Share on other sites
CaneBrain 95 Posted October 18, 2010 Share Posted October 18, 2010 Well I absentee voted last night, 3 times. My son in law let me vote for him, and the wife.Voted no on 19 three items.If it fails by 1-3 votes, your welcome hippy freaks!voter fraud is probably the only way you can stop this train. even if it fails now, it is only a matter of time. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 18, 2010 Share Posted October 18, 2010 voter fraud is probably the only way you can stop this train. even if it fails now, it is only a matter of time.That and the federal government telling the voters of California that national drug laws supersedes all state drug laws and they will still prosecute fully all pot casesAnd the fact that most pot heads are too stoned to vote, let alone be registered. Link to post Share on other sites
dapokerbum 0 Posted October 18, 2010 Share Posted October 18, 2010 That and the federal government telling the voters of California that national drug laws supersedes all state drug laws and they will still prosecute fully all pot casesAnd the fact that most pot heads are too stoned to vote, let alone be registered.Too bad Pot Heads aren't the only ones that want to see this legalized ... Link to post Share on other sites
strategy 4 Posted October 18, 2010 Share Posted October 18, 2010 Well I absentee voted last night, 3 times. My son in law let me vote for him, and the wife.Voted no on 19 three items.If it fails by 1-3 votes, your welcome hippy freaks!disappointing Link to post Share on other sites
CaneBrain 95 Posted October 18, 2010 Share Posted October 18, 2010 That and the federal government telling the voters of California that national drug laws supersedes all state drug laws and they will still prosecute fully all pot casesSure they will. Maybe starting in 2016 if the GOP finds someone to run who can walk and chew gum at the same time. Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 18, 2010 Share Posted October 18, 2010 Sure they will. Maybe starting in 2016 if the GOP finds someone to run who can walk and chew gum at the same time.Why should the republicans have higher standards than the democrats?Besides being superior in all other areas I mean? Link to post Share on other sites
vbnautilus 48 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 Well I absentee voted last night, 3 times. My son in law let me vote for him, and the wife.Voted no on 19 three items.If it fails by 1-3 votes, your welcome hippy freaks!I hope this was one of those ballots where voting NO means you support the legalization. You really can never tell by reading the text on the ballot, so it takes a good deal of research beforehand. Something tells me you just quickly checked the NO box and lit a cigar. Link to post Share on other sites
strategy 4 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 kansas' gay marriage ban was like that. I think I voted against it, but it's entirely possible that I unintentionally voted pro-bigotry. Link to post Share on other sites
hblask 1 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 "Do you not want to not avoid voting not to make it no longer not illegal to possess marijuana?" Link to post Share on other sites
custom36 4 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 That and the federal government telling the voters of California that national drug laws supersedes all state drug laws and they will still prosecute fully all pot cases...and you support this? What happened to the whole "states should be able to govern themselves" motto? This is an honest question - I don't understand Republican support for this idea. Or did you guys cover this months ago? Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted October 19, 2010 Share Posted October 19, 2010 ...and you support this? What happened to the whole "states should be able to govern themselves" motto? This is an honest question - I don't understand Republican support for this idea. Or did you guys cover this months ago?I am cool with states rights argument.But what about Nevada? If you legalize pot in CA, and we start shipping in trucks full of it from Mexico, how do you control the spread into neighboring states like Nevada?You in essence make Nevada have to pay for more enforcement costs because of our actions. Doesn't Nevada have a right to be in the argument? this makes it a federal issue.The Feds making this statement is just that, a clear statement that their rules apply here. How does one state have the right to tell all other states that their rules trump the feds rules? What if California said that there would no longer be any restrictions on air pollution? That effects more than California, that's why the feds step in.Here is a story about the Obama administration's stanceI'm against pot being legal but I don't think the world will end if it does. I suspect it will be made legal in my lifetime nationwide.But it is going to create problems people are not thinking about. From driving under influence, to taxes, to enforcement of no smoking laws etc.Doesn't matter what we vote anyway, one judge will overturn it and do what they want. Has happened for the last 3-4 big social issue propositions here, and it will happen for this one too. Link to post Share on other sites
SAM_Hard8 50 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 Legalize it and tax the shit out of it.Marijuana Crushes Grapes as Cash Crop Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 Really, really disappointed that Holder (and therefore Obama) have stated that they'll enforce drug policy in California even if Californians vote to legalize the marijuana plant. And that can in the same week that Obama said he's fight the judge who was trying to end Don't ask-Don't tell. Is he actively trying to lose my support? These are among the easiest issues he'll face. Link to post Share on other sites
CaneBrain 95 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 Really, really disappointed that Holder (and therefore Obama) have stated that they'll enforce drug policy in California even if Californians vote to legalize the marijuana plant. And that can in the same week that Obama said he's fight the judge who was trying to end Don't ask-Don't tell. Is he actively trying to lose my support? These are among the easiest issues he'll face.He knows that repealing DADT will have much more force and legitimacy if it comes from congress instead of the courts. It looks dumb but it is the right move; I dont doubt at all that he wants to repeal it.No idea why they are changing their pot policy all of a sudden but I'm not surprised, sadly. Link to post Share on other sites
CaneBrain 95 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 I know BG, it's CNN but the author is a Republican:http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/10/21/wood...dex.html?hpt=C1"Why Conservatives Should Favor Legalizing Marijuana" Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 I know BG, it's CNN but the author is a Republican:http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/10/21/wood...dex.html?hpt=C1"Why Conservatives Should Favor Legalizing Marijuana"I'll beat BG to the punch.The author teaches at the U of British Columbia which means only one thing. He's a pot head hippy. Link to post Share on other sites
hblask 1 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 Conservatives on legalization! Link to post Share on other sites
mk 11 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 I'll beat BG to the punch.The author teaches at the U of British Columbia which means only one thing. He's a socialist pot head hippy.You're: almost getting it. Link to post Share on other sites
CaneBrain 95 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 Conservatives on legalization!no you tube at work....cliff notes? Link to post Share on other sites
Skeleton Jelly 2 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 no you tube at work....cliff notes?Sarah Palin is in favor of legalizing, which makes her hotter.I didn't watch it; I just browsed some comments. Link to post Share on other sites
CaneBrain 95 Posted October 21, 2010 Share Posted October 21, 2010 Sarah Palin is in favor of legalizing, which makes her hotter.I didn't watch it; I just browsed some comments.ok, I saw that before. If I remember right, she says she is not in favor of legalization but supports the idea that if police want to ignore recreational pot use and focus on other things, that is fine. So, she is a decriminalization proponent (and she admits to having used pot before).It made me dislike her slightly less. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now