jeff_536 3 Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 When i was a middle manager at a large media company (cause conglamorate is hard to spell) I took a course on effective discipline and dismissal.It was imperative that any discipline for employees be in writing, explain the bad behaviour and outline the escalating consequences if the behaviour was not rectified. Simply, you couldn't fire an employee, except in unusual circumstances, without telling them beforehand that they might be fired. Link to post Share on other sites
hblask 1 Posted February 20, 2010 Author Share Posted February 20, 2010 We should probably keep hblask from this article; his head might explode.What's weird is, I think Australia is ahead of the US now in the Index of Economic Freedom -- how sad is it that we are behind a country where you not only can't be fired for incompetence, but you have to be KEPT because of it. Link to post Share on other sites
JubilantLankyLad 1,957 Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 When i was a middle manager at a large media company (cause conglamorate is hard to spell) I took a course on effective discipline and dismissal.It was imperative that any discipline for employees be in writing, explain the bad behaviour and outline the escalating consequences if the behaviour was not rectified. Simply, you couldn't fire an employee, except in unusual circumstances, without telling them beforehand that they might be fired.times have changed, old man. thanks to our "liberal" government here in BC, now i can fire someone for any reason i want, including just plain not liking their shoes, and i don't have to give them any warnings or anything. i found that out as a VERY irate, fired member of the downtrodden masses. so i did what any halfway intelligent person would do and became The Man. now i'm the one doing the firing. it's far more satisfying. Link to post Share on other sites
jeff_536 3 Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 times have changed, old man. thanks to our "liberal" government here in BC, now i can fire someone for any reason i want, including just plain not liking their shoes, and i don't have to give them any warnings or anything. i found that out as a VERY irate, fired member of the downtrodden masses. so i did what any halfway intelligent person would do and became The Man. now i'm the one doing the firing. it's far more satisfying.I was also dealing with unionized employees, so there was that extra layer of complication. Link to post Share on other sites
Jeepster80125 0 Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 This almost looks fake. Link to post Share on other sites
Suited_Up 2 Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 What's fake is all the pictures she releases.... Link to post Share on other sites
Jeepster80125 0 Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 cross posted from the religion forum, since no one goes there anyway. Link to post Share on other sites
CaneBrain 95 Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 What's weird is, I think Australia is ahead of the US now in the Index of Economic Freedom -- how sad is it that we are behind a country where you not only can't be fired for incompetence, but you have to be KEPT because of it.No chance those rankings are as bogus as the health care rankings? I call BS. Link to post Share on other sites
hblask 1 Posted February 26, 2010 Author Share Posted February 26, 2010 No chance those rankings are as bogus as the health care rankings? I call BS.You can look up their methodology, if you disagree with any of it, send them suggestions on how to fix it. Link to post Share on other sites
CaneBrain 95 Posted February 27, 2010 Share Posted February 27, 2010 You can look up their methodology, if you disagree with any of it, send them suggestions on how to fix it.I'm just saying it is not like you to just take a set of stats at face value. I feel very economically free. Link to post Share on other sites
Acekob 0 Posted March 9, 2010 Share Posted March 9, 2010 Just... why? Link to post Share on other sites
Jeepster80125 0 Posted March 9, 2010 Share Posted March 9, 2010 Continental CEO will cancel flights before fines[scyukon, this is from ap here]DALLAS – Continental Airlines plans to cancel flights rather than risk stiff fines under new federal rules designed to punish carriers for delaying passengers.CEO Jeff Smisek said Tuesday the result will be that passengers will have more trouble getting to their destinations.A spokesman for the U.S. Transportation Department said airlines can avoid fines by doing a better job of scheduling flights and crews.Under a Transportation Department rule taking effect next month, airlines can be fined up to $27,500 per passenger if planes are delayed three hours and passengers can't get off.Smisek said at an investor conference in New York that long delays are rare, and mostly caused by an outdated air traffic control system that the government has failed to upgrade.Airline industry officials say they should decide whether to wait out delays, even if the delays go past three hours.Smisek said many passengers on delayed flights "really want to go to LA or Mumbai, but the government by God says, 'We're going to fine you $27,500.' Here's what we're going to do: We're going to cancel the flight."Because airlines have cut flights, leaving the remaining ones more crowded, passengers will have fewer chances to rebook on another flight. Passengers, he said, won't get to their destinations "for maybe days."Transportation Department spokesman Bill Mosley said the new rules will help consumers pick airlines that don't have tarmac delays or that routinely cancel their flights."Carriers have it within their power to schedule their flights more realistically, to have spare aircraft and crews available to avoid cancellations" and to rebook passengers when there are cancellations, Mosley said.The new rules grew out of passenger frustration over incidents in which planes were stuck on the tarmac for hours before takeoff. With Congress considering legislation to crack down on delays, the Transportation Department imposed its own 3-hour rule, including fines of up to $27,500 per passenger.That means that for a fully packed medium-sized plane such as a Boeing 737, fines could top $3.5 million per flight, and go much higher on bigger planes used for international flights.At the same investor conference, Continental estimated it will take in $350 million this year from fees on checked bags — a 30 percent jump from the $270 million it raised last year.Continental recently raised its fees to $25 for the first checked bag and $35 for the second, although elite frequent fliers and some other customers don't have to pay.Houston-based Continental, the nation's No. 4 airline, is still thinking about growing by combining with another airline. Continental cut off merger talks with United Airlines a couple years ago, but both are now smaller in comparison to Delta, which acquired Northwest to become the world's largest airline."If we think it's in our best interest to bulk up defensively, we'll do so," Smisek said. Link to post Share on other sites
hblask 1 Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 Continental CEO will cancel flights before fines[scyukon, this is from ap here]DALLAS – Continental Airlines plans to cancel flights rather than risk stiff fines under new federal rules designed to punish carriers for delaying passengers.CEO Jeff Smisek said Tuesday the result will be that passengers will have more trouble getting to their destinations.A spokesman for the U.S. Transportation Department said airlines can avoid fines by doing a better job of scheduling flights and crews.Under a Transportation Department rule taking effect next month, airlines can be fined up to $27,500 per passenger if planes are delayed three hours and passengers can't get off.Smisek said at an investor conference in New York that long delays are rare, and mostly caused by an outdated air traffic control system that the government has failed to upgrade.Airline industry officials say they should decide whether to wait out delays, even if the delays go past three hours.Smisek said many passengers on delayed flights "really want to go to LA or Mumbai, but the government by God says, 'We're going to fine you $27,500.' Here's what we're going to do: We're going to cancel the flight."Because airlines have cut flights, leaving the remaining ones more crowded, passengers will have fewer chances to rebook on another flight. Passengers, he said, won't get to their destinations "for maybe days."Transportation Department spokesman Bill Mosley said the new rules will help consumers pick airlines that don't have tarmac delays or that routinely cancel their flights."Carriers have it within their power to schedule their flights more realistically, to have spare aircraft and crews available to avoid cancellations" and to rebook passengers when there are cancellations, Mosley said.The new rules grew out of passenger frustration over incidents in which planes were stuck on the tarmac for hours before takeoff. With Congress considering legislation to crack down on delays, the Transportation Department imposed its own 3-hour rule, including fines of up to $27,500 per passenger.That means that for a fully packed medium-sized plane such as a Boeing 737, fines could top $3.5 million per flight, and go much higher on bigger planes used for international flights.At the same investor conference, Continental estimated it will take in $350 million this year from fees on checked bags — a 30 percent jump from the $270 million it raised last year.Continental recently raised its fees to $25 for the first checked bag and $35 for the second, although elite frequent fliers and some other customers don't have to pay.Houston-based Continental, the nation's No. 4 airline, is still thinking about growing by combining with another airline. Continental cut off merger talks with United Airlines a couple years ago, but both are now smaller in comparison to Delta, which acquired Northwest to become the world's largest airline."If we think it's in our best interest to bulk up defensively, we'll do so," Smisek said.Gosh, who would've guessed this would happen? I mean, besides anyone with a brain. Link to post Share on other sites
hblask 1 Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 The Internet, having reached it's pinnacle with this video, is now cancelled. Thank you for your time. Link to post Share on other sites
nutzbuster 7 Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 for those who may not venture to the blog section...Waterboarding.Is it torture?http://content1.clipmarks.com/content/7E8A...4-3A07CF501B7C/ Link to post Share on other sites
Acekob 0 Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 for those who may not venture to the blog section...Waterboarding.Is it torture?http://content1.clipmarks.com/content/7E8A...4-3A07CF501B7C/ Definitively. Link to post Share on other sites
chrozzo 19 Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 for those who may not venture to the blog section...Waterboarding.Is it torture?http://content1.clipmarks.com/content/7E8A...4-3A07CF501B7C/ i think they deserve it. Link to post Share on other sites
jeff_536 3 Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 for those who may not venture to the blog section...Waterboarding.Is it torture?http://content1.clipmarks.com/content/7E8A...4-3A07CF501B7C/ Define torture.I'd consider it psychological torture. Link to post Share on other sites
LongLiveYorke 38 Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Is it torture?Does Charlie Daniels play a mean fiddle? Link to post Share on other sites
Acekob 0 Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 Define torture.I'd consider it psychological torture.Torture ...any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him, or a third person, information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in, or incidental to, lawful sanctions. —UN Convention Against TortureWater boarding is the same as suffocating someone, If not stopped within 30+ seconds people can die.They tested CIA agents with the method, they lasted on average 14 seconds.Definitively torture. Link to post Share on other sites
coesillian 0 Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 I did follow the story when it came out, but is this what soldiers have been doing to prisoners? and people are supporting this? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now