GCP 0 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Okay, I get why the Department of Justice are working to cut off the deposits going into poker sites, but why are they cutting off the means to withdraw money as well? If I take money out, I won't be able to gamble with it anymore and better me having it than them, right? What's the reasoning here? Link to post Share on other sites
doox 15 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 But they know that there's no point in playing for real money if you can't cash it out when you win it. This is to get the people that don't go busto on a regular basis. Link to post Share on other sites
GCP 0 Posted February 1, 2007 Author Share Posted February 1, 2007 Why not let us get our money out but stop the money from going IN? Eventually the games will dry up and no one gets screwed over. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Why not let us get our money out but stop the money from going IN? Eventually the games will dry up and no one gets screwed over.Except me, and the rest of us who play for our primary sources of income. Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Why not let us get our money out but stop the money from going IN? Eventually the games will dry up and no one gets screwed over.Good idea.........or, they could not ban it at all. This way's better because we get to play poker, instead of your way, where we don't get to play poker. Do you see the advantages that my way has? Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Is this the same GCP from SYR? Link to post Share on other sites
UncleCollins 0 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 The reasoning is that people are not going to put money in if they can't take money out. As annoying as it may be, it makes sese. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Good idea.........or, they could not ban it at all. This way's better because we get to play poker, instead of your way, where we don't get to play poker. Do you see the advantages that my way has?You play poker? Link to post Share on other sites
trippkelly 0 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Good idea.........or, they could not ban it at all. This way's better because we get to play poker, instead of your way, where we don't get to play poker. Do you see the advantages that my way has?Good stuff.... Link to post Share on other sites
finztotheleft 0 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 You understand that you are asking the United States government to use logic, right ? Link to post Share on other sites
umop-apisdn 0 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 It couldn't be that these companies are facing a run on their cash accounts and don't have enough to float the withdrawals... nah - you can trust those off-shore guys... Link to post Share on other sites
Pot Odds RAC 23 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Except me, and the rest of us who play for our primary sources of income....and what about those poor drug dealers put out of business because of enforcement of drug laws? Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 ...and what about those poor drug dealers put out of business because of enforcement of drug laws?I can sympathize. Gotta make a living somehow. Link to post Share on other sites
GCP 0 Posted February 2, 2007 Author Share Posted February 2, 2007 LongLiveYorke, yeah we get screwed over that way, but at least we get OUR money back. I could live with that.Zach, yes.Umop, lol, good call. That's certainly a possibility as well. Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisRichey 1 Posted February 2, 2007 Share Posted February 2, 2007 ...and what about those poor drug dealers put out of business because of enforcement of drug laws?Technically, the archaic drug laws are what provides them with income. If they were legal, they'd quickly be out of business. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now