Jump to content

2009 Wsop Schedule Of Play


Recommended Posts

May 28th: $40,000 No Limit Hold'emMay 29th: $40,000 No Limit Hold'em (Day 2)May 30th: $40,000 No Limit Hold'em (Day 3)May 31st: $40,000 No Limit Hold'em (Final Table)June 1st: 5pm $10,000 7 Card Stud June 2nd: $10,000 7 Card Stud (Day 2)June 3rd: $10,000 7 Card Stud (Final Table)June 4th: 5pm $10,000 Mixed GamesJune 5th: 5pm $2500 Limit Hold'em (6 handed)June 6th: 12pm $5000 No Limit Hold'emJune 7th: 5pm $10,000 Omaha 8June 8th: $10,000 Omaha 8 (Day 2)June 9th: 5pm $3000 HORSEJune 10th: 5pm $10,000 2-7 NL LowballJune 11th: 5pm $2500 Stud 8/Omaha 8June 12th: 12pm $1500 Limit Hold'emJune 13th: 5pm $10,000 NLH Heads UpJune 14th: 12pm $2500 PLO/PLHJune 15th: 5pm $10,000 Limit Hold'emJune 16th: $10,000 Limit Hold'em (Day 2)June 17th: 12pm $5000 Pot Limit OmahaJune 18th: 5pm $10,000 Stud 8June 19th: 12pm $2000 Limit Hold'emJune 20th: 5pm $10,000 Pot Limit OmahaJune 21st: 12pm $5000 No Limit Hold'em ShootoutJune 21st: 5pm $2500 Mixed GamesJune 22nd: DAY OFFJune 23rd: 12pm $10,000 Pot Limit Hold'emJune 23rd: 5pm $2500 Omaha 8June 24: DAY OFFJune 25: DAY OFFJune 26th: $50,000 HORSEJune 27th: $50,000 HORSE (Day 2)June 28th: $3000 Triple Chance No Limit Hold'emJune 28th: $1500 Stud 8June 29th: $2500 2-7 Triple DrawJune 30th: $5000 No Limit Hold'em (6 Max)July 5th: $10,000 No Limit Hold'em (Day 1C)July 8th: $10,000 No Limit Hold'em (Day 2)July 10th: $10,000 No Limit Hold'em (Day 3)July 11th: $10,000 No Limit Hold'em (Day 4)July 12th: $10,000 No Limit Hold'em (Day 5)July 13th: $10,000 No LImit Hold'em (Day 6)July 14th: Play down to 27July 15th: Play down to 9Max number of events played: 27Breakdown by Game:No Limit Hold'em 7Mixed Game Events 6Limit Hold'em 4Omaha 8 or better 22-7 Lowball 2Pot Limit Omaha 2Stud 8 or better 2Pot Limit Hold'em 17 Card Stud 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Last year there many NLHE events at 2000 and under and I had been considering one of them this year. I don't see any this year. Why the drastic change? Are the pros tired of being dominated at the lower buy-in?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow. Last year there many NLHE events at 2000 and under and I had been considering one of them this year. I don't see any this year. Why the drastic change? Are the pros tired of being dominated at the lower buy-in?
Dude, these are the events I'M playing and I don't bother with those small buy in NLH events. Never did, never will...
Link to post
Share on other sites

So the schedule is posted on the WSOP website now?thx Danieledit not on web site yet just checked

Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniel what day is the Ladies event please and ty

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dude, these are the events I'M playing and I don't bother with those small buy in NLH events. Never did, never will...
Oh. I didn't see where you said they were your events, Bro.Guess I should have inferred that from the summary at the bottom of your post.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I see you've mentioned Day 2 and 3s and FTs of some events, but others that would clash with other events start days have not been mentioned. Is this a case of if you're knocked out early in one tournament you will play the ones mentioned, but if you're knocked out of the events where you've listed all possible playing days then you'll rest instead?I'm tired, and think I've worded that horribly, hope you know what I mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites
From His Blog:Tournament Structures: These have not been released or finalized yet, but I want to share my thoughts anyway since this is a topic I'm very passionate about. Here is a simple fact, a fact that should make absolute sense to everyone: the higher the buy in, the more you pay in juice. The higher the buy in, the better the tournament structure should be.This should be a given! So you shouldn't be shocked or surprised to see that the $5000 no limit event has a much better structure than the $1500 event. That's the way it should be across the board. The amount of play in any given tournament should be directly tied to the buy in. So, if you plan on playing the $1500 events, you should expect the structure to have a much faster pace than the $10,000 events.One more thing: Since the smaller events require faster paced structures, when you devise a structure for the event you must cut corners and speed it up in certain spots. It makes a lot more sense to speed up play in the early stages so that when the big money is being played for, it doesn't become a crap shoot. If it's going to be a bit of a crap shoot at any point, then it should be in the early stages. For example, if you had to eliminate the 150-300 level from a $1500 event or the 1500-3000 limit from the event, which will have a more significant impact on the structure? Going from 100-200 to 200-400 is a big jump, but going from 1000-2000 and 2000-4000 at the late stages of an event would make it an absolute crap shoot. If you had to choose, it should seem obvious that omitting levels in the early stages is the best approach.
DanielIn a way I agree with you, yes you should get a better structure in higher buy in events, but the 1500events should not have bad structures either. Your paying in the region of $150 in fees. This is a substantial amount of money, every table is effectively handing over 1 buy in and yet the tourneys get 3k chips, and not all the levels. This is not acceptable in my opinion. What needs to be done is to start out with the 1500events as a base point, implement a good structure for them, and for every other higher buy in event, improve on that. It is the World Series of Poker after all. I've played in $300 tourneys with better structures than the 5k events at the WSOP.For starters, the 1500events should have 4500chips. 1hr clock, and a structure that goes like this:25-5050-10075-150100-200150-300150-300-25200-400-50300-600-75400-800-100500-1000-100600-1200-200800-1600-2001000-2000-3001500-3000-4002000-4000-5003000-6000-5004000-8000-10005000-10000-10006000-12000-20008000-16000-200010000-20000-3000And repeat from here adding zeros.Every other structure can be an improvement on this. The 5k event should be 15kstarting with at least a 75min clock, preferably a 90min clock.RegardsIan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Daniel, how come you're not playing either of the PLO8 events? It's a fun game and I'm sure it has a lot of value to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DanielIn a way I agree with you, yes you should get a better structure in higher buy in events, but the 1500events should not have bad structures either. Your paying in the region of $150 in fees. This is a substantial amount of money, every table is effectively handing over 1 buy in and yet the tourneys get 3k chips, and not all the levels. This is not acceptable in my opinion. What needs to be done is to start out with the 1500events as a base point, implement a good structure for them, and for every other higher buy in event, improve on that. It is the World Series of Poker after all. I've played in $300 tourneys with better structures than the 5k events at the WSOP.For starters, the 1500events should have 4500chips. 1hr clock, and a structure that goes like this:25-5050-10075-150100-200150-300150-300-25200-400-50300-600-75400-800-100500-1000-100600-1200-200800-1600-2001000-2000-3001500-3000-4002000-4000-5003000-6000-5004000-8000-10005000-10000-10006000-12000-20008000-16000-200010000-20000-3000And repeat from here adding zeros.Every other structure can be an improvement on this. The 5k event should be 15kstarting with at least a 75min clock, preferably a 90min clock.RegardsIan
The $1500 structures ARE good. They are very good, but obviously not as good as other big events at the WSOP. The structure you put forth would create events that took far too long to complete. If you used this structure as a base structure for a $1500 event, good luck coming up with a much better structure for the $10,000 buy in events. The WSOP offers close to 60 events. If you make all of the tournaments take five days, then people won't get a chance to play in many of the tournaments they'd like to play in.
Link to post
Share on other sites
The $1500 structures ARE good. They are very good, but obviously not as good as other big events at the WSOP. The structure you put forth would create events that took far too long to complete. If you used this structure as a base structure for a $1500 event, good luck coming up with a much better structure for the $10,000 buy in events. The WSOP offers close to 60 events. If you make all of the tournaments take five days, then people won't get a chance to play in many of the tournaments they'd like to play in.
How big do you expect the 40k to get and how much better of a structure is that going to have? I'm assuming 80k starting stacks and same levels as the main?
Link to post
Share on other sites
How big do you expect the 40k to get and how much better of a structure is that going to have? I'm assuming 80k starting stacks and same levels as the main?
We haven't done the structures yet, but no, I don't think the structure will be as good as the ME, but I'm going to push for it. It's scheduled for four days...
Link to post
Share on other sites
How big do you expect the 40k to get and how much better of a structure is that going to have? I'm assuming 80k starting stacks and same levels as the main?
LOL Looshle! is Mark loving that you used him for your Av? lmao.... that pic rules
We haven't done the structures yet, but no, I don't think the structure will be as good as the ME, but I'm going to push for it. It's scheduled for four days...
ME structure = one of, if not thee, best imo.
Link to post
Share on other sites
We haven't done the structures yet, but no, I don't think the structure will be as good as the ME, but I'm going to push for it. It's scheduled for four days...
I guess the worse structure, the better in my case. Against players of your caliber, my edge would be non existant at 100bb stacks, but slightly +EV in <25bb effective stacks imo.There are a lot of world class NLHE players that butcher short stack play.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...