AKProdigy 0 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) Poker Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FCP)UTG ($57.70)MP ($50)CO ($21.60)Button ($29.15)Hero ($55.05)BB ($43.75)Preflop: Hero is SB with Q , Q . 3 folds, Button calls $0.50, Hero raises to $2.5, BB calls $2, Button folds.Flop: ($5.75) J , 8 , 9 (2 players)Hero bets $5, BB raises to $41.25, Hero?No reads. Link to post Share on other sites
Moneyball16 0 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Call. We probably have the best hand and have enough outs when we are behind to make calling this profitable. Does anybody call here with QQ but fold AA or KK? I dont think I do but its closer. Link to post Share on other sites
pokerinc 0 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 looks like an "I has a great draw shovel" call and flip against 910sooted.i hate the new button limping. Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 3 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) Poker Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FCP)UTG ($57.70)MP ($50)CO ($21.60)Button ($29.15)Hero ($55.05)BB ($43.75)Preflop: Hero is SB with Q , Q . 3 folds, Button calls $0.50, Hero raises to $2.5, BB calls $2, Button folds.Flop: ($5.75) J , 8 , 9 (2 players)Hero bets $5, BB raises to $41.25, Hero?No reads.I am never ahead and never win calling shoves in this situation. Link to post Share on other sites
Temporary Nuts 1 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 I get the money in... and probably poop a little Link to post Share on other sites
king1305 0 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 I get the money in... and probably poop a littleGreat insight.This really looks very strong, two pair, a set, diamonds, straight cards, this is definitely a board that folding QQ is fine one. What someone mentioned earlier about this being more of a call with QQ then AA/KK is def right, and I would feel a lot better getting it in here if we had the Qd. Link to post Share on other sites
Snamuh 0 Posted July 25, 2008 Share Posted July 25, 2008 Despite all the draws, I think this is a fold with no reads. If he's an idiot, snap call. Link to post Share on other sites
whatgreatis 0 Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 Despite all the draws, I think this is a fold with no reads. If he's an idiot, snap call.Agree.Unless his range is rediccccc wide we pretty much have terrible equity against everything. We are far behind sets, straights and two pairs. When we are ahead, we aren't ahead by much, when we are behind, we are miles behind. Link to post Share on other sites
David_Nicoson 1 Posted July 27, 2008 Share Posted July 27, 2008 We break-even at 41%. Here's a range that looks about that. Board: Jd 8d 9hDead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 41.323% 40.74% 00.59% 15729 226.00 { QcQs }Hand 1: 58.677% 58.09% 00.59% 22429 226.00 { JJ-88, AdTd, Ad7d, Ad6d, KdQd, KdTd, QTs, J8s+, T9s, T7s, 98s } I'd probably call based on this, since he reraises JJ sometimes and folds T7s, imho. Link to post Share on other sites
Dictius 0 Posted July 28, 2008 Share Posted July 28, 2008 I'd sooner put AJ/KJ in his range than T7s. But it's hard to say since we have no information on this guy at all.It's unlikely that you are ever really far ahead and more likely that you are really far behind or close to a coin flip.It seems like a pretty marginal decision really. Call if you love variance. Link to post Share on other sites
David_Nicoson 1 Posted July 28, 2008 Share Posted July 28, 2008 I'd sooner put AJ/KJ in his range than T7s. But it's hard to say since we have no information on this guy at all.It's unlikely that you are ever really far ahead and more likely that you are really far behind or close to a coin flip.It seems like a pretty marginal decision really. Call if you love variance.If we put jacks without a draw in his range and take out the T7s, then we're a favorite and the call is very +EV. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now