serge 904 Posted April 21, 2009 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 They might win to avoid the sweep, but I wouldn't put dime one on it.I agree..I like to play trends, and not try and predict when a 8 game losing streak will end.Montreal is outclassed here by a large margin.The other series are different. St Louis could take a game from Vancouver..I really like Columbus at home, especially to keep it low scoring..I can see a 2-1 Columbus win.Philly vs Pittsburgh I believe has been the closest fought series yet and has the potential to go very long.Carolina vs Jersey as well. Link to post Share on other sites
strategy 4 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 The other series are different. St Louis could take a game from Vancouver..I'm hearing kariya might play? it really depends on the line. if it's even money, I don't think it's worth a bet. Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I'm hearing kariya might play? it really depends on the line. if it's even money, I don't think it's worth a bet.Hockeycentral program here in TO says Kariya is not playing, as per Davidson. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I wouldn't take Pit/Phi under. Although both goalies have the ability to shut it down, both teams just have too much firepower. Biron is inconsistent at best, and with Fleury, I don't think he's ever going to be one of those 2.00 GAA type goalies, he always just makes the saves when they matter. He's a good 5-3 type goalie, if you know what I mean. Link to post Share on other sites
rinswun 6 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Det/Clb is actually U5.0 (+115)i still like this even at 5,.as serge said columbus always keeps it tight at home and osgood has been in pretty good form from what i have read so it looks a decent shout to be a low scoring game. Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 i still like this even at 5,.as serge said columbus always keeps it tight at home and osgood has been in pretty good form from what i have read so it looks a decent shout to be a low scoring game.I like it as well. I was also considering the unders on Van-Stl (5.0 -125) and SJ-Ana(5.0 -110).I also couldnt help noticing SJ is +220 to win the series now. I dont like series bets, but that did intrigue me.For now, I'd back the CBJ-DET under. Curious why the line pays so well at +110. Link to post Share on other sites
WestcoastCanuck 0 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I like:Det - CBJ underVan - Stl underBos over Mtl tomorrowSj over Ana at the right price. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 21, 2009 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 I like it as well. I was also considering the unders on Van-Stl (5.0 -125) and SJ-Ana(5.0 -110).I also couldnt help noticing SJ is +220 to win the series now. I dont like series bets, but that did intrigue me.For now, I'd back the CBJ-DET under. Curious why the line pays so well at +110.The statistics are very heavily against teams down 2-0....only 13% of teams down 2-0 win...I would think even less when they have to do it on the road.. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Clb-Det under is the only play I'd make.I don't like the SJ bet. Link to post Share on other sites
coesillian 0 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I'm also a fan of the CBJ-DET under.how many dinero?is 200$ the standard bet unless we really like a spot? Link to post Share on other sites
strategy 4 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Clb-Det under is the only play I'd make.I don't like the SJ bet.I agree with this post. Anh isn't losing this series 1 in 3.2, if I'm deciphering the line correctly. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 21, 2009 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 I'm also a fan of the CBJ-DET under.how many dinero?is 200$ the standard bet unless we really like a spot?Well until we went berzerko tilt, the standard bet was $50...Now we have really upped the stakes.... Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 The statistics are very heavily against teams down 2-0....only 13% of teams down 2-0 win...I would think even less when they have to do it on the road..your right, not a bet I love, but I have to say, the +220 intrigued me. Just not worth it though. Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 We seem to have a few positives for the CBJ-DET game to go under 5.0.Anyone against it? I say we put down $200.I'm comfortable with that number, cause I'd rate this as a 8/10 bet for me, I like it, but dont love it. If I liked it more, Id be around $300/$400, cause with our roll around $1k now, we can use a couple of big bets to get us back to even. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 21, 2009 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 I think there is a consensus..i will make the bet$200 it is... Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 21, 2009 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 Det/Columbus1 Under 5.0 @ +110 Risk: 200.00 Straight Potential Winnings: 220.00AFTER this bet we have $742.98 Link to post Share on other sites
strategy 4 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Det/Columbus1 Under 5.0 @ +110 Risk: 200.00 Straight Potential Winnings: 220.00AFTER this bet we have $742.98hopefully we won't be seeing much of the cannon! Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 21, 2009 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 hopefully we won't be seeing much of the cannon!I predict tonight is the night of the MASON..Both Mason's come up big. Link to post Share on other sites
gruven 530 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 One thing about this CLB bet..... and for the record, I think it's a decent bet and I would back the under too... But... I haven't had a chance to read the quotes coming out of CLB.... the jackets problem is that they haven't been able to score. If they talk at all about opening up, I think this game goes over. Detroit is a masterful counterattack team, and while the jackets could score, it means detroit might as well. That could point to an over. But you would have to find some evidence that hitch plans on opening it up...... Link to post Share on other sites
rinswun 6 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 One thing about this CLB bet..... and for the record, I think it's a decent bet and I would back the under too... But... I haven't had a chance to read the quotes coming out of CLB.... the jackets problem is that they haven't been able to score. If they talk at all about opening up, I think this game goes over. Detroit is a masterful counterattack team, and while the jackets could score, it means detroit might as well. That could point to an over. But you would have to find some evidence that hitch plans on opening it up......he was asked if he would consider bringing filatov in to try and kick start the offense and he gave a flat no. didnt seem like he wanted to open things up too much and opening it up isnt really hitch's style either Link to post Share on other sites
WestcoastCanuck 0 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 No Canucks - Blues love? Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 No Canucks - Blues love?I really havent watched as much of this series as I would like, and game 4's are tricky. I'm ok with it, if you got others voting yes. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 21, 2009 Author Share Posted April 21, 2009 No Canucks - Blues love?I want the Canucks to win..but I can also see the Blues winning..I am not sold either way... Link to post Share on other sites
WestcoastCanuck 0 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I meant for the under. Link to post Share on other sites
ajs510 122 Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I meant for the under.Blues and the under FTW. 2-0 final. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now