Jump to content

The World's Worst "erotica"


Recommended Posts

you'd think so, but you won't be laughing when she goes all quadraphonic on your simian."poor george. he's not so curious anymore..."
Brilliant.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I think he said it best when he said, "Yikes."For example, see here:“Girls, you will never walk into any garden and see any self-respecting flower chasing the bees. Picture that. They won’t do it. They know enough to stay right where they’re planted, and they blossom, and have a sweet fragrance that comes from within. The bees will come to them. Oh my, how they’ll come.“Yikes. Sounds like someone chased that bee metaphor all the way to orgasm.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Girls, you will never walk into any garden and see any self-respecting flower chasing the bees.
Upon further review, this is just such an awesome statement. "Self-respecting flower."Are there flowers that have self-esteem problems? Are there slutty flowers?And if there are slutty flowers, shouldn't those be the flowers you bring on a first date?
Link to post
Share on other sites
Upon further review, this is just such an awesome statement. "Self-respecting flower."Are there flowers that have self-esteem problems? Are there slutty flowers?And if there are slutty flowers, shouldn't those be the flowers you bring on a first date?
I'm partial to flowers with daddy issues.
Link to post
Share on other sites
“Girls, you will never walk into any garden and see any self-respecting flower chasing the bees."
Okay, I mean, I hate to be a stickler, but this metaphor makes little sense. Flowers are simultaneously male and female; they have both organs. So, unless this advice is aimed at hermaphrodites with insect infatuations, it's not really applicable.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm partial to flowers with daddy issues.
Nice work.
Okay, I mean, I hate to be a stickler, but this metaphor makes little sense. Flowers are simultaneously male and female; they have both organs. So, unless this advice is aimed at hermaphrodites with insect infatuations, it's not really applicable.
I am flabbergasted that a bee/flower sex metaphor was not completely apt.That sounds like I'm making fun of you. I'm not. Partly because I know I'd get my e-ass e-handed to me, but mostly because you're definitely a top-3 poster on this site in terms of quality, and I love you in every way. Kind of like...a bee and a flower?
Link to post
Share on other sites
Ng-hey! I mean, I hate to be a stickler, but oh good glayven, this metaphor makes little sense. Flowers are simultaneously male and female; they have both organs for the courting and the sexing and the flaaaaayven! So, unless this advice is aimed at hermaphrodites with insect infatuations, it's not really applicable. Mm-hai bw-ha whoa-hoa!
Frink'd Your Post
Link to post
Share on other sites
I've got him more in the 11-15 range.
Yeah, but remember that one time that I said that really funny thing? You know, that thing? It made Ron Mexico laugh, I think.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was doing a crossword the other day and to my delight the answer was ... SQUELCH!!!So nobody would name a punk band "mouthful of vulva"?In answer to NikkiN, "how did this get published?" is exactly what I'm wondering. As I've discovered, at least half a dozen people see a book prior to publishing -- the writer, deluded though he/she may be; presumably an editor, and a few different people who are responsible for layout, design, cover, and printing. Now, a porn publisher may be a little more streamlined, but I still have to think at least three or four people saw this, and it blows my mind to think that not one of them said, "No, wait, stop...this isn't porn, it's porn FAIL."

Link to post
Share on other sites
I was doing a crossword the other day and to my delight the answer was ... SQUELCH!!!So nobody would name a punk band "mouthful of vulva"?In answer to NikkiN, "how did this get published?" is exactly what I'm wondering. As I've discovered, at least half a dozen people see a book prior to publishing -- the writer, deluded though he/she may be; presumably an editor, and a few different people who are responsible for layout, design, cover, and printing. Now, a porn publisher may be a little more streamlined, but I still have to think at least three or four people saw this, and it blows my mind to think that not one of them said, "No, wait, stop...this isn't porn, it's porn FAIL."
The author shouldn't be paid for this work. He/she should be fined.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I was doing a crossword the other day and to my delight the answer was ... SQUELCH!!!So nobody would name a punk band "mouthful of vulva"?In answer to NikkiN, "how did this get published?" is exactly what I'm wondering. As I've discovered, at least half a dozen people see a book prior to publishing -- the writer, deluded though he/she may be; presumably an editor, and a few different people who are responsible for layout, design, cover, and printing. Now, a porn publisher may be a little more streamlined, but I still have to think at least three or four people saw this, and it blows my mind to think that not one of them said, "No, wait, stop...this isn't porn, it's porn FAIL."
because the smut industry has such exacting standards.
Link to post
Share on other sites
As consumers of smut, we should demand a higher quality of filth.
True dat.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...