mrfritz 887 Posted March 4, 2016 Author Share Posted March 4, 2016 I'll take it again and post it. Link to post Share on other sites
Spademan 94 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 I'll take it again and post it. Suhweet. Link to post Share on other sites
Spademan 94 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Bernie and Hillary 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Scrim 115 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 No joke, I'm a commie serial killer. I had Cruz, Trump, Sanders, Clinton and Rubio all clustered between 6X% and 7X%. I think what threw them was my write in answer for abortion: the government shouldn't concern itself with abortion, but it makes sense to evaluate the actual abortress herself and regulate the process based on how she performs in IQ tests. The most disturbing thing about abortion isn't the process itself. It's that it's always the wrong women who are and aren't having them. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
SuperJon 175 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 I did some thinking, and took the test again. This time I got 80 Hilary / 77 Berns / 70 Rubio. My ideology is Centrist, leaning just a hair to the left. Link to post Share on other sites
mrfritz 887 Posted March 5, 2016 Author Share Posted March 5, 2016 I had Cruz, Trump, Sanders, Clinton and Rubio all clustered between 6X% and 7X%. I think what threw them was my write in answer for abortion: the government shouldn't concern itself with abortion, but it makes sense to evaluate the actual abortress herself and regulate the process based on how she performs in IQ tests. The most disturbing thing about abortion isn't the process itself. It's that it's always the wrong women who are and aren't having them. That's pretty much what I got. A little different from the first time I took it, but not much. http://www.isidewith...?from=Ads2JWdVP Link to post Share on other sites
Spademan 94 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 I did some thinking, and took the test again. This time I got 80 Hilary / 77 Berns / 70 Rubio. My ideology is Centrist, leaning just a hair to the left. Milquetoast. But hey, if you're center-left, and least you're left of Obama. This makes you indistinguishable from marxist kenyan socialist communist godless homosexual pc SJW multiculturalist white-genociding pinko's to far-right people anyway. That's pretty much what I got. A little different from the first time I took it, but not much. http://www.isidewith...?from=Ads2JWdVP lol, you agree with like, everybody on everything. So weird. -- I see now what's happening. You're like pretty strong on "security" over "privacy" and "globalism" over "protectionism" - but strong for "socialism" over "capitalism". So you have some really right-leaning ideas and some really left leaning ideas. Interesting stuff. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Sounds like Fritz is a Stalinist 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Scrim 115 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 The left-right paradigm is mostly bullshit. It's too defined (and perverted) by political sheep-herding strategy Link to post Share on other sites
Dubey 1,035 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 early super Saturday results looking really bad for Trump. Possible he has hit his first real stumbling block here. Unfortunately it looks like Cruz is the one cashing in. Link to post Share on other sites
Spademan 94 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 early super Saturday results looking really bad for Trump. Possible he has hit his first real stumbling block here. His last debate performance was a disaster. Link to post Share on other sites
Scrim 115 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 Not true on Sanders. Roosevelt was absolutely a crypto. Link to post Share on other sites
Scrim 115 Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 I'm starting to realize that the only thing more fun than trolling leftists with the ascent of Trump is trolling Trump supporters with the descent of Trump. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted March 6, 2016 Share Posted March 6, 2016 The Onion from 2012 with a Kreskin like prediction http://www.theonion.com/video/after-obama-victory-shrieking-white-hot-sphere-of--30284 Link to post Share on other sites
BigDMcGee 3,352 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 I went to the Nebraska Caucus, and it was a shit show. I went out of pure curiosity because I'd never been to a Caucus before, and wasn't registered in Nebraska in 2008 ( at least in March of 2008). I thought it might be fun. It was not fun. First of all these Bernie dipshits were trying to get me to take a sign and wear a sticker and shoved their signs in my face that annoyed me. Second, it was a much bigger crowd than they anticipated, they crammed us into the elementary school gym. It was full of smelly, ugly nebraskans. I swear to god this is the ugliest ****ing state in the country. I was told to get there early, because the doors would close at 6, so I got there around 5:40. I hate waiting in lines, and I hate standing around doing nothing in crowds, there was enough chairs for 10% of the crowd and I didn't get there near early enough to be in that 10% So I was already angry and tired of standing around when 6 rolled around. And they didn't shut the doors. They kept letting people in till 6:10, and I am growing increasingly impatient and angry.. it seems to me, all you have to do is stand on one side of the gym or the other, and let the people count you, and leave. It shouldn't take any time at all. So around 6:15, someone finally addresses the crowd and says that they'd begin momentarily, but they were having some issues with some registrations. I think they were literally registering new voters, which to my mind should be " tough shit, better luck next 4 or 8 years", but they were having some issue that they needed to fix. And once they fixed it, before they herded us to one side of the gym or the other, they needed to read a statement from the Nebraska Democratic party... BUT.. before they would even do that... they had everyone say THE PLEDGE OF ****ING ALLEGIANCE. My eyeroll was audible.. I hadn't done the pledge since like Jr high. They had everyone stand and face the flag, which was to my immediate right, so this whole gym was staring in my direction while they recited the pledge like zombies.. I did not look at the flag, I did not raise my hand to my heart, and I did not say the pledge.. I just loomed over the crowd, staring them all in the face, silently judging them for acting like republicans. So then, 6:30 rolled around, and they still hadn't read the ****ing statement letter from the Democratic party and at that point, I'd had enough and just left. I didn't even care that much, I just went there because I thought it would be fun and it was the opposite of fun, I know Hilary's going to win the nomination, Nebraska has basically no votes, what few votes they do have are proportional, so the winner is only going to net like 2-5 delegates, so why the **** am I standing around in this smelly gym with these ugly people, when it doesn't even matter who we vote for ( bernie won the state 55-45%. He netted 3 delegates. gratz). I'm thinking of registering as a republican for next election cycle, because they have to be more attractive than this bunch of white, middle aged, tweedy douche bags and hipsters. I will never caucus again. In fact, I will vote against any democratic candidate that doesn't support going back to a primary. I have now become a one-issue voter. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,752 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 Every caucus that I've ever been too has happened in exactly that fashion. My in-laws were at their caucus from 6-9pm. 9. Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,752 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 Now this has got to produce some interesting feelings among democrats/SJW's: http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/07/caitlyn-jenner-hillary-clinton-couldnt-care-less-about-women/ Link to post Share on other sites
Spademan 94 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 Heh. Nebraska. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Spademan 94 Posted March 7, 2016 Share Posted March 7, 2016 Now this has got to produce some interesting feelings among democrats/SJW's: http://dailycaller.c...ss-about-women/ No, no it doesn't. Most people know Jenner is a right-wing, Cruz loving moron, politically. Why would her saying right-wing shit "produce interesting feelings" among democrats and people who tell people not to be assholes? Link to post Share on other sites
SuitedAces21 2,722 Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 that's what you get Magee, for giving a fvck when it aint your turn. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,752 Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 No, no it doesn't. Ok. Link to post Share on other sites
Scrim 115 Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 Ok. The whole Transvestism schtick is simply a way to stay on the famewagon, now that his gig with the Kardashian concubines is over. He isn't an actual tranny. It's just Bruce Jenner in Drag. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now