Zach6668 513 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 biatch, can you get on msn? Link to post Share on other sites
Ottawa_Biatch 288 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 P.S. Zach, my buddy David (my friend you met from Best Buy) and I will be in the market at the Dubliner drinking a few beers and eating some nachos, wings, chicken fingers, etc. (we're gettin that platter with everything on it), and watching the MTL/BOS game. If you're bored, you're welcome to come. We'll be there for 7:30pm, text me if interested. Link to post Share on other sites
Ottawa_Biatch 288 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 6 way man date tonight.Biatch + Biatchs friend + Zach + NHL Playoffs + Beer/Food + [insert your name here]The insert name here, means all FCP'ers come to the Aulde Dubliner in Ottawa. We will have a group imaginary hug, it will be wonderful. Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 6 way man date tonight.Biatch + Biatchs friend + Zach + NHL Playoffs + Beer/Food + [insert your name here]The insert name here, means all FCP'ers come to the Aulde Dubliner in Ottawa. We will have a group imaginary hug, it will be wonderful.Sounds good. No hockey tonight, I'm seeing Lisa Lampanelli.Go Flames! Link to post Share on other sites
pezeveng 207 Posted April 18, 2009 Share Posted April 18, 2009 Sev, bet the in-play under, if it's the same/good odds.Its 4.5 now at the end of the first. My busy season is here so Iam not that reliable. Personally I bet the first 2 games under but for some reason Iam laying off the Flames game. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 18, 2009 Author Share Posted April 18, 2009 Sounds good. No hockey tonight, I'm seeing Lisa Lampanelli.Go Flames!awesome..Where are u seeing her??I love her from her appearances on Howard Stern. Link to post Share on other sites
pezeveng 207 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 the 2 west games look like good unders again. St louis vs Van 5 under -120. and SJ vs Ana 5 under -115. No west game has gone over yet as both went under again yesterday, I will be around today till 5 pm so I'll wait for a consensus. The Flyers are only -125 at home that smells like trout right there not sure if I can pull the trigger either way on that one. Link to post Share on other sites
rinswun 6 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 i like both the unders bets, but the nucks/blues one in particular - ride luongo all the way during this steak of his. i would definitely be on board for both those bets.phi/pitts - i think the pens are gonna win. no analyse or anything, just a feeling lol Link to post Share on other sites
pezeveng 207 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I feel Philly may be the suckers bet of the day. Link to post Share on other sites
copernicus 0 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 The "lock of the day" is NJ/Car under if its at the usual 5/5.5. I cant see that being worse than a 3-2 game.I also like the Van/Stl under. SJ/Anaheim I dont like as much. I don't have a lot of confidence in Hiller yet and think that one could go over fairly easily. I need to find the line on that game because I think SJ bounces back, but it depends on the price. And the price is......awful. -250. skip it. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 Langenbrunner is out for the Devs, if that affects anything. Certainly helps point towards the under, anyways. Link to post Share on other sites
pezeveng 207 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 coper the juice is way too high on SJ -250. The over under with NJ is 5as well with -105 juice.SJ to come back and win the series is only -130 thats some serious value guys for a number 1 seed. Link to post Share on other sites
copernicus 0 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 coper the juice is way too high on SJ -250. The over under with NJ is 5as well with -105 juice.SJ to come back and win the series is only -130 thats some serious value guys for a number 1 seed.Yeah, I said skip the SJ bet on todays game. I still love the NJ OU. But -130 on SJ to come back is a great price. what is the "3 way bet" showing money lines on both teams and a tie? 0-0 or 1-1 going into OT for NJ/Car is the way this one may go, and if the 3 way bet includes a tie at 300 Link to post Share on other sites
troyomac 0 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I approve any and all bets. Link to post Share on other sites
WestcoastCanuck 0 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 Van under is free money at any odds.I kind of like SJ - Ana under as well, but who knows.I will cast a vote for Car - NJ under if we need it. Link to post Share on other sites
gruven 530 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I think the only real smart play today is the Vancouver under. Good value at -120, and remember the Stars/Nucks series where Luongo and Turco were both out of their minds? this series looks the same. I would back $350 on the Van Under Link to post Share on other sites
rinswun 6 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I would back $350 on the Van Under Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I would back $350 on the Van UnderAgree.=============I know some of you guys are at work and shit, with no access, but for the people asking for what the lines are, you don't need to log in to Bowman's to see them. You can look up the lines yourself. Just an FYI. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 Pittsburgh is +115 today, if anyone likes that. Link to post Share on other sites
pezeveng 207 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 the under is inVan-Blues Under 5.0 @ -120 Risk: 242.98 Straight Potential Winnings: 202.48 Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 $242.98 isn't $350, LOL. Link to post Share on other sites
WestcoastCanuck 0 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I think we should stick to the no more than a third of our bankroll rule, per bet. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 19, 2009 Author Share Posted April 19, 2009 i have a bad feeling about a game that is -120 for a o/u of 5....To be profitable in this sort of bets, you need to win a lot more than you lose...But I will support our decision.In future I dont like laying that much juice.GO RTE Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 Don't don't need to win "a lot" more. You only need to win 6/11 games to breakeven. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted April 19, 2009 Author Share Posted April 19, 2009 Don't don't need to win "a lot" more. You only need to win 6/11 games to breakeven.i know what you mean, but a lot of sports bettors will tell you , its almost impossible to make money laying that much juice.I dont want to go against the group, just wanted to make my point. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now