Jdr999
Members-
Content Count
2,147 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Jdr999
-
Great picks so far!
-
Sorry in advance if any of these have been done before:Penis RiderSchool of PenisThe Pink PenisThe World's Fastest PenisBarbie in the 12 Dancing PenisesCurious Penis
-
Because after Party Poker was shut down to US players, I spent my Party Points on their coffee cup. It sucks. Easily spills, have to hand wash, and it's a Party Poker cup. Enough said.
-
Carlton From Fresh Prince 3rd In Chips
Jdr999 replied to Seattleallstar's topic in General Poker Forum
Again I am reminded my the replies why I have the OP on my ignore list. -
These hands are just coolers. Only thing I didn't like was turn check in 2nd hand. Bet turn.
-
Don't pay, but I would go see a doctor. Very likely you have an STD. GL.
-
ty for posting this.
-
Yes, you are correct, but as I said before, it is very hard to lose 5 straight HU SNG's compared to 5 straight 9-man SNG's. While you can triple you buy-in in a 9-man SNG, you have to do this often to make a good profit. For example, if you cash 50% of the time in 9-man SNG and only cash in 3rd place, you are losing $ (I know, unlikely example). How much ROI you make in 9-man SNG's depends on not how much you cash, but how much you cash for. As for the bubble comment, this is speaking to 9-man SNG's more than HU SNG's. If the stacks in 9-man SNG's 4-handed are:You: $3,0002nd player: $5,0003rd
-
No. I will agree that HU cash games have much more variance that 9-man SNG, but a HU SNG's have less variance. In HU SNG's there are only two results: you lose or you win. In 9-man SNG's there are 4: (4th-9th place: lose. [For $5+.50- 3rd: $3.5 profit, 2nd: $8 profit, 1st: $17 profit]). You also have to deal with higher blinds when you get near or close to the $. One bad beat is the difference between losing your buy-in and winning the 9-man SNG. In HU SNG there is no bubble and the blinds stay low for most matches. Easier to get back to even if on a downswing in 9-man SNG's by winning one, mu
-
I would play $5 Heads-Up SnG's. While you have less of a potential ROI compared to 9-player SNG's, the variance I find to be much less. Very easy to not cash in 5 9-player SNG's; extreamly hard to lose 5 HU SnG's in a row. Also, I find my reads are better playing HU than at a full table.
-
Saying you suck would be an understatement. Why raise so much with 15/30 blinds with T-3o? Nice 25X BB raise. Please tell us you meant to raise less.Also, please play me in HU SNG's.
-
In the famous words of Joe Starkey:"The most amazing, sensational, dramatic, heart-rending...exciting, thrilling finish in the history of college football!"
-
If you raise pre-flop, might as well push all-in with the stack sizes and blinds.
-
2007 Schedule Through Wpt Championship
Jdr999 replied to DanielNegreanu's topic in General Poker Forum
If I were you, I would change my flight to San Jose. -
Please read my post above. This is not a good idea, and will fail.
-
Highly unlikely it will become a reality. My reasoning:1. Getting on cable. This will be a huge problem, and will likely only be offered on premium packages. The NFL Network has this problem, and they are a billion $ established sport that has existed for decades2. Content. What are they going to show: Old WSOP, WPT, HSP, PPT, or another televised poker tournments that have aired. If they did this, it would cost $ to re-air them, and if they wanted new programs, they would need committed sponsers (Online Poker Sites, Beer, etc...) for the programs. Also, even if they just aired new programs fr
-
Here it is: http://youtube.com/watch?v=TvCn_KbLpLY
-
*******!
-
Ditto.
-
1876: Hayes loses to Tillman in popular vote (48% to 51%), wins electoral vote by 1. Did not run for second term.1888: Harrison loses to Cleveland by 1% of popular vote, yet wins electorl vote by large margin (233-168). Yet Cleveland beat Harrison in the 1892 Presidential election.Still elected, but never by a plurality of votes cast.
-
Missing someone?