Jennifer Harman 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Daniel won the poll so they are playing right now at the Wynn.I don't think it's being played in the Poker Room. Fox Sports is going to make it an hour show. Not sure when it will air.Jennifer Harman Link to post Share on other sites
iveyfan30 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Daniel won the poll so they are playing right now at the Wynn.I don't think it's being played in the Poker Room. Fox Sports is going to make it an hour show. Not sure when it will air.Jennifer Harmangood deal..thx for the heads up jen Link to post Share on other sites
zimmer4141 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Man, you're good at this. You should take over for Travis. If this whole gambling thing doesn't work out, he is paying $20 per hout I hear :)P.S. Very good chapter in SS2. Link to post Share on other sites
DCSports92GSR 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 8) 8) Link to post Share on other sites
Marc-O 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Jennifer Harmen ?A member of FCP ? nice... :-) Link to post Share on other sites
ronikazi 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Thanks for the update Jen, this should make for some pretty good tv Link to post Share on other sites
Waffles2003 1 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 love the pic Jen, too bad we are both married, J/K Link to post Share on other sites
pokepoke1967 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Jennifer, darling, you need to get your post count up. Daniel is going to be throwing in a dollar per post at his new poker site. That's what I've heard anyway. Link to post Share on other sites
skits2 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 When did the match start? Is Travis going to be updating the chip counts? Link to post Share on other sites
closetwin 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Wow, I've never seen you post before, Jennifer Harman.Completely realising that you likely won't read this, and understanding I look like a dork to the regs, I would like to say:The limit section in Super System 2 was the most enlightening thing I have ever read about limit hold 'em. Of course, I don't follow your word as gospel, but the way you laid out the principles of limit hold 'em in the text was the best treatise I have ever read on the topic of succeeding in limit hold 'em.Thanks for writing it.CT Link to post Share on other sites
Bluffs2005 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Daniel won the poll so they are playing right now at the Wynn.I don't think it's being played in the Poker Room. Fox Sports is going to make it an hour show. Not sure when it will air.Jennifer HarmanWelcome Jen!!! You almost make me want to tone down my Avatar..... Link to post Share on other sites
njtitans16 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 why dont you all stalk her already. Link to post Share on other sites
closetwin 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 why dont you all stalk her already.We have great respect for someone who has proved herself to be one of the world's best players. She plays in the big game....she is regarded as one of the best ever poker players.Why does it seem odd to you that we are excited to have her post here? Do you feel a strange tension because she is a woman? As if all of the posters here are inherently male in your mind, because of some strange, psychological fixation?We are words appearing on a screen. The judgments you make reflect your own warped psychosis more than they reflect us at all.Furthermore, if it is because people have commented on her looks - well, she is a good looking woman. Many people can accept this, and speak of it, without the red-faced embarassment of a schoolboy. See, she IS a good-looking woman, and she knows it as well as anyone who remarks upon it.Grow up.CTEDIT: I just wanted to add: Jennifer's picture reminds of Beatles posters. I mean, let's say genders were reversed and I was younger than I am. Let's say I am a fourteen year old girl, and poker is as rock music was in the 1960's. Jennifer is (roles are reversed, remember) the dashing image of John Lennon, smiling down from his poster, while I experience his craft as near the pinnacle of achievement.In this twisted, hypothetical case, I am swooning as Jennifer walks by. Yes, I am drawing strange lines between chronological occurences in popular culture! CAN YOU HANDLE THAT? It makes SENSE! Link to post Share on other sites
njtitans16 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 We have great respect for someone who has proved herself to be one of the world's best players. She plays in the big game....she is regarded as one of the best ever poker players.Why does it seem odd to you that we are excited to have her post here? Do you feel a strange tension because she is a woman? As if all of the posters here are inherently male in your mind, because of some strange, psychological fixation?We are words appearing on a screen. The judgments you make reflect your own warped psychosis more than they reflect us at all.Furthermore, if it is because people have commented on her looks - well, she is a good looking woman. Many people can accept this, and speak of it, without the red-faced embarassment of a schoolboy. See, she IS a good-looking woman, and she knows it as well as anyone who remarks upon it.Grow up.CTi have a great amount of respect for harman and think she's a great player and a good looking woman too. but people calling her darling, and getting all googly eyed as i can imagine... yea thats a little over the line. Link to post Share on other sites
solo319 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Thank you Jen Do you like my mustache? ITS NIce! Link to post Share on other sites
closetwin 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 but people calling her darling, and getting all googly eyed as i can imagine... yea thats a little over the line. I never realised "darling" was an insult. That's horrendous.However, I must remind you that you "imagining" people becoming "googly eyed" is simply your own neurotic brain causing you to jump to strange and psychotic conclusions.Please seek help. Please.CT Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I never realised "darling" was an insult.It's a little condescending, kitten. Link to post Share on other sites
njtitans16 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 darling. do you really think she wants to be called that. i dont want to speak for her but comon. and some of these guys are drooling over her, you can tell when they post. Link to post Share on other sites
Suited_Up 2 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Wow, I've never seen you post before, Jennifer Harman.Completely realising that you likely won't read this, and understanding I look like a dork to the regs, I would like to say:The limit section in Super System 2 was the most enlightening thing I have ever read about limit hold 'em. Of course, I don't follow your word as gospel, but the way you laid out the principles of limit hold 'em in the text was the best treatise I have ever read on the topic of succeeding in limit hold 'em.Thanks for writing it.CTI think you'd be surprised. She's responded in the past I believe, and one of the few FTP pro's that will have a conversation with people. Link to post Share on other sites
closetwin 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I never realised "darling" was an insult.It's a little condescending, kitten.No, you're right. It is condescending. It's a chauvanistic thing to say. I apologize to the original poster that brought it up, as twisted as he is. I still stand by my theory that he's reading WAY too much into it.For instance, I don't recall once reading "darling" in any post within this thread. if anyone did say this, in a condescending manner, then fuck 'em.I didn't read anyone for this sort of chauvanistic behaviour. If it occurred and I missed it, again...you know...fuck 'em.CT Link to post Share on other sites
mark33f 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 In terms of Daniel vs. Howard...Howard is the better commentator. Link to post Share on other sites
pokepoke1967 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Why is it condescending when a man uses the term, but not when a women uses it. That's stupid. Do you not sense the tongue-n-cheek, I suggested that she increase her post count so that she can get the dollar per post that some people imagine is going to be given away at DN's new poker site. Do you get that? A dollar per post! Does anyone have a sense of irony around here? Does JH need an extra dollar at a poker site? Link to post Share on other sites
UnionGuy 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I thought I'd seen some stupid threads, but I think this one takes the cake. To think I almost spent time telling the guys over on the "Raymer is better than Doyle" thread they were stupid.Personally, I get more googly eyed over Smash than Hartman. That's just me. Link to post Share on other sites
Manihack 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I thought I'd seen some stupid threads, but I think this one takes the cake. To think I almost spent time telling the guys over on the "Raymer is better than Doyle" thread they were stupid.Personally, I get more googly eyed over Smash than Hartman. That's just me.Hahahah. Link to post Share on other sites
MarkZ 0 Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Thank you Jen Do you like my mustache? ITS NIce!Ha, I love Borat! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now