Randy Reed 0 Posted July 23, 2008 Share Posted July 23, 2008 Last Year's Final Table Should Serve as Lesson to PuntersBodog has released betting odds for the final nine World Series of Poker main event players, and with a lack of any real superstar competitor among them, it’s no surprise that they directly reflect chip stacks.According to Bodog, the chip leader of the “November Nine” with 26.4 million, Dennis Phillips, and second-place Ivan Demidov, with 23.9 million, are the favorites at 3-1 to win the $9.2 million top prize.Scott Montgomery, with 19.3 million, is given odds of 4-1 to win. In February, he finished fifth in the World Poker Tour L.A. Poker Classic $10,000 championship event for $296,860, and the WSOP main event counts for his fourth cash at this year’s WSOP.Peter Eastgate, who sits with the same amount of chips at Montgomery, is 11-2 to win it. The main event is Eastgate’s third major cash.Both Ylon Schwartz and Darus Suharto also have about the same number of chips going into the final table (13 million), but Bodog is giving a nod to Schwartz, who’s getting 8-1 to win it. Suharto is getting slightly worse at 17-2. Bodog says the reason is that Schwartz is a veteran of the New York poker scene, while Suharto is an unknown. Schwartz also is a tournament poker veteran with more than 20 cashes.The bottom three players, as far as chip stacks are concerned, are Chino Rheem (10.8 million), Craig Marquis (6 million) and Kelly Kim (2.9 million), and their odds of winning in Bodog’s mind reflects the stiff challenge they face on Nov. 9.With a 40,000 chip ante and blinds at 150,000-300,000 when they return, those three fall right into the standardized definition of short-stacked. Rheem, one of the most succesful players of the final nine, is getting 19-2. Marquis is getting 10-1, and Kim is the longest shot of them all at 25-1.But looking at last year’s final table and how it shook out should be a lesson to those thinking about throwing a few shekels on their favorite players. The blinds and antes for the final table then were at the same level that they will be in November.Philip Hilm was the first player eliminated last year even though he started the table as the chip leader with 22 million. Jon Kalmar finished fifth, and he started the final table with the third-most chips (20 million).Alexander Kravchenko started the day in last place with 6.5 million and finished fourth. And Jerry Yang, the man who won it all, started with 8.4 million in chips. Less than an hour into the final table, he became chip leader by eliminating Hilm. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted July 23, 2008 Share Posted July 23, 2008 These numbers would seem to have been pulled out of someone's ass. Link to post Share on other sites
Suited_Up 2 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Rheem = decent bet? Link to post Share on other sites
kobe2odom8 14 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 my money is on jerry yang Link to post Share on other sites
OVERKILL 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 my money is on jerry yangI bet one mirrion dollrers Link to post Share on other sites
mk 11 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 damn i'd put money on craigmarq but 10:1 isn't very generous Link to post Share on other sites
nutzbuster 7 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 These numbers would seem to have been pulled out of someone's ass.Calcul's ass? Link to post Share on other sites
gfdsa146 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Rheem = decent bet?Its really too bad to see Rheem to get this far only to take home 1/20th of the prize money. As soon as he busts out, his money's gonna get chopped up 51 different ways being that so many people have pieces of him. Link to post Share on other sites
albasuna 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Its really too bad to see Rheem to get this far only to take home 1/20th of the prize money. As soon as he busts out, his money's gonna get chopped up 51 different ways being that so many people have pieces of him.lol that sucks. Link to post Share on other sites
cubsfan44 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Rheem = decent bet?I agree. He's got plenty of chips to be able to play imo too. Link to post Share on other sites
GrinderMJ 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 bet craig marquis Link to post Share on other sites
steve7stud 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Kelly Kim is a friend of mine. He is one of the nicest guys ever. Ironically, he is a super nit. So I was shocked that he made the final table. This type of success couldn't have gone to someone more deserving. He certainly has paid his dues. I hope he gets some amazing coaching and runs like God at the final table. Link to post Share on other sites
r0llin_game 1 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Kelly Kim is a friend of mine. He is one of the nicest guys ever. Ironically, he is a super nit. So I was shocked that he made the final table. This type of success couldn't have gone to someone more deserving. He certainly has paid his dues. I hope he gets some amazing coaching and runs like God at the final table.since he's a nit, are you saying don't bet him? Link to post Share on other sites
steve7stud 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 since he's a nit, are you saying don't bet him?I'm not saying one way or another. I have no clue what will happen and what type of coaching he gets. Way too many variables. 25-1 is a good price though. Link to post Share on other sites
CBass1724 1 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 bet biz markie Link to post Share on other sites
Randy Reed 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Author Share Posted July 24, 2008 Kelly Kim is a friend of mine. He is one of the nicest guys ever. Ironically, he is a super nit. So I was shocked that he made the final table. This type of success couldn't have gone to someone more deserving. He certainly has paid his dues. I hope he gets some amazing coaching and runs like God at the final table.Coach? I sooo want to see him shove all in the first ten hands or so! It would be funny to see him double up about 3 or 4 times and get the action started right. Great TV too haha Link to post Share on other sites
Sheiky 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 my money is on jerry yangI would say that's a pretty bad bet if Yahoo stock prices are anything to go by Link to post Share on other sites
govikes 0 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 I bet one mirrion dollrersafter he waits 15 minutes with the nuts Link to post Share on other sites
AmScray 355 Posted July 24, 2008 Share Posted July 24, 2008 Philips - 26.4m -- 88bb -- 3/1 (none) 29.3Demidov - 23.9m -- 80bb -- 3/1 -- (90.9) 26.6Montgomery - 19.3m -- 64bb -- 4/1 -- (80,72.7) 16Eastgate - 19.3m-- 64bb -- 5.5/1 -- (80,72.7) 11.63Schwartz - 13m- 43bb -- 8/1 -- (67.1(2),53.7,48.8) 5.375 Suharto - 13m- 43mm -- 8.5/1 -- (67.1(2),53.7,48.8) 5.05Rheem - 10.8m- 36bb -- 9.5-1 -- (83.3(2),56.2(2),45,40.9) 3.78Marquis - 6m- 20bb -- 10-1 -- (55.5,46.5(2),31.2(2),25,22.7) 2Kim - 2.9m- 10bb -- 25-1 -- (50,27.2,23.2(2)15.6(2),12.5,11.3) 0.4L to R:Name Total Stack Number of Starting Big Blinds The Line(What percentage starting stack represents of their higher opponents starting stacks, in ascending order)A ratio comprised of the line (reduced to X/1) divided by the number of starting big blindsAverage stack- 49.77bbPlayers above mean average: 4Players below mean average: 5A few things to consider.Other than Kim, everyones stack is reasonably effectual. The 2nd shortest stack is a double-up from being dead middle of the pack. There aren't any real gross disparities, Kim aside. Even the split between stack 1 and 2 is pretty slim (10.1%). There are no Jamie Golds. As we all know, relative skill between players is something that's displayed over periods of time. In what amounts to a 9 player SnG with unequal chip stacks, skill will play a role in nominal decision making, but the outcome will pretty much be determined by the cards, barring spectacular errors. I don't think that "skill level" is nearly as much of a factor as people seem to think it is here. BB/stack ratio is. The little metric beside the ascending percentages is a simple ratio that divides the line (reduced to a X/1 ratio) by the BB's going in. This establishes a "premium" metric we can worth with, as far as how the odds contrast with everyone starting position.As best I can tell, Jews carry a 15% premium over their opponents in poker because they combine superior reasoning with a fluent command of treachery (whereas other peoples tend to be 'hedgehogs'- one or the other- either treacherous 'people readers' or "math guys"). Jews, being both, must be priced accordingly. Ylon Schwartz has the "J Factor" going on, where J = (.15 + B) and B being the baseline price. Because of this, Ylon Schwartz is the pick with most value, since the line only gave an unduly small premium to Schwartz for J factor over his opponent with an equal stack. You can ignore the J factor if you want- all that bullshit about "equality" and all, but you do so at your own peril. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now