Jump to content

Spot In A 3.40 Stt Sng


Recommended Posts

PokerStars Game #26940560195: Tournament #154829085, $3.00+$0.40 Hold'em No Limit - Level IX (300/600) - 2009/04/10 14:34:29 ETTable '154829085 1' 10-max Seat #5 is the buttonSeat 5: Bastek2003 (870 in chips) Seat 6: ADZ126 (3202 in chips) Seat 9: gametymer (10928 in chips) Bastek2003: posts the ante 50ADZ126: posts the ante 50gametymer: posts the ante 50ADZ126: posts small blind 300gametymer: posts big blind 600*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to gametymer [Jc Qs]Bastek2003: raises 220 to 820 and is all-inADZ126: folds gametymer: folds Uncalled bet (220) returned to Bastek2003Bastek2003 collected 1650 from potADZ126 said, "omgfold"*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 1650 | Rake 0 Seat 5: Bastek2003 (button) collected (1650)Seat 6: ADZ126 (small blind) folded before FlopSeat 9: gametymer (big blind) folded before FlopADZ is a 3.40 reg, so thoughts on the fold?

Link to post
Share on other sites
PokerStars Game #26940560195: Tournament #154829085, $3.00+$0.40 Hold'em No Limit - Level IX (300/600) - 2009/04/10 14:34:29 ETTable '154829085 1' 10-max Seat #5 is the buttonSeat 5: Bastek2003 (870 in chips) Seat 6: ADZ126 (3202 in chips) Seat 9: gametymer (10928 in chips) Bastek2003: posts the ante 50ADZ126: posts the ante 50gametymer: posts the ante 50ADZ126: posts small blind 300gametymer: posts big blind 600*** HOLE CARDS ***Dealt to gametymer [Jc Qs]Bastek2003: raises 220 to 820 and is all-inADZ126: folds gametymer: folds Uncalled bet (220) returned to Bastek2003Bastek2003 collected 1650 from potADZ126 said, "omgfold"*** SUMMARY ***Total pot 1650 | Rake 0 Seat 5: Bastek2003 (button) collected (1650)Seat 6: ADZ126 (small blind) folded before FlopSeat 9: gametymer (big blind) folded before FlopADZ is a 3.40 reg, so thoughts on the fold?
lol really?
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was 4 handed i could maybe see an arguement for folding so you could continue to steal from the medium stacks but ummm with those odds folding is bad always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I'm getting a bajillion:1 to make the call, but it is EV+ to fold correctly assuming that both will be folding the next orbits. I know looking at it, it's a bad fold, but it turned out +EV. The next question is, when we call, do we hope we lose?

Link to post
Share on other sites
I know I'm getting a bajillion:1 to make the call, but it is EV+ to fold correctly assuming that both will be folding the next orbits. I know looking at it, it's a bad fold, but it turned out +EV. The next question is, when we call, do we hope we lose?
I think you are thinking too hard. You play to get itm. Once you are itm throw all this thinking out the window and play to win. Folding qj there is horrendus no matter how you slice it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
If you think your heads up game sucks, fold.
But it's not like they're deepstacked. Basically it's going to be about flips HU with the blind sizes. So either way he should be calling.
Link to post
Share on other sites
If you think your heads up game sucks, fold.
I don't see how your heads up game can suck in these situations. Unless you're just retarded.I know where Cody is coming from in this hand but I think he's way off and overall it's not good, despite what he may rationally think. If you run the numbers somehow on this situations and the resulting situation if you fold I think you'lll find it's waaaaay better to call, like not even remotely close. I'm not sure this is even a great idea on a bubble, although it would defintely be closer.If he's levelling me on aim as well as in here, then fml.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...