r23y 2 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 What are your thoughts on the rounders sequel . Link to post Share on other sites
slink 1 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 I think it would be a good idea. Link to post Share on other sites
loogie 115 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 It's going to be a steaming pile. Link to post Share on other sites
king_tanner 84 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 It's going to be a steaming pile.I guess if Matt Damon is agreeing to be in a sequel the script has to be decent, but I really can't see where they are going to go with it. So steaming pile imo. Link to post Share on other sites
JubilantLankyLad 1,957 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 This thread needs more SJ. Link to post Share on other sites
r23y 2 Posted January 29, 2011 Author Share Posted January 29, 2011 I was just wandering.In the new card player magazine they say that Weinstien company will be working this.plus a few other follow up movies.Bad SantaThird clerksShakespeare in love Link to post Share on other sites
Balloon guy 158 Posted January 29, 2011 Share Posted January 29, 2011 I'm sorry John, I still can't remember. Link to post Share on other sites
GeneralGeeWhiz 0 Posted January 30, 2011 Share Posted January 30, 2011 I'm sorry John, I still can't remember. but yeah.... it sounds like it will suck. i hope worm is somehow in it, Link to post Share on other sites
ajs510 122 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 Same writers, Damon and Norton both "committed" in principle...the sequel has those things going for it. Only reason I'm not tattooing "FAIL" on the movie's forehead yet. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 It's going to be a steaming pile.I'm with Ebert. The first one wasn't exactly better than average, either... Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 It'll probably be just ok, like most movies, but at least with those actors it has potential. I'm not ready to write it off just because iit's an unnecesary sequel. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 It'll probably be just ok, like most movies, but at least with those actors it has potential. I'm not ready to write it off just because iit's an unnecesary sequel.This is pretty much how I feel. I recognize that the first movie wasn't great or anything but it was entertaining to me becuase it's about something I'm interested in and had a bunch of good actors in it and wasn't horrible. Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 What I'd be worried about is that the writers won't realize poker is no longer underground and/or cool. I'm afraid it'll be like that awful ESPN show that seemed to only exist in order to use as much overplayed poker terminology as possible. Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted January 31, 2011 Share Posted January 31, 2011 What I'd be worried about is that the writers won't realize poker is no longer underground and/or cool. I'm afraid it'll be like that awful ESPN show that seemed to only exist in order to use as much overplayed poker terminology as possible.The Rounders writers also wrote Tilt the ESPN show you're talking about as well as such other classics as Knockaround Guys, the Walking Tall sequal and Ocean's 13.http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0002718/http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0505522/ Link to post Share on other sites
speedz99 145 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 The Rounders writers also wrote TiltOh...no. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now