pele_br 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Pele:I'm curious as to why you have a FWP quote as your sig. You've been a member for 10 days, and I'm sure you don't know the kid from a hole in the wall. I'm not playing post count games with you, rather I'm wondering why you felt the need to quote him at the bottom of all your posts ?Snake,I am fully aware that post count gives you the right to "speak"; however, I have been lurking for 2 years and have followed threads in the OT, as well as the New Challenge (Old Challenge) for a very long time, and I feel that I do know many posters over here, even if they do not know me. From the top of my head I can name NoSup, Chrozzo, wsox, LoismustDie, brvheart etc. Even you I should add I was railing on Sunday on the 100k (stars SN arroz_feijao if you remember). Hope I don't sound like a ******, but people that post in public forums should be aware that many people read them, so there is a chance that I have read his posts.Having graduated from University, and with more time I decided to join the FCP community and participate. I see your point, and it did cross my mind that some posters would think that. It was Fluffdog that pointed out that someone should use that as a sig, and since I didn't have one, thought it might be funny (which I suppose is the point). Anyway, if you think I should change it let me know, I'll try and find something else. Hope this is an adequate response Link to post Share on other sites
pele_br 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Fluffdog asked someone to put that quote in their sig. He, apparently, obliged.Defence calls witness number 1: Link to post Share on other sites
dbrent2 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 GL! Silently railing.Nice SIG! Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 tournaments are for suckers....? Link to post Share on other sites
mase_gotsem 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 she won more races in that 1 sng then iv won this year ?? Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 she won more races in that 1 sng then iv won this year ?? i'm at hand 52 now, and ya, i gotta say, must be nice to hit when u need too, she tried to steal the limps w 9,7 and 6,6 called her Link to post Share on other sites
juggalo41729 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 any way to see this video without payin? Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 any way to see this video without payin?click the link posted by the guy a few posts down from the top in page 1 Link to post Share on other sites
DrZoidberg 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 any way to see this video without payin?you can sign up for free, you don't have to pay Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 her J,5 hand vs A,8 double up was pretty huge Hand 176. blind or not, it def helps to win with junkgod, only half way done and shes won 3 35/65 all ins. I wish i could run this good Link to post Share on other sites
simo_8ball 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 I think the overwhelming message is that when aipf Jack high>>>Ace high Link to post Share on other sites
mase_gotsem 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 LOL did u finish watching it royal ? does she not run ubber good? i used to always think im an unlucky person and watching this i definetly think now some ppl ar luckier than others Link to post Share on other sites
Ecclesbury 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Good idea this, I might try it. I think winning it or even final tabling takes one hell of a lot of luck since by playing blind you are only working on one aspect of your game, by removing other aspects so you clearly can't be playing to your full potential. Link to post Share on other sites
hblask 1 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 tournaments are for suckers....? Link to post Share on other sites
irishguy 14 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 I think its funny how many people on here are saying this isn't very hard while on other sites some of the highest ranked players are going on and on about how incredible a feat this is. Yes she ran good but she also put on a clinic on playing position and selective aggression. As far as why 3/4 handed she was folding often from the small blind, I believe this has more to do with gigabets chip rotations theory and playing pots mainly in position. Link to post Share on other sites
Ecclesbury 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Yes she ran good but she also put on a clinic on playing position and selective aggression.Correct. Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Judging by the boldness of some of her plays, I think its safe to say she does this on a regular basis. Jump in some cheap 4.40's, play em blind, eventually u do enough of them and you'll have times where u run good, and end up going deep, or in this case, winning.Its impossible to know if a standard raise from MP is weak or strong preflop, yet she pushed from Button all in preflop a couple times in that situation, and MP folded.so those few times + her running hot with the 35/65 wins, = having to do this multiple times until u bank a win and can post it online to the world.But, she still did manage to play some sick poker in the other times. meaning, if she was looking at her cards, i have no doubts she woulda won anyways Link to post Share on other sites
AAsnake88 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Snake,I am fully aware that post count gives you the right to "speak"; however, I have been lurking for 2 years and have followed threads in the OT, as well as the New Challenge (Old Challenge) for a very long time, and I feel that I do know many posters over here, even if they do not know me. From the top of my head I can name NoSup, Chrozzo, wsox, LoismustDie, brvheart etc. Even you I should add I was railing on Sunday on the 100k (stars SN arroz_feijao if you remember). Hope I don't sound like a ******, but people that post in public forums should be aware that many people read them, so there is a chance that I have read his posts.Having graduated from University, and with more time I decided to join the FCP community and participate. I see your point, and it did cross my mind that some posters would think that. It was Fluffdog that pointed out that someone should use that as a sig, and since I didn't have one, thought it might be funny (which I suppose is the point). Anyway, if you think I should change it let me know, I'll try and find something else. Hope this is an adequate responseI was just curious, it's all good. I wouldn't ask you to change it no matter your reason for having it anyway. Link to post Share on other sites
Sunny 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 This was her first attempt. Link to post Share on other sites
dtblizz 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 OK, I'm sort of trying this, and I'm now even more convinced that either she is the biggest luckbox in the world, or this was like her 100th try. The reason: because people folded to her raises. That doesn't happen in real 4.40s. Whenever I'm in position, there are 3 or 4 limpers to me, and they all call the raise, whether 3x or 6x. Almost every all-in push by anyone at the table is met with at least one and maybe two callers. I've played a lot of these, and they just don't work like the one she shows. They just don't, at least not until the final 30 players or so.And I'm not just compaining because I'm losing, because I'm actually in pretty good shape. I'm just saying, they rarely play like that one.She rarely plays when limpers are in before her. She does it sometimes but the majority of the time she is folding if there are limpers. Link to post Share on other sites
hblask 1 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 She rarely plays when limpers are in before her. She does it sometimes but the majority of the time she is folding if there are limpers.That was (part of) my point... it is so rare to have less than 3 limpers to me if I'm on the button or C/O that it is not even a factor, at least until about the blinds reach 100/200. The one I played last night I had a more-than-triple up in the first 10 minutes that got me past the all-limping-all-the-time stage, so it didn't kill me to fold to the limpers. But she seemed to have a run where it was open to her quite frequently on the button, even in the early stages. Where do I get opponents like that? I think shortly into the second hour is where playing blind would really start to show it's true value. Link to post Share on other sites
WhatArunAA 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 Judging by the boldness of some of her plays, I think its safe to say she does this on a regular basis. Jump in some cheap 4.40's, play em blind, eventually u do enough of them and you'll have times where u run good, and end up going deep, or in this case, winning.Its impossible to know if a standard raise from MP is weak or strong preflop, yet she pushed from Button all in preflop a couple times in that situation, and MP folded.so those few times + her running hot with the 35/65 wins, = having to do this multiple times until u bank a win and can post it online to the world.But, she still did manage to play some sick poker in the other times. meaning, if she was looking at her cards, i have no doubts she woulda won anywaysI played 1 blind.. yesterday.. and won it... i had to stop playing blind final 5 so I guess it doesnt count as "truly blind" Link to post Share on other sites
pele_br 0 Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 I was just curious, it's all good. I wouldn't ask you to change it no matter your reason for having it anyway.Good to know. I'll change and leave it as a backup sig till I earn some more respect. Link to post Share on other sites
jcashx36x 0 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 You know how theres the argument in the supreme court that POKEr is not a skill game its all luck???Can this video be submitted to the HOUSE (or whoever needs to see it) and save ONLINE POKER? Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 You know how theres the argument in the supreme court that POKEr is not a skill game its all luck???Can this video be submitted to the HOUSE (or whoever needs to see it) and save ONLINE POKER?No, because she wins 3 all in's where she is the 40/60 dog and she pulls through Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now