Jump to content

Hockey's Most Loved Player


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think in the current NHL, Rob Blake and Ryan Smyth are in that conversation, although none with quite the star status of Yzerman..

Link to post
Share on other sites
Robert Francis Orr
Yup, he's probably the only hockey player who I would be excited to meet and I did at a golf course close to Parry Sound a few years ago. He was a total gentleman as our group of about 15 idiots talked to him at the club house. Maybe it's because of the age I am and when I was a very young kid he was the first superstar I idolized.BTW his middle name is Gordon not Francis
Link to post
Share on other sites
Yup, he's probably the only hockey player who I would be excited to meet and I did at a golf course close to Parry Sound a few years ago. He was a total gentleman as our group of about 15 idiots talked to him at the club house. Maybe it's because of the age I am and when I was a very young kid he was the first superstar I idolized.BTW his middle name is Gordon not Francis
OMG how bad is that...... that's almost as bad as Bush calling Yzerman 'Eye-ZEER-men'
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you guys think that money has a lot to do with it?back in the day the players salaries werent in another stratosphere..Its hard to relate to a 20 year old kid making $5 million a year.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sakic was my first choice when I saw this thread, but Francis deserves to be on here as well. I think it's about impossible to put a currently-playing NHL player on here, although Sakic isn't far removed...which makes it even more impressive that people should consider him. I'd disagree on a personal level about the Borque selection though, since it irks me that people celebrate him leaving the team he was synonomous with to be a mercenary for a Cup. I'd consider him more if he stayed a Bruin.
I agree totally! He lost something there in my book. I have more respect for a guy who chooses loyalty over winning.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you guys think that money has a lot to do with it?back in the day the players salaries werent in another stratosphere..Its hard to relate to a 20 year old kid making $5 million a year.
No I think it has more to do with the increased scrutiny these guys are under and the fact that it's easier to appreciate a player who didn't play for your team once he has retired.I'll add Jean Beliveau to the list.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree totally! He lost something there in my book. I have more respect for a guy who chooses loyalty over winning.
This is an interesting concept as it applies to our Maple Leaf hero Mats Sundin...Was he loyal to the franchise when they asked him to be traded for the betterment of the future?He didnt want to leave and basically was forced out...
Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree totally! He lost something there in my book. I have more respect for a guy who chooses loyalty over winning.
agree!I didnt get the big hoopla over him winning a Cup with Colorado. It didnt feel right to me.
Link to post
Share on other sites
This is an interesting concept as it applies to our Maple Leaf hero Mats Sundin...Was he loyal to the franchise when they asked him to be traded for the betterment of the future?He didnt want to leave and basically was forced out...
He wasnt forced out. The next season he turned down the leafs to go to the highest bidder.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree totally! He lost something there in my book. I have more respect for a guy who chooses loyalty over winning.
My personal belief is that a guy who spent almost his entire career being a good company man for a team that wasn't getting it done around him has every right to take his one last shot at glory elsewhere. I cheered my head off for Colorado that year, wanted to see him raise that Cup to the rafters so bad and I wasn't disappointed. Loyalty has to go both ways, and Boston wasn't in a position to reward his loyalty with a good team around him leading to on-ice success. The only thing they could do to reward it was to honor his wishes and trade him to a more competitive team.
Link to post
Share on other sites
My personal belief is that a guy who spent almost his entire career being a good company man for a team that wasn't getting it done around him has every right to take his one last shot at glory elsewhere. I cheered my head off for Colorado that year, wanted to see him raise that Cup to the rafters so bad and I wasn't disappointed. Loyalty has to go both ways, and Boston wasn't in a position to reward his loyalty with a good team around him leading to on-ice success. The only thing they could do to reward it was to honor his wishes and trade him to a more competitive team.
I completely agree that Bourque had every right to move on and try to win. However, that still doesn't take away from what i said.
Link to post
Share on other sites
My personal belief is that a guy who spent almost his entire career being a good company man for a team that wasn't getting it done around him has every right to take his one last shot at glory elsewhere. I cheered my head off for Colorado that year, wanted to see him raise that Cup to the rafters so bad and I wasn't disappointed. Loyalty has to go both ways, and Boston wasn't in a position to reward his loyalty with a good team around him leading to on-ice success. The only thing they could do to reward it was to honor his wishes and trade him to a more competitive team.
Couldn't have said it better myself. I hardly associate Raymond Bourque with disloyalty.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Couldn't have said it better myself. I hardly associate Raymond Bourque with disloyalty.
I didnt mean to suggest he did anything wrong to Boston. It was his right.But what I mean is, him winning with Colorado, after a year/two, didnt feel like a huge accomplishment to me.If Chicago signs Sundin this week, and they win the Cup, does it mean anything? Thats the extreme, but thats what it felt like. He went to a prohibitive favourite, played well, deserved a Cup win. But it wasnt the same, or anywhere near it, as lifting the Cup as a Bruin.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a homer so I go with Yzerman, even after the recent events which shows me this city of mine is full of whiny bitches. One of my dad's friends on facebook asked "WHY WOULD HE DO THIS TO US!?!?!" wtf?Anyway, Sakic and Shanny would also be on my list and maybe even lucky Luc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Shanahan was known to be kind of a dick too.Bourque is the best answer I've heard. I think the fact that everyone was rooting for him to win the Cup even when he had to leave his team for one year to do it is just further proof of how beloved he was.That's my view as a casual fan anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought Shanahan was known to be kind of a dick too.Bourque is the best answer I've heard. I think the fact that everyone was rooting for him to win the Cup even when he had to leave his team for one year to do it is just further proof of how beloved he was.That's my view as a casual fan anyway.
I don't like your use of the word everyone in that sentence.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...