Jump to content

Cheating At Wcoop Main Event


Recommended Posts

The link is actually in German.. But this site is supported by PokerStars.http://www.intellipoker.com/articleshow.php?id=869
Scandal with the WCOOP Main Event? - winner account is checkedUnrest and much gossip prevail to time under the Pokerspielernin the on-line scene. According to rumors the Englishman Mark playedTelt (photo), Runner UP with the CEPT Barcelona open in September, theWCOOP Main Event on passed Sunday with PokerStars under five differentNicknames. Among them also the winner account TheV0id, which belongsofficially to its wife. During the tournament it had given alreadynumerous speculations, who hides itself behind the account, because itwas the first tournament that TheV0id on PokerStars ever played.Mark of TeltscherBei PokerStars is forbidden to Marks it having morethan one account per person and Telt plays under the name play2kill.Altogether even five accounts under the same IP address are to havealong-played. PokerStars closed and checks allegedly for the timebeing all accounts at present, how one is to proceed further.The Pokeranbieter proceeds very strictly against this Unsitte. Onlysome weeks ago several accounts were closed, since these wereconsistently exchanged among the professional players, in order toconfuse the opponents on highest limit. A possible punishment would for example be to take The V0idsubsequently from the tournament. Thus all other players would upwardmove a position and the new winner would be ka$ino. PokerStars so far officially only mentioned that all accounts, whichparticipated in the Main Event are checked. This is already final withexception of the winner account. For the status of these safetydeterminations however still no official statement can be deliveredaccording to PokerStars.
Link to post
Share on other sites

he has 5 accounts that he plays under at different times or he was registered in the tournaments under 5 accounts like zee?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Scandal with the WCOOP Main Event? - winner account is checkedUnrest and much gossip prevail to time under the Pokerspielernin the on-line scene. According to rumors the Englishman Mark playedTelt (photo), Runner UP with the CEPT Barcelona open in September, theWCOOP Main Event on passed Sunday with PokerStars under five differentNicknames. Among them also the winner account TheV0id, which belongsofficially to its wife. During the tournament it had given alreadynumerous speculations, who hides itself behind the account, because itwas the first tournament that TheV0id on PokerStars ever played.Mark of TeltscherBei PokerStars is forbidden to Marks it having morethan one account per person and Telt plays under the name play2kill.Altogether even five accounts under the same IP address are to havealong-played. PokerStars closed and checks allegedly for the timebeing all accounts at present, how one is to proceed further.The Pokeranbieter proceeds very strictly against this Unsitte. Onlysome weeks ago several accounts were closed, since these wereconsistently exchanged among the professional players, in order toconfuse the opponents on highest limit. A possible punishment would for example be to take The V0idsubsequently from the tournament. Thus all other players would upwardmove a position and the new winner would be ka$ino. PokerStars so far officially only mentioned that all accounts, whichparticipated in the Main Event are checked. This is already final withexception of the winner account. For the status of these safetydeterminations however still no official statement can be deliveredaccording to PokerStars.
Upon the winning, Englishman Mark played Telt was heard to exclaim: "All your chips are belong to us!"yo
Link to post
Share on other sites
Scandal with the WCOOP Main Event? - winner account is checkedUnrest and much gossip prevail to time under the Pokerspielernin the on-line scene. According to rumors the Englishman Mark playedTelt (photo), Runner UP with the CEPT Barcelona open in September, theWCOOP Main Event on passed Sunday with PokerStars under five differentNicknames. Among them also the winner account TheV0id, which belongsofficially to its wife. During the tournament it had given alreadynumerous speculations, who hides itself behind the account, because itwas the first tournament that TheV0id on PokerStars ever played.Mark of TeltscherBei PokerStars is forbidden to Marks it having morethan one account per person and Telt plays under the name play2kill.Altogether even five accounts under the same IP address are to havealong-played. PokerStars closed and checks allegedly for the timebeing all accounts at present, how one is to proceed further.The Pokeranbieter proceeds very strictly against this Unsitte. Onlysome weeks ago several accounts were closed, since these wereconsistently exchanged among the professional players, in order toconfuse the opponents on highest limit. A possible punishment would for example be to take The V0idsubsequently from the tournament. Thus all other players would upwardmove a position and the new winner would be ka$ino. PokerStars so far officially only mentioned that all accounts, whichparticipated in the Main Event are checked. This is already final withexception of the winner account. For the status of these safetydeterminations however still no official statement can be deliveredaccording to PokerStars.
- Adam Mark
Link to post
Share on other sites
i was going to make the same joke again, but its not at all funny, and i'm pretty sure and tiny amount of funniness from my first joke would be completely lost.
0 for 3.
Link to post
Share on other sites
None, but please don't misspell my name.Mr. Marco
Certainly about time, Mr. Sparco. I see you've been sleuthing lately. No doubt gathering vital information for your onslaught. That's fair. Anyway, back to topic.To expound, basically you're saying that having no accounts is better than having 5 accounts because cheaters never prosper and are eventually caught and penalized. However, by paying closer attention to details (not unlike name spelling) one could surmise that blatantly disregarding rules has no excuse in this game and thus the said account should be banned from playing at pokerstars ever again.Quite harsh, Mr. Sparco, but your conservative views are not without merit.I will further review pele_br's response shortly.Thank you once again for eventually taking part and I hope your next response is as fresh as this.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Polo...
ahhhhh...pele_br. I've seen your response and it is certainly as titillating as Mr. Sparco's.To help us all understand, you are saying that one cannot turn a blind eye much like the blinded marco vs polo pool games children love so much during summer breaks. I see you've taken a much softer route; however, in that polo constantly calls out to marco reminding him of his whereabouts and the direction he should partake. Yours is a message of guidance vs punishment. The liberal tone of your message is a strong one in that compassion is our greatest measure of humanity. While you do agree that repercussions are necessary, the eventual outcome varies from Mr. Sparco's in the severity of its sentence.Excellent analysis pele_br. This is shaping up to be a quite formidable discussion.Mr. Sparco, your response.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...