Jump to content

Recommended Posts

announcers and please quote to me the last time Chad mis-read a hand.?
final table 04. krux all in with A9 and ramer raymer has AQboard AK53chad "krux needs a nine or if a 5 comes we'd have a split pot"chad missed the fact that if a 3 came there'd also be a split pot. not the worst misread but definately the most recent
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I like the setup of the WPT better with 6 people at the 2 final table, but Norman Chad makes up for it. He is the most entertaining poker host hands down. 8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

something that I thought that was cool was I remember Daniel N. say after Jean Robert knocked him out of the WPT at the Mirage I believe that Jean robert REALLY overvalues his draws and wow did it come out. Espically in the hands that he doubled up Jen Harmon and went out on with a pair of 4's and a gutshot straight.Overall, I liked it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
announcers and please quote to me the last time Chad mis-read a hand.?
final table 04. krux all in with A9 and ramer raymer has AQboard AK53chad "krux needs a nine or if a 5 comes we'd have a split pot"chad missed the fact that if a 3 came there'd also be a split pot. not the worst misread but definately the most recent
How is that a mis-read??? Nothin he said was false or not true. He failed to mention a 3, thats not a mis-read, he just forgot to mention a 3 would split. Sexton and VVP are just censored boring. They have no entertainment value.
Link to post
Share on other sites
announcers and please quote to me the last time Chad mis-read a hand.?
final table 04. krux all in with A9 and ramer raymer has AQboard AK53chad "krux needs a nine or if a 5 comes we'd have a split pot"chad missed the fact that if a 3 came there'd also be a split pot. not the worst misread but definately the most recent
How is that a mis-read??? Nothin he said was false or not true. He failed to mention a 3, thats not a mis-read, he just forgot to mention a 3 would split. Sexton and VVP are just censored boring. They have no entertainment value.
$800,000 omission
Link to post
Share on other sites
I would take VVP/Sexton over Chad/McEachern anyday of the week. I would rather have Lederer/Hellmuth for a mix of comedy relief and analysis however :club:
VVP/Sexton are to poker what Bellande was to the final table last night, annoying and obnoixus. I think Mceachern and Chad are great announcers and please quote to me the last time Chad mis-read a hand. He doesnt do the commentary live, so I know for a fact he doesnt mis-read a hand cause it would be corrected in editing. Anymore stupid complaints?
No complaints! You have just proven my point! He doesn't even do it live, and still censoreds up the scenarios. Conclusion, even editing can't help them :DThe only specific example I have is what Ian posted, however, I know that there are most definately more recent, and with the WSOP 2005 events debuting, I can't wait to post them.Also, how is Mike Sexton obnoxious?! I never heard him say anything that would result in "obnoxious" being the correctly used adjective. VVP says "Wired Pair", get over it. Norman Chad has his hilarious "Ex wives" jokes (sw)
Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought it was excellent coverage by ESPN. Good final table over all. Unfortunately for Jennifer her QQ got smoked by 9-10 os. Oh well thats poker.
Good coverage, yes, but that Live Full Tilt spoiled me. I think it helps to see every hand, and espn might want to consider devoting enough time for the big events for live final tables, or at least unedited. Or at the very least only edit the down time in between hands so that we just see the "action." But it is nice to see the hands that get layed down, and the poker being played...not just the gambling.just my $.02
problem w/ that is that the ME final table was what, like 14 hours. It'd be really hard to show that much straight live coverage. I mean, only us poker junkies would watch that whole thing. It'd be really nice if they could just put it on ESPN2 or something. As for norman Chad, what he does that really bothers me is not think about the situation. There was one time where the Iron worker guy was on the short stack and folded AQ after a raise and a reraise. To hear Chad talk about it you'd think he folded the nuts. I'm not saying I would have definitely folded there, but I can't say it was a horrible fold.
Link to post
Share on other sites
announcers and please quote to me the last time Chad mis-read a hand.?
final table 04. krux all in with A9 and ramer raymer has AQboard AK53chad "krux needs a nine or if a 5 comes we'd have a split pot"chad missed the fact that if a 3 came there'd also be a split pot. not the worst misread but definately the most recent
How is that a mis-read??? Nothin he said was false or not true. He failed to mention a 3, thats not a mis-read, he just forgot to mention a 3 would split. Sexton and VVP are just censored boring. They have no entertainment value.
$800,000 omission
$800,000 omission?? How did Norman Chad cost anyone 800K? Did a 3 come?? No......I dont get your comment......
Link to post
Share on other sites
announcers and please quote to me the last time Chad mis-read a hand.?
final table 04. krux all in with A9 and ramer raymer has AQboard AK53chad "krux needs a nine or if a 5 comes we'd have a split pot"chad missed the fact that if a 3 came there'd also be a split pot. not the worst misread but definately the most recent
How is that a mis-read??? Nothin he said was false or not true. He failed to mention a 3, thats not a mis-read, he just forgot to mention a 3 would split. Sexton and VVP are just censored boring. They have no entertainment value.
$800,000 omission
$800,000 omission?? How did Norman Chad cost anyone 800K? Did a 3 come?? No......I dont get your comment......
He means that if the 3 came, it would have saved Krux from going out = $800,000. He obviously doesn't mean that Norman Chad was responsible for the 3 not coming. You asked for an example, and he presented one, that was all. You lose.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that Normad Chad's commentary is very annoying.However, a lot of his commentary is probably scripted. After they finish all the editing, Chad probably sits in a sound stage and does his commentary over the finished product. Notice how he continues to talk during the hand even over the editing process. There is a lot cut out that we don't see like the 5 minute decisions players make that seem to only take a few seconds. Yet Chad seems to keep on talking without a break in the action.Fire the writer and replacing him couldn't hurt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that Normad Chad's commentary is very annoying.However, a lot of his commentary is probably scripted. After they finish all the editing, Chad probably sits in a sound stage and does his commentary over the finished product. Notice how he continues to talk during the hand even over the editing process. There is a lot cut out that we don't see like the 5 minute decisions players make that seem to only take a few seconds. Yet Chad seems to keep on talking without a break in the action.Fire the writer and replacing him couldn't hurt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

coverage/layout looked like last year, not necesessarily a bad thing. Norman Chad is kinda growing on me, I have a feeling he aint goin anywhere, and some of his comments, tho dumb, can be funny....SOME. I was surprised to see Phil push with 9-5off and I thought when Jen picked up QQ she was gonna double up again, and comeback for the win....but poker is always full of surprises....overall, it was fun to watch I think :club:

Link to post
Share on other sites
announcers and please quote to me the last time Chad mis-read a hand.?
final table 04. krux all in with A9 and ramer raymer has AQboard AK53chad "krux needs a nine or if a 5 comes we'd have a split pot"chad missed the fact that if a 3 came there'd also be a split pot. not the worst misread but definately the most recent
How is that a mis-read??? Nothin he said was false or not true. He failed to mention a 3, thats not a mis-read, he just forgot to mention a 3 would split. Sexton and VVP are just censored boring. They have no entertainment value.
$800,000 omission
$800,000 omission?? How did Norman Chad cost anyone 800K? Did a 3 come?? No......I dont get your comment......
He means that if the 3 came, it would have saved Krux from going out = $800,000. He obviously doesn't mean that Norman Chad was responsible for the 3 not coming. You asked for an example, and he presented one, that was all. You lose.
Yeah your right, and if I wouldve gotten my Ace on the river I would of won that 1K pot but I didnt and the 3 didnt come, it wasnt an 800K omission, so the comment was stupid.And please dont make claims that you cant back up. If your going to say he mis-reads hands, please have examples, him not saying a 3 would split a pot isnt a misread, nothin he said was a misread, he said a 9 would win it for Krux and a 5 would split it, both of which were true.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Last night: Harman goes all in with QQ and gets called by 9 10, Chad to crowd: "Jennifer Harman is a 4/1 favorite, but I am sure she wanted Lee to fold"Yes, I am POSITIVE she wanted him to fold there, being a 4/1 favorite to double up and win the tournament.gg.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anyone else watch his post tourney interview with Chad?? "Sometimes I just have these feelings, and most of the time, when I listen to those feelings, it works"If I had a nickel for everytime a donkey said, "I just had a feeling" I wouldnt be playin 1/2.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Last night: Harman goes all in with QQ and gets called by 9 10, Chad to crowd: "Jennifer Harman is a 4/1 favorite, but I am sure she wanted Lee to fold"Yes, I am POSITIVE she wanted him to fold there, being a 4/1 favorite to double up and win the tournament.gg.
If he folds, then she takes down the pot right there, there are no more cards, she cant lose the hand. Sure she wants to double up, but if you dont have the nuts, then there are hands that can beat you and with an overcard on the board, why would she want him to call?? O, and she couldnt of won the tournament right there, she would of just doubled and Im not sure she would of even been chip leader at that point, Lee had a monster chip lead. Sorry buddy, you lose again
Link to post
Share on other sites
Doug Lee is a garbage player who would've ended up losing if he didn't river trips on harman. As for Norman Chad, it makes me wanna change the channel every time he speaks. He says the corniest jokes and knows jack about the game. If he says the ex-wife joke one more time ..... I thought the coverage by ESPN was great tho, they did well for the first tournament and I'm excited to watch the other events.
Be sure to let us know when you make a final table so we can watch and critique your play. Oh Yea... It'll never happen. Untill then S T F U
Link to post
Share on other sites
da_suit, you are either a major tool, a complete moron, or norman chad's sonbut my guess is all fucking 3
Tool, wow, like a hammer?? Only censored donkeys call people tools, what the hell is a tool?? Is that just a dumbass slang term?
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Hold'Em or Fold'Em commercials with Chris Ferguson were hilarious. Nice to see a poker player getting an endorsement from something thats not an online poker room.Also, I think the ESPN announcers are fine. I do like them better than Vince and Mike, but they're ok too.I didn't think Lee played terribly. Obviously, the KK hand was terrible but the final hand didn't he have top pair? He's taking another shot to win and he still would have had the chip lead. Very few people are mentioning how lucky Jen was to stay alive with q7 vs q9.I know if I'm playing Jen Harmon head up I'm going to try and win big pots to beat her because I'm certainly not going to outplay her over a bunch of smaller pots.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tool, wow, like a hammer?? Only censored donkeys call people tools, what the hell is a tool?? Is that just a dumbass slang term?
Would you like to be a phillips-head screwdriver?Howard Ledererererererererererererererer easily does the best job announcing when he gets a chance. VVP and Sexton are bad. Norman Chad is bad. Bob Costas would be a good poker announcer, don't you think? What about Vin Scully?Ice
Link to post
Share on other sites
Last night: Harman goes all in with QQ and gets called by 9 10, Chad to crowd: "Jennifer Harman is a 4/1 favorite, but I am sure she wanted Lee to fold"Yes, I am POSITIVE she wanted him to fold there, being a 4/1 favorite to double up and win the tournament.gg.
If he folds, then she takes down the pot right there, there are no more cards, she cant lose the hand. Sure she wants to double up, but if you dont have the nuts, then there are hands that can beat you and with an overcard on the board, why would she want him to call?? O, and she couldnt of won the tournament right there, she would of just doubled and Im not sure she would of even been chip leader at that point, Lee had a monster chip lead. Sorry buddy, you lose again
The only point you have is that I meant to say "Possibly win the tournament"Second, if she has AK, and he pushes with 10 10, would she call before the flop? Third, give me a ****ing break, being a 4/1 favorite, I am sure her first thoughts were not "Shit! I wish he folded, I am a HUGE favorite!'This is turning into a flame fest, as result of Norman Chad's stupid face.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Tool, wow, like a hammer?? Only censored donkeys call people tools, what the hell is a tool?? Is that just a dumbass slang term?
Would you like to be a phillips-head screwdriver?Howard Ledererererererererererererererer easily does the best job announcing when he gets a chance. VVP and Sexton are bad. Norman Chad is bad. Bob Costas would be a good poker announcer, don't you think? What about Vin Scully?Ice
I nominate John Madden and Pat Summerall to announce the Main Event next year.
Link to post
Share on other sites
The Hold'Em or Fold'Em commercials with Chris Ferguson were hilarious. Nice to see a poker player getting an endorsement from something thats not an online poker room.Also, I think the ESPN announcers are fine. I do like them better than Vince and Mike, but they're ok too.I didn't think Lee played terribly. Obviously, the KK hand was terrible but the final hand didn't he have top pair? He's taking another shot to win and he still would have had the chip lead. Very few people are mentioning how lucky Jen was to stay alive with q7 vs q9.I know if I'm playing Jen Harmon head up I'm going to try and win big pots to beat her because I'm certainly not going to outplay her over a bunch of smaller pots.
No he didnt, He raised in the SB with 10-9 off, she re-raised 150K, and he called. FLop comes K-10-3 or something and she went all in and he called.And I agree, I think Lee knew he was going to have to get lucky to beat Jen since she is obviously the better player, so he took his shots and got lucky. But his "I just had a feeling" speech afterwards lost him alot of credibility.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Last night: Harman goes all in with QQ and gets called by 9 10, Chad to crowd: "Jennifer Harman is a 4/1 favorite, but I am sure she wanted Lee to fold"Yes, I am POSITIVE she wanted him to fold there, being a 4/1 favorite to double up and win the tournament.gg.
If he folds, then she takes down the pot right there, there are no more cards, she cant lose the hand. Sure she wants to double up, but if you dont have the nuts, then there are hands that can beat you and with an overcard on the board, why would she want him to call?? O, and she couldnt of won the tournament right there, she would of just doubled and Im not sure she would of even been chip leader at that point, Lee had a monster chip lead. Sorry buddy, you lose again
The only point you have is that I meant to say "Possibly win the tournament"Second, if she has AK, and he pushes with 10 10, would she call before the flop? Third, give me a censored break, being a 4/1 favorite, I am sure her first thoughts were not "censored! I wish he folded, I am a HUGE favorite!'This is turning into a flame fest, as result of Norman Chad's stupid face.
Im sure she wasnt dissappointed with a call, but I Im promise she wanted to take down the pot right there. Everyone in poker always uses the quote "Its better to win a small pot, then lose a big pot" which is what happened right there. The pot was big enough for her to want to take down at that moment. He called and had outs, and he caught one, if he folds she wins the pot and is still alive with more chips.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...