Jump to content

Awesome Post

Spademan

By Spademan,
in General

 Share Followers 0

Recommended Posts

Dirtydutch

Dirtydutch 8

Posted
Posted
What's with M Wallace having a band-aid on the back of his neck? I mean, he's a bad ass. Why would a bad ass wear a band-aid?
It's in solidarity for his imprisoned brother.nelly_2.jpgAs for the case, a theory I once heard was that Wallace was the Devil, and that was his golden violin. It's a somewhat less metaphysical take on the same ol' line of thought.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Max_Powers

Max_Powers 0

Posted
Posted
It's in solidarity for his imprisoned brother.nelly_2.jpgAs for the case, a theory I once heard was that Wallace was the Devil, and that was his golden violin. It's a somewhat less metaphysical take on the same ol' line of thought.
If I was the devil I would use my devilish powers to avoid getting a ss rammed.
Link to post
Share on other sites
NortonFan

NortonFan 0

Posted
Posted
mmmmmmmkay, but wouldn't that make whitish light?Now this is a good answer and a reminder to add this to my netfix queue. What's with M Wallace having a band-aid on the back of his neck? I mean, he's a bad ass. Why would a bad ass wear a band-aid?
Ving Rhames has a big scar on the back of his neck so they used the band-aid to cover it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
hank213

hank213 1,823

Posted
Posted
mmmmmmmkay, but wouldn't that make whitish light?Now this is a good answer and a reminder to add this to my netfix queue. What's with M Wallace having a band-aid on the back of his neck? I mean, he's a bad ass. Why would a bad ass wear a band-aid?
Maybe he cut himself shaving. We all know that bleeds like bitch.
Link to post
Share on other sites
chgocubs99

chgocubs99 0

Posted
Posted
It's possible that he's talking about 'race in general'. If so, then the answer is no; it will never, ever be new material time. As long as the public has been trained like whipped mules to remain comedically hypersensitive about race, then I'll have material to work with, and indeed, a little bit of purpose in my own life.
Yes I am, and I'm not sensitive about it at all. You're just making my ears hurt and beating a dead horse, over, and over, and over again. It didn't help that your post wasn't funny either...yea yea, I get it, it isn't supposed to be funny, or if you prefer, it's funny because its true. I missed the wittiness of it (and most of your other comments about). My loss I guess. I guess I'm too sensitive?Oh yea, it also doesn't help that you go WAY the hell out of your way to make comments at times that have no place whatsoever in the discussion simply to make your "point". That's what really makes my ears hurt.
Link to post
Share on other sites
GWCGWC

GWCGWC 83

Posted
Posted
Yes I am, and I'm not sensitive about it at all. You're just making my ears hurt and beating a dead horse, over, and over, and over again. It didn't help that your post wasn't funny either...yea yea, I get it, it isn't supposed to be funny, or if you prefer, it's funny because its true. I missed the wittiness of it (and most of your other comments about). My loss I guess. I guess I'm too sensitive?Oh yea, it also doesn't help that you go WAY the hell out of your way to make comments at times that have no place whatsoever in the discussion simply to make your "point". That's what really makes my ears hurt.
I'm kind of curious as to what kind of voice and accent you've assigned to Smarc.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Spademan

Spademan 94

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The day I'm out of the military and no longer forced to read v/r at the end of every e-mail will be awesome.
I knew someone would catch that.I am in total agreement.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Sal Paradise

Sal Paradise 57

Posted
Posted
Yes I am, and I'm not sensitive about it at all. You're just making my ears hurt and beating a dead horse, over, and over, and over again. It didn't help that your post wasn't funny either...yea yea, I get it, it isn't supposed to be funny, or if you prefer, it's funny because its true. I missed the wittiness of it (and most of your other comments about). My loss I guess. I guess I'm too sensitive?Oh yea, it also doesn't help that you go WAY the hell out of your way to make comments at times that have no place whatsoever in the discussion simply to make your "point". That's what really makes my ears hurt.
man, where is wang with the 'humorless faggot' drawing when you need him?
Link to post
Share on other sites
AmScray

AmScray 355

Posted
Posted
I'm not sensitive about it at all.
false
It didn't help that your post wasn't funny either
False
I missed the wittiness of it
True
My loss I guess. I guess I'm too sensitive?
TrueAnd the answer to the briefcase question is: It was a gimmick. It wasn't meant to represent anything finite, but rather was simply an annoying plot line component used by Tarintino put there from the beginning with full foreknowledge that it would culminate in you, the audience, not being told what it was even though you'd really, really like to know. "Let's make this one thing central to the plot of the entire film, then leave everyone hanging... " The Sopranos took a cue from this. It's been done in literature more than a few times. In short: It wasn't anything other than the director LOL'ing at the discussions and speculation he knew would ensue about "what it was".Either that, or it was indeed just a philosophical device which was intended to represent that which people want most, whatever it may be.
Link to post
Share on other sites
speedz99

speedz99 145

Posted
Posted
In short: It wasn't anything other than the director LOL'ing at the discussions and speculation he knew would ensue about "what it was".
Since most of your "racist" stuff gets ignored these days you must spend a lot of time being sad that you have nothing to LOL at.
Link to post
Share on other sites
AmScray

AmScray 355

Posted
Posted
Since most of your "racist" stuff gets ignored these days you must spend a lot of time being sad that you have nothing to LOL at.
That's a helluva theory. Ever consider trying to get it published in some Journal?
Link to post
Share on other sites
vbnautilus

vbnautilus 48

Posted
Posted
Either that, or it was indeed just a philosophical device which was intended to represent that which people want most, whatever it may be.
More precisely, it was what Hitchcock called a MacGuffin:A MacGuffin (sometimes McGuffin) is a plot device that motivates the characters or advances the story, but the details of which are of little or no importance otherwise.The element that distinguishes a MacGuffin from other types of plot devices is that it is not important what the object specifically is. Anything that serves as a motivation will do. The MacGuffin might even be ambiguous. Its importance is accepted by the story's characters, but it does not actually have any effect on the story. It can be generic or left open to interpretation.
Link to post
Share on other sites
speedz99

speedz99 145

Posted
Posted
Darn. I guess I failed there at that obvious attempt to elicit an LOL.
It's ok, we all fail sometimes.
and speedz...I WAS RIGHT. IT NEVER CAUGHT ON. IN YOUR FACE. feel the shame.
Oh it caught on. In fact, it was used in this very thread.
Link to post
Share on other sites
speedz99

speedz99 145

Posted
Posted
I'm not C'inIt's just been rainingon my face
These aren't tears of sadness because you're leaving me.I've just been cutting onions. I'm making a lasagna...For one.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Followers 0
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...