akishore 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 answer the question.aseem Link to post Share on other sites
custom36 4 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 I'm beat. Link to post Share on other sites
bigkg 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Because I have to take a crap. Link to post Share on other sites
bigkg 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 And I'm beat.Aseem, I would like to hear your deep thinking here to this question. Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Because it is better than Open Farrelling bottom pair? Link to post Share on other sites
akishore 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 why do you fold if you're beat?aseem Link to post Share on other sites
bigkg 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 why do you fold if you're beat?aseemBecause I like money? Link to post Share on other sites
custom36 4 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 why do you fold if you're beat?aseemIt would be -EV to carry on. Link to post Share on other sites
econ_tim 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Here's a different answer.If you are beat, you have maybe 5 outs. Maybe if the pot is big you can call two, but in most cases you aren't getting the odds.If you aren't beat, the raiser could be making a free card play meaning that he probably has a good draw. So you have to dogde the draw outs plus the over outs, and you won't know which cards beat you. If it is on the flop and you have to dodge 15 outs twice (assuming the bettor and raiser have overs plus some weak draw) then you are getting bad full odds. Link to post Share on other sites
vaglvr 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Are we going to find out that 2 +2 really = 5 or something? Link to post Share on other sites
Dirtydutch 8 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Because your “reverse implied odds are 500,000:900”? I mean you win that hand a million times! Link to post Share on other sites
Stylin_Fish 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 See, i use the valuable fold/raise tactic here. It's a really good time to use it. Link to post Share on other sites
akishore 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 if carrying on with bottom pair against a bet and a raise is -EV and it costs you money, why do so many people repeatedly complain that low-limit games aren't beatable because people don't know how to fold and keep calling down with bottom pair against a bet and a raise?aseem Link to post Share on other sites
Dirtydutch 8 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 if carrying on with bottom pair against a bet and a raise is -EV and it costs you money, why do so many people repeatedly complain that low-limit games aren't beatable because people don't know how to fold and keep calling down with bottom pair against a bet and a raise?aseemLIKE I SAID!Because your “reverse implied odds are 500,000:900”? I mean you win that hand a million times! Link to post Share on other sites
bigkg 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 if carrying on with bottom pair against a bet and a raise is -EV and it costs you money, why do so many people repeatedly complain that low-limit games aren't beatable because people don't know how to fold and keep calling down with bottom pair against a bet and a raise?aseemBecause they don't undertstand the concept of EV. Link to post Share on other sites
vaglvr 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 I don't know what you mean, Socrates. Link to post Share on other sites
custom36 4 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 if carrying on with bottom pair against a bet and a raise is -EV and it costs you money, why do so many people repeatedly complain that low-limit games aren't beatable because people don't know how to fold and keep calling down with bottom pair against a bet and a raise?aseemBecause people exaggerate. And people are stoopid. And those people suck at poker. Link to post Share on other sites
Stylin_Fish 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 if carrying on with bottom pair against a bet and a raise is -EV and it costs you money, why do so many people repeatedly complain that low-limit games aren't beatable because people don't know how to fold and keep calling down with bottom pair against a bet and a raise?aseemBecause they don't undertstand the concept of EV.Like Cypher said in The Matrix "ignorance is bliss." Link to post Share on other sites
akishore 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Author Share Posted June 29, 2005 that last question was rhetorical. jayson, sticky this so that people can link it anytime another fish complains that low limits aren't beatable and that you need to play good players to make money.aseem Link to post Share on other sites
vaglvr 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 that last question was rhetorical. jayson, sticky this so that people can link it anytime another fish complains that low limits aren't beatable and that you need to play good players to make money.aseemHave you worked your way to absolute poker? Playing low limits at this place will be a stark reminder to these players. Link to post Share on other sites
custom36 4 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 This was a really bad test. I'm glad you're not a teacher.(sw for the sarcasm-retarded) Link to post Share on other sites
dmoneypoker 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 because it's not PPPPPPPPPPPLUS EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVVVVVVVVVV to continue the hand.... BILL FILLMAFF!!!But the implied tilt odds of sucking out if you hit trips or two pair are immense! Link to post Share on other sites
Hand_Cracker 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 if carrying on with bottom pair against a bet and a raise is -EV and it costs you money, why do so many people repeatedly complain that low-limit games aren't beatable because people don't know how to fold and keep calling down with bottom pair against a bet and a raise?aseemtheir just big whinning babies.but were all guilty of it at some point in time. Link to post Share on other sites
Dirtydutch 8 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 because it's not PPPPPPPPPPPLUS EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVVVVVVVVVV to continue the hand.... BILL FILLMAFF!!!But the implied tilt odds of sucking out if you hit trips or two pair are immense!I have the monopoly on Fillmaff quotes in this thread. Link to post Share on other sites
Smasharoo 0 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 But the implied tilt odds of sucking out if you hit trips or two pair are immense!Never underestimate implied tild odds. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now