fighter

Why is Daniel Negreanu trying to ruin the experience for everyone, including himself ? Also is the +ev that Daniel Negreanu thinks he gets from having Doug Polk not limp the button worth completely capitulating on his principles?

Do they provide online poker to americans? The DOJ has made it painfully clear that online poker is covered by the UIGEA. Yeah assuming the main premise of my argument is wrong, than I see no problem.

Doesn't sound like he is all that interested in their employment. Saying you will get paid and getting paid are two different things. Considering the state of online poker at the moment I would take the exact same stand that NA's is taking in relation to this 'job offer'. Not like he can take an illegal online employer to court for unpaid wages. I can only assume from the posts that NA has made that there is an even better reasons based on his experience in this industry and the sites current structure to laugh at them and their offers.

Create the graphs for yourself. http://www.evplusplu...ance_simulator/ He is whatever the term for greater than right is.

everyone with money is getting those emails. I think a lot of people who forgot they had money on the site will be looking to punt. I also think a lot of regs will be looking to withdraw a large portion of their accounts. Game quality could be anything really.

happy birthday Superjon

I think giving them another card to make an inferior holding is better in this situation since we practically have this hand locked down. Really as long as we never fold and all the money is in the middle, I doubt either line is that much different in EV

We print money because they always fold flop. We flopped the world this hand. I don't see the issue with letting the guy think we are slightly weaker than we are by checking. If he is calling flop with 99-QQ, he is calling turn with 99-QQ. It also gives him some rope to try and push us off our hand.

I actually disagree. I like not betting the flop. We have all the aces, there is very little in the way of draws and there is so little behind that just betting half pot twice will get stacks it. Check and give him a chance to catch up.

Seriously though, how much did you lose ?

This thread about otters now hey.

but seriously how much did you lose ?

But how much did you lose ?

But how much did you lose?

Can we all just agree that Stupidhead's name would have been better if he had some numbers in it. Like 5tup1dh3ad.

Hand one. Need to raise flop bigger. As played I would probably fold given your reads.Hand two. Min c/r's on the turn are very rarely bluffs. I would fold. If you do b/f the turn here , then I think there is some merit to checking the turn and bluff catching the river. Hand three. If you don't know how to react to a 4bet here, then don't 3 bet. Against this guy, i have no idea how you think that 3betting AQs is going to be a profitable play. His range is already really strong verse your hand before you even put out the call.

A high board, depending on how aggressive btn is and how liberal of a hand ranking sheet the BB is using, I would sometimes call twice, sometimes only call once.On Q high, if it isn't rainbow non connected then I like leading since it removes us placing the fish in the same spot as before with us c/r him out of the hand. While it will leave us open to exploitation when we check, the bb should be calling often enough that we don't need to worry about btn getting too far out of line trying to exploit us.Honestly I don't like using the term fish ( not that I don't do it all the time). I think tha

I liked the way he played this hand. Keeping the fish in, leading so he doesn't c/r the fish out, folding turn. Very nice hand.

This is not good.You are betting less then half the pot on a board where there are draws EVERYWHERE. By betting this amount you are letting pretty much every hand who got a piece of this board make the perfect play since they are getting great odds.If I was to bet $24 into the pot because it is 2x my Preflop raise, so it is 'considered a big bet', you would rightfully think I am incompetent.Your bet is only 5bb more.Defend your hand, someone is going to come with you on this board.AlsoC. is awful reasoning. If you have the best hand, that is the end of thinking. Who cares if you have limited

limping preflop can be fine, however I don't recommend it for beginners as it puts them in the wrong frame of mind on how to approach the game.1. If you are not comfortable getting all the money in with a set on the flop, I don't think No limit holdem is for you.I'm not trying to be a douche but there is litterally only one hand that beats you. If you are not comfortable placing all your money into the middle with the 2nd nuts when you are only 100bb deep, then you should move down in stakes or try a different poker variant.As it stands flop bet needs to be at least 75c. However I would be mo

It is already a pretty common tattoo.

Same way eating in slavery or starving in freedom does.

Yep, better to live on your knees then die on your feet.

If he can turn up with J3o then I like the play. Without reads (like him playing j3o) I think he would have too many better value hands that he is turning into a bluff for us to call. Nice hand though.