grocery_mony 8 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 Legends of poker chip counts1Joe Sebok98,000 $53,000 2Alfred Megrabyan86,000 $-3,500 3Robert Cheung69,000 $0 4Tom Schneider67,000 $15,300 5Men Nguyen62,300 $27,400 6Michael Jack Wattell61,500 $41,200 7Brandi Hawbaker60,900 $15,400 8Danny Wong60,000 $38,600 9Ari Engel59,700 $21,700 10John Esposito Jr.54,500 $30,100 11Barry Greenstein Link to post Share on other sites
GWCGWC 83 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 show your tits drop drama bombs all over the interweb = haveing your chip count updated It was a well crafted plan. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted August 27, 2007 Author Share Posted August 27, 2007 I wonder who the lucky guy who staked her is? Link to post Share on other sites
sisass 0 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 sebok always gets a ton of chips early. thoughts on his game? Link to post Share on other sites
yeffy 0 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 Legends of poker chip counts1Joe Sebok98,000 $53,000 2Alfred Megrabyan86,000 $-3,500 3Robert Cheung69,000 $0 4Tom Schneider67,000 $15,300 5Men Nguyen62,300 $27,400 6Michael Jack Wattell61,500 $41,200 7Brandi Hawbaker60,900 $15,400 8Danny Wong60,000 $38,600 9Ari Engel59,700 $21,700 10John Esposito Jr.54,500 $30,100 11Barry GreensteinMore importantly go BodogAri Brooooooklyn represents. Link to post Share on other sites
barrec 0 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 Legends of poker chip counts1Joe Sebok98,000 $53,000 2Alfred Megrabyan86,000 $-3,500 3Robert Cheung69,000 $0 4Tom Schneider67,000 $15,300 5Men Nguyen62,300 $27,400 6Michael Jack Wattell61,500 $41,200 7Brandi Hawbaker60,900 $15,400 8Danny Wong60,000 $38,600 9Ari Engel59,700 $21,700 10John Esposito Jr.54,500 $30,100 11Barry Greensteinnegative three thousand five hundred? Link to post Share on other sites
yeffy 0 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 negative three thousand five hundred?That's his change from his last chip count. Link to post Share on other sites
Tiltinagain 973 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 I wonder who the lucky guy who staked her had his POB is?FYP Link to post Share on other sites
barrec 0 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 That's his change from his last chip count.ah. ty. Link to post Share on other sites
grocery_mony 8 Posted August 27, 2007 Author Share Posted August 27, 2007 FYPThought that was a given Link to post Share on other sites
Tiltinagain 973 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 Thought that was a given Good point! Link to post Share on other sites
looshle 6 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 i played some 40/80 with her at the commerce. she looks like shes def on something and played horribly. One hand it was 4 way action, she raises out of the BB and everyone calls. Flops TT3 with 2 hearts she bets, gets raised, i fold, button3 bet and she calls. turns a 7, checks around, rivers a 3 she fires and loses to K7hh. She then reloads for 200, loses it and leaves. Link to post Share on other sites
fitzinabox 0 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 so your saying that she isn't using correct david skalansky poker strat?? Back to being a prostitute i guess. Link to post Share on other sites
vbnautilus 48 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 so your saying that she isn't using correct david skalansky poker strat?? Back to being a prostitute i guess.I thought being a stripper was correct sklansky strat for young women. Link to post Share on other sites
AAsnake88 0 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 I thought being under 18 was correct sklansky strat for young women.FYP Link to post Share on other sites
Kestral123 0 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 For the love of god people, please put a better description of the thread in the subject line, if for no other reason than to save poor thread skimmers like me the trouble of having to click into the thread to see what it's about. "Huh?" is utterly useless./rant over/ Link to post Share on other sites
theinvestor 0 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 For the love of god people, please put a better description of the thread in the subject line, if for no other reason than to save poor thread skimmers like me the trouble of having to click into the thread to see what it's about. "Huh?" is utterly useless./rant over/+1 Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted August 27, 2007 Share Posted August 27, 2007 Maybe she can actually play...? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now