Jump to content

Are The Greats Really That Great?


Recommended Posts

I know Doyle Brunson and Stu Ungar are considered the best to ever play, winning back to back wsop but there wasn't even 100 people in the event back then! I've won several tourney's with more people than that. Doyle makes plays that boggles the mind, all-in on the crappiest of hands. I think Sammy Farha is the best I've seen, really has a feel for players hand strengths.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I know Doyle Brunson and Stu Ungar are considered the best to ever play, winning back to back wsop but there wasn't even 100 people in the event back then! I've won several tourney's with more people than that. Doyle makes plays that boggles the mind, all-in on the crappiest of hands. I think Sammy Farha is the best I've seen, really has a feel for players hand strengths.
Doyle who? Stu what? Those people are all silly wannabes. You are the greatest ever. You've won tourneys with more than 100 people? Teach me your ways, oh master of the NLHE tourney.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is Water wet???Is it true if you dont use it, you'll lose it ???What is the Meaning of Life???Figured i would just ask some pointless questions......P.S. Ali is the greatest, and to answer your question, yes he really is that great.........

Link to post
Share on other sites
Why is Water wet???Is it true if you dont use it, you'll lose it ???What is the Meaning of Life???Figured i would just ask some pointless questions......P.S. Allah is the greatest, and to answer your question, yes he really is that great.........
Link to post
Share on other sites
I know Doyle Brunson and Stu Ungar are considered the best to ever play, winning back to back wsop but there wasn't even 100 people in the event back then! I've won several tourney's with more people than that. Doyle makes plays that boggles the mind, all-in on the crappiest of hands. I think Sammy Farha is the best I've seen, really has a feel for players hand strengths.
Nah, they're not really that great.Doyle is especially overrated.SW, fucking morons.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I know Doyle Brunson and Stu Ungar are considered the best to ever play, winning back to back wsop but there wasn't even 100 people in the event back then! I've won several tourney's with more people than that. Doyle makes plays that boggles the mind, all-in on the crappiest of hands. I think Sammy Farha is the best I've seen, really has a feel for players hand strengths.
I love how people form an opinion of someone like Doyle Brunson by the small % of hands shown on television in tournaments. He's only been a winning player for like 60 years. But once on ESPN WSOP he made a bluff and got caught. Yea your right. He must not be that good
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam, "I have a bottom pair(2s) with weak kicker(3), a backdoor flush and a backdoor straight draw, I call. Oh wow, I won the pot, I'm a genius."People, "look at Sammy, he's one of the true gamblers left, willing to call in in with anything. Man I envy that guy, he's an awesome poker player."Unknown Donk, "I have bottom pair(2s) with weak kicker(3), a backdoor flush and a backdoor straight draw, I call. Oh wow, i won the pot, I'm a genius."People, "WHAT A F#$KING DONKEY $@# MOVE, I'M GOING TO KILL YOU!!!!"

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sam, "I have a bottom pair(2s) with weak kicker(3), a backdoor flush and a backdoor straight draw, I call. Oh wow, I won the pot, I'm a genius."People, "look at Sammy, he's one of the true gamblers left, willing to call in in with anything. Man I envy that guy, he's an awesome poker player."Unknown Donk, "I have bottom pair(2s) with weak kicker(3), a backdoor flush and a backdoor straight draw, I call. Oh wow, i won the pot, I'm a genius."People, "WHAT A F#$KING DONKEY $@# MOVE, I'M GOING TO KILL YOU!!!!"
i agree with you somewhat, the only difference is that sammy doing stuff like that really builds an image for himself that people will remember. Avg donk online has no such motive. That being said, it is stupid people say he's one of the "last true gamblers" because of this.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I love how people form an opinion of someone like Doyle Brunson by the small % of hands shown on television in tournaments. He's only been a winning player for like 60 years. But once on ESPN WSOP he made a bluff and got caught. Yea your right. He must not be that good
No, he's good, not saying that, but alot of their tricks are out of the hat when you observe how they play a hand based on what the hole cards are. Phil Ivey said TV has hurt his ability to make alot of moves that he use to do.
Link to post
Share on other sites
No, he's good, not saying that, but alot of their tricks are out of the hat when you observe how they play a hand based on what the hole cards are. Phil Ivey said TV has hurt his ability to make alot of moves that he use to do.
Poor Phil, seems like he can't seem to win anymore now that his "tricks" are out of the bag.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Why is Water wet???Is it true if you dont use it, you'll lose it ???What is the Meaning of Life???Figured i would just ask some pointless questions......P.S. Ali is the greatest, and to answer your question, yes he really is that great.........
Hey Genius, Don't lower yourself to the rest of these yahoo's. The question may be a tad bit silly but do not be like the rest of these mindless hacks who live to flame. Sincerely.............................God
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...