Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think being ok with a school not providing medical treatment to someone with massive blood loss is ridiculous.
How about a hospital not providing education? Don't they care? Think of the children!
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

What's the difference between a particular gene sequence in an abstract sense and a particular gene sequence that exists within a cell? Can you explain the difference in a way that doesn't boil down

This is pretty funny. The problem isn't the itty bitty details. The problem is Romney refuses to say if he's going to play Poker or Go Fish with the cards, and is on record as saying he doesn't know

I see.   I'd rather give the poor tax breaks than give them welfare. As a general rule. Let them keep their money to live on rather than take their money and then provide for them.

"There was no significant change over time in the percentage of males or females who had ever had vaginal intercourse or who had had vaginal intercourse during the year prior to the survey. The percentage of males who reported using condoms every time they engaged in vaginal intercourse during the past year increased significantly, from 37% to 50%, and the percentage of males who reported condom use at recently initiated first vaginal intercourse increased from 65% to 80%. On the other hand, female respondents showed no significant change in their condom use."
Anal skyrocketed.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't want to follow the law because it's a clear violation of my 1st amendment rights. Don't take my word for it, just listen to what the Supreme Court says later this year.It ends when a law doesn't violate the constitution.OK. I have no idea what there is to believe or not believe, but whatever. Please explain how this has anything to do with me being a Christian.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
At the federal level I think there is too much porking and general disincentives to responsible behavior that it is very likely it is a net negative.
fuckin' skanks
Link to post
Share on other sites
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
As long as you don't expect the government to supply them for you....oh wait, you're in Canada, crazy pills are crushed up and put in your water supply.Enjoy that hockey...
Link to post
Share on other sites

And Hillary better get her running shoes back from which ever bimbo Bill is sleeping with.Cause President Obama may not be able to run

PHOENIX — The birth certificate which Barack Obama says proves he is a U.S. citizen is a fraud, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio charged Thursday.The sheriff said a forensic examination of the electronic document posted last year by the White House proves that it was not simply scanned into a file but actually put together in several pieces. And Mike Zullo, head of the sheriff’s Cold Case Posse who headed the investigation, said the inconsistencies in the document cannot be explained away by claims that it was optimized or had been scanned with optical character recognition software.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
That's what happens when your mind is opened. You're welcome.
Link to post
Share on other sites
And Hillary better get her running shoes back from which ever bimbo Bill is sleeping with.Cause President Obama may not be able to run
So, with nearly half the country against the President and billions of dollars at their disposal, the Republican party can only find one sheriff in Arizona who claims to have evidence that it's false. Don't you think that if there were compelling evidence for it being false, they would have more than, "Hey, this guy things it's false!"No, you don't think that? Oh, I guess that's because the shriveled shell of your online persona has become completely destructive to any actual political discussion that could take place here. I think that's why.
Link to post
Share on other sites
So, with nearly half the country against the President and billions of dollars at their disposal, the Republican party can only find one sheriff in Arizona who claims to have evidence that it's false. Don't you think that if there were compelling evidence for it being false, they would have more than, "Hey, this guy things it's false!"No, you don't think that? Oh, I guess that's because the shriveled shell of your online persona has become completely destructive to any actual political discussion that could take place here. I think that's why.
Dude! Lighten Up! What's wrong with you? Did you get another tooth pulled? I had one pulled in January and I was off kilter for over a month.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a stylish number for all you birthers out there. It comes in aggressively-ugly-brown and is also grammatically incorrect. Buy two! Available now on Internet.3680540386_8c233cf96e.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
A bit of pent up frustration at a lot of things, to be honest.
I don't want to add salt to the wound, but having your idol outed for lying about his birthplace can't be good then?But it looks like President Obama has completely sold his soul.After all the lies, all the willingness to sign anything that removes our rights, after allowing Gitmo to remain open...if he is just removed in disgrace, it will make things go away quickly. Kind of like ripping off a bandage.
Link to post
Share on other sites

let's just say that all the insane theories were right and the prez wasnt born in america. you wanna know my response? a big who cares. it's a goddamn stupid rule anyways.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't want to add salt to the wound, but having your idol outed for lying about his birthplace can't be good then?But it looks like President Obama has completely sold his soul.After all the lies, all the willingness to sign anything that removes our rights, after allowing Gitmo to remain open...if he is just removed in disgrace, it will make things go away quickly. Kind of like ripping off a bandage.
But on Monday, the president brought in one of this town’s most prominent lobbyists to run his White House — or at least a nice piece of it.Steve Ricchetti, whose long list of lobbying clients included Fannie Mae, General Motors, the American Hospital Association and Eli Lilly, was tapped to be counselor to Vice President Biden.Sigh.
Link to post
Share on other sites
But on Monday, the president brought in one of this town’s most prominent lobbyists to run his White House — or at least a nice piece of it.Steve Ricchetti, whose long list of lobbying clients included Fannie Mae, General Motors, the American Hospital Association and Eli Lilly, was tapped to be counselor to Vice President Biden.Sigh.
You say tomatoWe all know Biden is really running things at the WH
Link to post
Share on other sites

But the story went past the first paragraph

Ricchetti’s hiring is not a unique event. Obama’s campaign has hired Broderick Johnson, who had been a lobbyist for Microsoft, Comcast and TransCanada, the company seeking to build the Keystone XL pipeline. Earlier, Obama administration officials got around their self-imposed rule (which prevents a lobbyist from serving for two years) by granting waivers to people Obama sought to appoint, such as former Raytheon lobbyist William Lynn, who got a top job at the Pentagon.The leniency shown to Ricchetti and Lynn might not be so awkward if Obama hadn’t enforced his ethics policy more vigorously in other cases. The administration declined to grant a waiver to Tom Malinowski so he could serve as human rights chief at the State Department; he was disqualified because he had lobbied for torture victims as an official with Human Rights Watch.Ricchetti didn’t need a waiver because he hadn’t been a registered lobbyist for two years. But the timing of Ricchetti’s decision to de-register as a lobbyist for his dozen clients was curious: effective in the fourth quarter of 2008. The firm later filed an amended 2008 report in July 2010, de-registering Ricchetti as a lobbyist for the hospital association.In joining the White House, Ricchetti is trading places with one of his fellow executives at Ricchetti Inc., James Heimbach. Another revolving-door specialist, Heimbach was a lobbyist with Ricchetti until 2006, later joined the Obama White House, then returned to lobby at Ricchetti Inc.Obama once disapproved of Ricchetti’s activities. His campaign in 2007 criticized Hillary Clinton for having Ricchetti as one of her top fundraisers. The Obama campaign later criticized Clinton for requesting an earmark sought by a Ricchetti client.
Link to post
Share on other sites
You still haven't explained why you think the law violates the 1st amendment. Is it because it requires someone to do something that is against their religion?
I've already stated multiple times that the government has no business forcing people to do something against their religion, if that part of their religion isn't criminal, or affecting the liberty of someone else.
I said "leave it to the Christian guy to be the selfish one". I don't think that joke requires explanation.
And then I said , it has nothing to do with me being a Christian, and then you said I don't believe you. Thanks for the recap.My position still has nothing to do with my being a Christian. I'm all for birth control.
Willing to bet?
Absolutely. What are the specifics?
Link to post
Share on other sites
And then I said , it has nothing to do with me being a Christian, and then you said I don't believe you. Thanks for the recap.
It was just a joke!
My position still has nothing to do with my being a Christian. I'm all for birth control.
Says the guy with 27 kids.
Link to post
Share on other sites
let's just say that all the insane theories were right and the prez wasnt born in america. you wanna know my response? a big who cares. it's a goddamn stupid rule anyways.
I don't even want to think about what would happen if the birthers ever got the proof they were looking for. total chaos.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I've already stated multiple times, that the government has no business forcing people to do something against their religion, if that part of their religion isn't criminal
Not to be obnoxious, but if something is against the law, isn't it "criminal" by definition. So...
Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to be obnoxious, but if something is against the law, isn't it "criminal" by definition. So...
Of course, and vb has already pointed that out to me several times. From that point there are two options:1). Georgetown must follow the law.2). Georgetown must take the matter to the supreme court and have the unconstitutional law thrown out.#2 is going to happen this year.
Link to post
Share on other sites
It was just a joke!Says the guy with 27 kids.
I think it was a joke, until he said I don't believe you. That's when it changed. I agree that the original statement was a joke, which is why vb went back to what he originally said, because he realized that his line of thinking about my personal beliefs was wrong.Or at least that's my assumption. We'll never know.Also: touche.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't even want to think about what would happen if the birthers ever got the proof they were looking for. total chaos.
It would absolutely be terrible for the country. No doubt.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...