pat23 0 Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 lots of experianced players/lots of fish/somewhere in the middle? Link to post Share on other sites
teneight 1 Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 DN and dreamclown play there....def Fishy Link to post Share on other sites
pat23 0 Posted December 28, 2005 Author Share Posted December 28, 2005 wasnt asking about the level of play at the 500-1000 table. Just asking overall or if you want me to be specific at the 1 2 nl and 5 10 limit tables Link to post Share on other sites
Len McRiddle 0 Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Tough to tell, can see any real money tables until you deposit. Link to post Share on other sites
2bthebest 2 Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Its a skin of pokerroom---Here is how bonusw0res.com rates it: Game Quality on the Poker Network The Quality of Game rankings that you see below are based on games that you can expect to find during peak times. The letter grades are based on a bell curve (creating more 'C" grades). If a game is rated as an 'A" it means that particular limit has some of the best games available for that limit (easy to beat, large pots). Conversely, if a limit is rated as an F it means that the games there are usually very poor (very tight, small pots). The 'availability" portion of the chart is the % of time one can expect to find a game at a given limit during peak times. Full Ring Limit Hold'em Limit Grade Availability $.50-$1 B 100% $1-$2 B- 100% $2-$4 C 100% $3-$6 C 100% $5-$10 C 100% $10-$20 C 80% $25-$50 C 45% $50-$100 C+ 10% $100-$200 N/A 0% Short Handed Limit Hold'em Limit Grade Availability $.50-$1 C+ 100% $1-$2 C+ 100% $2-$4 B- 100% $3-$6 C+ 100% $5-$10 C 100% $10-$20 C+ 100% $25-$50 C 10% $50-$100 N/A 0% $100-$200 N/A 10% Please note: Each limit is being compared to other games at that limit around the net. Just because a $20-$40 game gets a B (above average) and a $1-$2 game gets a D (below average) does not mean that the $20-$40 is a better game than the $1-$2. Link to post Share on other sites
TobyOrNotToBe 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 The .50/1 are harder than the $ 2 limit at B&M's here in Fla. Over all Full Tilt is not bad at lower limits but can be easy at higer ones too. Lot's of regulars at limit tables. Link to post Share on other sites
Hold_Em 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 search for kid poker and play him...apparently he is a terrible limit holdem player Link to post Share on other sites
finztotheleft 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Its a skin of pokerroom---Here is how bonusw0res.com rates it: Game Quality on the Poker Network  The Quality of Game rankings that you see below are based on games that you can expect to find during peak times. The letter grades are based on a bell curve (creating more 'C" grades). If a game is rated as an 'A" it means that particular limit has some of the best games available for that limit (easy to beat, large pots). Conversely, if a limit is rated as an F it means that the games there are usually very poor (very tight, small pots). The 'availability" portion of the chart is the % of time one can expect to find a game at a given limit during peak times.  Full Ring Limit Hold'em Limit Grade Availability  $.50-$1 B 100%  $1-$2 B- 100%  $2-$4 C 100%  $3-$6 C 100%  $5-$10 C 100%  $10-$20 C 80%  $25-$50 C 45%  $50-$100 C+ 10%  $100-$200 N/A 0%  Short Handed Limit Hold'em Limit Grade Availability  $.50-$1 C+ 100%  $1-$2 C+ 100%  $2-$4 B- 100%  $3-$6 C+ 100%  $5-$10 C 100%  $10-$20 C+ 100%  $25-$50 C 10%  $50-$100 N/A 0%  $100-$200 N/A 10%   Please note: Each limit is being compared to other games at that limit around the net. Just because a $20-$40 game gets a B (above average) and a $1-$2 game gets a D (below average) does not mean that the $20-$40 is a better game than the $1-$2.Thanks for this breakdown.....I haven't been to bonuswh8res in quite awhile and did not know of this rating system. Thanks ! Link to post Share on other sites
EStormOk 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 I play the lower lever sitngos on party and fcp. I have cashed once out of 8 or 10 sngs on fcp, have won 2 of my last 4 on party (plus a 2nd). It just seems like the play is better on fcp than party. Although the structure and starting amounts are so different it is very hard to compare these with any level of certainty.EStormOk Link to post Share on other sites
charder30 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 about the same as Pokerroom Link to post Share on other sites
jrbrown1548 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Although the structure and starting amounts are so differentWhat are they on FCP? Link to post Share on other sites
SavageHenry 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 8 minutes rounds and 1500 chips. This changed about a month or so ago from untimed 10 hand rounds which i loved. I killed the games with untimed rounds. 8 minutes rounds is too short espexially when people go afk. Now sometimes the blinds are raised before an orbit is done. The result...faster more push happy games...which is bad for the players but good for the rake I still can grind the 10s and 20s and make some spending cash but its more volatile and it harder to play tight when you are not assured 40-50 hands before the push fest. Link to post Share on other sites
Canada 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 wasnt asking about the level of play at the 500-1000 table. Just asking overall or if you want me to be specific at the 1 2 nl and 5 10 limit tables5/10 limit is soft - especially the 5 max tables Link to post Share on other sites
jrbrown1548 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 another thing, are the SnG's 9 or 10 players? Link to post Share on other sites
ajs510 122 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 another thing, are the SnG's 9 or 10 players?10 Players, and they're extremely soft. Link to post Share on other sites
Randy Reed 0 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 The low limit full table ring games like 25/50 and 50/1 are extrememly fishy compared with stars. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now