thebottomline

It was on during the WSOP where Daniel was playing in a LOT of tournaments. These guys are cash game players and as such weren't busy in tournaments at all. I think I read in Townsends blog that he expects the game to run again next year during the WSOP, which would mean Daniel would probably miss it if he continues his bracelet bet (which I think he will).

0 for 3.

"3 being bluffs" how is that the case when one of these 'bluffs' looks like taking a pot down pre flop with AQ..?

No, seriously. And theres some guy call sbrugby and another called aba something too.

Lol.

Commentary = sucks.

It's been noted that the same guys dumped a couple of hundred thousand to unknown player names in the last few days.Also, it's been noted that this whole problem has happened since their software update.

Circumstantial evidence that this is true, but no proof? Second one doesn't work due to bandwidth for me. It is a small number of hands, but winning 311 BB/100 hands? Also, if you read the 2+2 thread and view the HH and see all the PT stats, it's pretty much cast iron stuff. IMO, it can be nothing other than cheating.

Looking on Pokernews, is McCullough the guy that got it all in with KK against QQ, then a Q flopped and he hit a King on the river to double up?

He withdrew loads on FTP but lost what he left, then redeposited. Went down in stakes in HU NLHE not because he couldn't afford it, but because he wanted to get his HU game back on track. He was (is) still playing the highest stakes ring games in NLHE and never stopped playing the high stakes PLO O/8.Christ there is so much written about him that is wrong, or misconstrued.

Yes. Because any big pair is a huge favourite mathematically over it, so when they lose, it is a surprised. I think that's highly unlikely. But also, is Doyle Brunson a donk? 1) AA pre flop is the nuts.2) Um, if you get it in with the best of it and get sucked out on it is not a mistake or a bad play. 78 cracking Aces is a suck out.

If you were repping AK checking the river isn't good.. IMO. I think a bet on the river wins it.

Huge double up, DN getting 95.5k double up plus whatever was already in the pot. Should be up to around 200k with that hand.

I actually really like this broadcast. It's more of a 'real' feel about it. No hole card cam, no commentary, just the table talk and what you can see, just like when you're playing live yourself. I really like it.

Well your first sentence proves my point. In this thread you seem to have put a higher impetus on being a good embassador than anything else. Like I said, what he did was well within the rules, so I see no reason to look down upon him. He may have gotten Daniel off his game, which, I'll say again, he did within the rules. If thats helped him strategically then I don't see why it's bad that he did it. His verbal wasn't even that bad, IMO. Matusow, Hellmuth etc constantly berate any player that makes a bad play or gets unlucky. It most certainly works for them when they piss people off. Are they

If you call your within your right to see what they had, IMO. If you call online it automatically turns them over, if the player in the hand asks I don't see it as TOO bad. If you've ever made an information call you'd want to see the hand, right?

Any idea on DNs chip count? Trying to get on Pokernews but it isn't loading properly for me.

Ok, fair enough. I thought it was online as well.

I don't mean to harp back to this point but that is obsurd. I heard that there was a new 25% tax coming in but taxing you as soon as you cash? How is that possible? I thought it should be taxed when you cash out, as unless I'm mistaken you can claim back your tournament buy-ins, and if you were to use that money for bigger tournament buy-ins you now couldn't. Also, I live in England, and as this is (as far as I'm aware) a strictly US tax, what happens to us foreigners who play on FT, Stars, etc?I don't mean to sound like I'm directly asking you, NoSup, I'm just venting and hoping someone can s

Anyone else finding it really quiet?

I still disagree. While you may have a lot of places to eat out healthily, I still think it is better here in England. In general shops and newsagents the amount of healthy eating food is far greater than I remember it being in USA like a year ago, which was also in NYC. I'd take the amount of healthy eating options we have in Hotels, Restaurants AND grocery stores over what I remember in NYC any time. If you eat out healthily every night it'd be pretty unhealthy for your bank balance.Oh, and GL Daniel. I hope you're enjoying your time in England (British Airways aside...)

I live in England. English women are gooooooooooood... Actually, 'butter wouldn't melt' means that they're innocent looking. Luton, England, has the highest %age of Indians outside of India, and white British males are now in the minority in quite a few large English towns and Cities.But I'm glad Daniel has pointed out that he likes the food. Having been to the US and in England, theres a lot more healthy eating options in England, and even the non-healthy options are better here, for my money. That may be due to growing up with them, but I don't think so. Plus we have 500ml beer cans here!

OR people see;September 10th WSOP No Limit Hold'emAnd assume he's playing on the tenth. Jee, what an idiot I am. Or what a jackass you are. I can quite decide.

I was just looking at the WSOPE ME updates on Pokernews, and couldn't find anything about how DN was doing, and saw no updates on here. It says in DNs schedule that he's playing this, so I was wondering if he had made a U-turn on his decision to play?http://www.pokernews.com/live-reporting/20...ope-main-event/

Wow. I stay out of flame wars if I can on forums, but you really are a moron. Re-read my post and think about your response. I said any table talk thats within the rules is fine, I said DN himself has said his jokey persona has helped him. Then your response is;'I don't see any point where this guy was being funny or anybody was laughing. Point rendered, invalid.'Idiot. I gave a logical post that I think pretty much closed the matter, instead of actually continuing conversation on the point or arguing your case you decided to completely misread my post, probably in a rush to bitch at Lois, the