rwood 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 ever since i started playing i have always played cash games and a few tourneys/sng's when i felt like playing for fun. anyways, i was wondering which out of the three have the highest variance i know the most i've ever swung in a cash game is roughly 100 big bets playing limit and rougly 3 buy ins in one session playing NL and PL...anyways just wondering... Link to post Share on other sites
srblan 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 Tourneys. Nuff said. Link to post Share on other sites
FIREonICE 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 ...is a b!itch! Link to post Share on other sites
BNH77 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 its a myth....TP/MM Link to post Share on other sites
Frinkenstein 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 ever since i started playing i have always played cash games and a few tourneys/sng's when i felt like playing for fun. anyways, i was wondering which out of the three have the highest variance i know the most i've ever swung in a cash game is roughly 100 big bets playing limit and rougly 3 buy ins in one session playing NL and PL...anyways just wondering...I think it is generally accepted that Sit N Go's have lower variance than ring games. Certainly I would expect multitable tournaments to have the highest variance. Link to post Share on other sites
Love4hockey 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 In NL I wouldn't judge it on one session. I've gone over 20 tourneys with out a cash. They definately have a higher level of varience. Link to post Share on other sites
FIREonICE 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 variance is the one thing everyone blames their losing streak on. in reality, most players just suck. lol Link to post Share on other sites
ricker 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 variance is the one thing everyone blames their losing streak on. in reality, most players just suck. lolGood Lord, do you ever have anything positive to say or add? Link to post Share on other sites
WonderfulSplash 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 variance is the one thing everyone blames their losing streak on. in reality, most players just suck. lolVariance is responsible for losing streaks even if you suck, just like its responible for winning streaks when you suck.Your sucking at life however, cannot be blamed on variance so GKY. Link to post Share on other sites
Frinkenstein 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 Good Lord, do you ever have anything positive to say or add?His statement may not be positive, but it there is certainly some truth to it.I guess it doesn't attempt to answer OP's questions though. Link to post Share on other sites
FIREonICE 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 yes yes, I suck at life because I post the truth in a poker forum. yes yes, You can sum up someones life by what they post in a online forumyes yes, I suck at life, oh yes yesgood lord, what has this place come to Link to post Share on other sites
Canary3 1 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 sit n go's have the lowest variance.... nl hold em cash games are rigged...... and mtts have the highest variance Link to post Share on other sites
sirch1 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Share Posted April 5, 2006 no such thing as variance, its either you are good or you are bad Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now