Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I feel like you're just talking out of your ass.It's an assumption, but almost certainly valid.
What? We're 'assuming' a certain corporate structure of the farm. That might seem to be a stretch, since there are many corporate structures available to companies. I was arguing it isn't really a stretch, since all but one of those structures would be illegal or illogical given what we know - that it is a family farm with non-operational shareholders.More relevantly, I agree we're now arguing about nothing.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...