gruven 530 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Robert Francis Orr Link to post Share on other sites
gruven 530 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I think in the current NHL, Rob Blake and Ryan Smyth are in that conversation, although none with quite the star status of Yzerman.. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Robert Francis OrrYup, he's probably the only hockey player who I would be excited to meet and I did at a golf course close to Parry Sound a few years ago. He was a total gentleman as our group of about 15 idiots talked to him at the club house. Maybe it's because of the age I am and when I was a very young kid he was the first superstar I idolized.BTW his middle name is Gordon not Francis Link to post Share on other sites
gruven 530 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Yup, he's probably the only hockey player who I would be excited to meet and I did at a golf course close to Parry Sound a few years ago. He was a total gentleman as our group of about 15 idiots talked to him at the club house. Maybe it's because of the age I am and when I was a very young kid he was the first superstar I idolized.BTW his middle name is Gordon not Francis OMG how bad is that...... that's almost as bad as Bush calling Yzerman 'Eye-ZEER-men' Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted May 26, 2010 Author Share Posted May 26, 2010 Do you guys think that money has a lot to do with it?back in the day the players salaries werent in another stratosphere..Its hard to relate to a 20 year old kid making $5 million a year. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Sakic was my first choice when I saw this thread, but Francis deserves to be on here as well. I think it's about impossible to put a currently-playing NHL player on here, although Sakic isn't far removed...which makes it even more impressive that people should consider him. I'd disagree on a personal level about the Borque selection though, since it irks me that people celebrate him leaving the team he was synonomous with to be a mercenary for a Cup. I'd consider him more if he stayed a Bruin.I agree totally! He lost something there in my book. I have more respect for a guy who chooses loyalty over winning. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Do you guys think that money has a lot to do with it?back in the day the players salaries werent in another stratosphere..Its hard to relate to a 20 year old kid making $5 million a year.No I think it has more to do with the increased scrutiny these guys are under and the fact that it's easier to appreciate a player who didn't play for your team once he has retired.I'll add Jean Beliveau to the list. Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted May 26, 2010 Author Share Posted May 26, 2010 I agree totally! He lost something there in my book. I have more respect for a guy who chooses loyalty over winning.This is an interesting concept as it applies to our Maple Leaf hero Mats Sundin...Was he loyal to the franchise when they asked him to be traded for the betterment of the future?He didnt want to leave and basically was forced out... Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I agree totally! He lost something there in my book. I have more respect for a guy who chooses loyalty over winning.agree!I didnt get the big hoopla over him winning a Cup with Colorado. It didnt feel right to me. Link to post Share on other sites
gruven 530 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 This is an interesting concept as it applies to our Maple Leaf hero Mats Sundin...Was he loyal to the franchise when they asked him to be traded for the betterment of the future?He didnt want to leave and basically was forced out...He wasnt forced out. The next season he turned down the leafs to go to the highest bidder. Link to post Share on other sites
ajs510 122 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I agree totally! He lost something there in my book. I have more respect for a guy who chooses loyalty over winning.My personal belief is that a guy who spent almost his entire career being a good company man for a team that wasn't getting it done around him has every right to take his one last shot at glory elsewhere. I cheered my head off for Colorado that year, wanted to see him raise that Cup to the rafters so bad and I wasn't disappointed. Loyalty has to go both ways, and Boston wasn't in a position to reward his loyalty with a good team around him leading to on-ice success. The only thing they could do to reward it was to honor his wishes and trade him to a more competitive team. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 My personal belief is that a guy who spent almost his entire career being a good company man for a team that wasn't getting it done around him has every right to take his one last shot at glory elsewhere. I cheered my head off for Colorado that year, wanted to see him raise that Cup to the rafters so bad and I wasn't disappointed. Loyalty has to go both ways, and Boston wasn't in a position to reward his loyalty with a good team around him leading to on-ice success. The only thing they could do to reward it was to honor his wishes and trade him to a more competitive team.I completely agree that Bourque had every right to move on and try to win. However, that still doesn't take away from what i said. Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafs 142 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 My personal belief is that a guy who spent almost his entire career being a good company man for a team that wasn't getting it done around him has every right to take his one last shot at glory elsewhere. I cheered my head off for Colorado that year, wanted to see him raise that Cup to the rafters so bad and I wasn't disappointed. Loyalty has to go both ways, and Boston wasn't in a position to reward his loyalty with a good team around him leading to on-ice success. The only thing they could do to reward it was to honor his wishes and trade him to a more competitive team.Couldn't have said it better myself. I hardly associate Raymond Bourque with disloyalty. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Tie Domi...is an *******. Link to post Share on other sites
MapleLeafpoker 1,462 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Couldn't have said it better myself. I hardly associate Raymond Bourque with disloyalty.I didnt mean to suggest he did anything wrong to Boston. It was his right.But what I mean is, him winning with Colorado, after a year/two, didnt feel like a huge accomplishment to me.If Chicago signs Sundin this week, and they win the Cup, does it mean anything? Thats the extreme, but thats what it felt like. He went to a prohibitive favourite, played well, deserved a Cup win. But it wasnt the same, or anywhere near it, as lifting the Cup as a Bruin. Link to post Share on other sites
SBriand 4 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I'm a homer so I go with Yzerman, even after the recent events which shows me this city of mine is full of whiny bitches. One of my dad's friends on facebook asked "WHY WOULD HE DO THIS TO US!?!?!" wtf?Anyway, Sakic and Shanny would also be on my list and maybe even lucky Luc. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Oh, I'm down with Robitaille too. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Bobby Clarke ? Link to post Share on other sites
gruven 530 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Bobby Clarke ?Wrong thread. At least wrong adjective.. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Wrong thread. At least wrong adjective..Well I loved him in 72 when he was breaking Russki's ankles. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I thought Shanny was known to perpetrate some stick abuse and is a dick, but I can't be sure...Johnny Bucyk, anyone? Link to post Share on other sites
JoeyJoJo 18 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I thought Shanahan was known to be kind of a dick too.Bourque is the best answer I've heard. I think the fact that everyone was rooting for him to win the Cup even when he had to leave his team for one year to do it is just further proof of how beloved he was.That's my view as a casual fan anyway. Link to post Share on other sites
SBriand 4 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I thought Shanahan was known to be kind of a dick too.Bourque is the best answer I've heard. I think the fact that everyone was rooting for him to win the Cup even when he had to leave his team for one year to do it is just further proof of how beloved he was.That's my view as a casual fan anyway.I don't like your use of the word everyone in that sentence. Link to post Share on other sites
JoeyJoJo 18 Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I don't like your use of the word everyone in that sentence.It wasn't supposed to be literal. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now