Cnn Vs Fox News

[LongLiveYorke 38]

If by "we", you mean "the advocates of endless government expansion being continually promoted without challenge", then I'd have to agree with you, although it's probably due as much to the internet as to FOX.

Wait, are you saying that Fox news is against endless government expansion being continually promoted without challenge? They are certainly against government expansion caused by Democrats. When it's done by Republicans, they're more than willing to be patriots who support the president.

[vbnautilus 48]

I don't know what these viewership numbers are suppose to be meaning. I feel like the subtext when these things are posted is that they reflect something about the way the general public feels... but that is obviously biased by the fact that people who are unhappy are going to seek out this form of entertainment and those that are happy will not. I'm pretty sure if we look at conservative vs liberal TV over the long run it will fluctuate with more viewership for the party that is out of power.

[brvheart 1,752]

I don't know what these viewership numbers are suppose to be meaning. I feel like the subtext when these things are posted is that they reflect something about the way the general public feels... but that is obviously biased by the fact that people who are unhappy are going to seek out this form of entertainment and those that are happy will not. I'm pretty sure if we look at conservative vs liberal TV over the long run it will fluctuate with more viewership for the party that is out of power.

Then you haven't been paying attention since Fox News' inception.

[hblask 1]

Wait, are you saying that Fox news is against endless government expansion being continually promoted without challenge? They are certainly against government expansion caused by Democrats. When it's done by Republicans, they're more than willing to be patriots who support the president.

Yeah, you're right. I probably should never defend FOX because I don't really like them. I like the idea that the traditional all-left networks have a challenger, but I still disagree with much of the standard line on FOX.

[CaneBrain 95]

Then you haven't been paying attention since Fox News' inception.

Or you don't understand that total viewership of liberal news is greater than that of Fox News......but Fox News has better ratings because they have a monopoly on conservative news programming.My guess is the above.

[SweetDee 0]

Or you don't understand that total viewership of liberal news is greater than that of Fox News......but Fox News has better ratings because they have a monopoly on conservative news programming.My guess is the above.

Actually, it's nowhere close. Just going off that one day your looking at roughly 16 million to maybe 4? Liberal news can't buy viewers while anything FOX touches grows in leaps and bounds. As far as monopoly, that's one way of looking at it, another way is FOX fills a massive void. It's not like MSNBC, CNN, etc. couldn't change programming if they wanted too. They could, they just have a not so hidden agenda, and just like certain Dems they are determined to go down with this ship.

[85suited 0]

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/rating...r_11_154974.aspThe Scoreboard: Thursday, Mar. 11By Kevin Allocca on Mar 12, 2010 05:43 PM25-54 demographic: (L +SD)Total day: FNC: 413 | CNN: 117 | MSNBC: 109 | HLN: 131Prime: FNC: 643 | CNN: 158 | MSNBC: 224 | HLN: 129 Data by Nielsen Media Research. Live and same day (DVR) data. Total Viewers: (L +SD)Total day: FNC: 1574 | CNN: 441 | MSNBC: 391 | HLN: 317 Prime: FNC: 2676 | CNN: 737 | MSNBC: 820 | HLN: 531

[brvheart 1,752]

Or you don't understand that total viewership of liberal news is greater than that of Fox News......but Fox News has better ratings because they have a monopoly on conservative news programming.My guess is the above.

You're incorrect, and I've provided data. Can you?ps. I never watch any TV news.

[Balloon guy 158]

Or you don't understand that total viewership of liberal news is greater than that of Fox News......but Fox News has better ratings because they have a monopoly on conservative news programming.My guess is the above.

Most people get their news from local news, probably more apolitical than anything national.Liberals make up most of their facts so they don't need to 'watch the news' to know that Bush lied

[CaneBrain 95]

Most people get their news from local news, probably more apolitical than anything national.Liberals make up most of their facts so they don't need to 'watch the news' to know that Bush lied

No you just had to be alive. Good point.I dont know anyone who watches the local news anymore. Most people get their news from the internet, old man.

[ShakeZuma 585]

Not fox news but it's the AP vs CNN. two subjects, four articles, quite a bit of difference in reporting:http://money.cnn.com/2010/09/30/news/econo...ndex.htm?hpt=T2vs.http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gdpand then, the even better example:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100930/ap_on_...igning_congressvs. http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/30/con...dex.html?hpt=T2

[strategy 4]

http://money.cnn.com/2010/09/30/news/econo...ndex.htm?hpt=T2vs.http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gdp

I CANNOT RUN WORSE.

[Pot Odds RAC 23]

Not fox news but it's the AP vs CNN. two subjects, four articles, quite a bit of difference in reporting:http://money.cnn.com/2010/09/30/news/econo...ndex.htm?hpt=T2vs.http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gdpand then, the even better example:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100930/ap_on_...igning_congressvs. http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/30/con...dex.html?hpt=T2

Pretty good examples.

[mk 11]

Pretty good examples.

Of what, exactly?CNN sugar-coating? Is that what you're looking for?Hey guys, I just started a new news website: http://www.dogsinduds.com/My business model is simply to siphon viewers from Fox News.

[Pot Odds RAC 23]

Of what, exactly?

...quite a bit of difference in reporting

Seriously, was it that complicated?

[mk 11]

Seriously, was it that complicated?

The headlines are different. The content of the articles is nearly identical in both cases, with the same quotes being used multiple times.You have a problem with the AP's headlines because they frame the articles in a more negative light, correct?I REPEAT: http://www.dogsinduds.com/ THIS SITE HAS ALL THE BEST STORIES AND HEADLINES

[Skeleton Jelly 2]

Hey guys, I just started a new news website: http://www.dogsinduds.com/

Hmm. I'm intrigued, but what I'm really looking for is the premier online repository for pictures of dogs in bee costumes.

[mk 11]

Also, Dear ShakeZuma:WILCO SUCKS AND I HATE YOU

[strategy 4]

more evidence of headline bias at CNN

[Balloon guy 158]

Cnn is stupid

[Skeleton Jelly 2]

Strategy knows what's what.

[ShakeZuma 585]

Also, Dear ShakeZuma:WILCO SUCKS AND I HATE YOU

HATAZ GONE HATE

[Balloon guy 158]

CNN, the bastion of protecting Obama from any bad press:

Tens of thousands of low-income workers lost their jobs Thursday as a stimulus-subsidized employment program came to an end.

Oh, just tens of thousands?Wait, no it's actually 250,000.When have you heard a quarter of a million described as 10's of thousands before?and these aren't real jobs anyway, they are low paying jobs, so no big deal.We will count them in his favor when describing the new jobs, but when they are cut we will pretend that they don't really matter.

[CaneBrain 95]

Shake, I have read those two articles and the differences are negligible at best. Heck, the yahoo one even noted that more people approve of congressional Dems than GOPers.The CNN articles seemed maybe 5% more generous to the democrats. At most.

[ShakeZuma 585]

wait, are you serious?