mdroc1 0 Posted December 7, 2007 Share Posted December 7, 2007 It seems fairly easy to calculate the anticipated rake in a live game and work out what you're up against.I saw a game the other day that carries a $10 per hour time charge per player, 10% rake capped at $6 and there are probably about 25 hands an hour dealt. If we assume that the rake averages around $4 a pot, that's $100 an hour in rake + $90 an hour time changes. In a nine player table, each player is paying around $21 per hour on average. So that's fine.Now let's say I told you the game was $2/$5 no limit and the maximum buy in is $500, is it possible to calculate the degree to which the game is beatable factoring in the rake. Obviously, one needs to make more than $21 per hour. But in this game, do you think you could determine whether $35 per hour on average overall would be a realistic and sustainable target? Link to post Share on other sites
Temporary Nuts 1 Posted December 7, 2007 Share Posted December 7, 2007 Time charge?GHEY!! Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted December 7, 2007 Share Posted December 7, 2007 Time charge AND $6 pot rake???Stay away from that place.In order to break even in that game, you'd need to win $21/hr in a rake free environment, aka 4.2 big bets per 25 hands, or 16.8 big bets/100 (8.4 ptbb/100). That's a pretty tough winrate to sustain online, but I imagine in a live environment where the games are softer, it could be done.That's a retardo rake structure though.Ps - $35/hr (on top of rake?) would be 11.2 big bets/hr, or 44.8 big bets/100 (22.4 ptbb/100), and would be pretty unrealistic, unless I'm overestimating live games. Link to post Share on other sites
Pot Odds RAC 23 Posted December 7, 2007 Share Posted December 7, 2007 OP, are you CERTAIN that there was a Rake AND a Session Fee? Link to post Share on other sites
dms26 3 Posted December 7, 2007 Share Posted December 7, 2007 It seems fairly easy to calculate the anticipated rake in a live game and work out what you're up against.I saw a game the other day that carries a $10 per hour time charge per player, 10% rake capped at $6 and there are probably about 25 hands an hour dealt.A time charge and rake? Stay the hell away from that place. Link to post Share on other sites
kingdbag 0 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I think last time I was in Atlantic City the Borgata charged like $5 every dealer change so 2 per hour $10 bucks (1/2 NL) but they didn't take any rake from the pots... What do you guys think about that kinda structure? I thought it was kinda shitty and didn't like that they do that. Link to post Share on other sites
Acid_Knight 2 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I have never heard of a game where it's raked and there's a time charge.From what I remember, every Limit Holdem game 20/40 and up that I've ever seen has a time charge in lieu of raking the pots. The same applies for all 5/10 NL games and above here in Vegas. They do time charge because it's faster and it means having fewer smaller chips on the table since there are never $1 or $5 chips in the pot at a 5/10 or 10/20 NL game.All games below those are usually raked per pot. Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 3 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 It seems fairly easy to calculate the anticipated rake in a live game and work out what you're up against.I saw a game the other day that carries a $10 per hour time charge per player, 10% rake capped at $6 and there are probably about 25 hands an hour dealt. If we assume that the rake averages around $4 a pot, that's $100 an hour in rake + $90 an hour time changes. In a nine player table, each player is paying around $21 per hour on average. So that's fine.Now let's say I told you the game was $2/$5 no limit and the maximum buy in is $500, is it possible to calculate the degree to which the game is beatable factoring in the rake. Obviously, one needs to make more than $21 per hour. But in this game, do you think you could determine whether $35 per hour on average overall would be a realistic and sustainable target?This is an insane, almost unbeatable game over the long haul. Link to post Share on other sites
David_Nicoson 1 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I played at a casino with a rake and $5 "seating fee". I emphasize once.I personally prefer rake to time charge, because I like the flexibility of leaving whenever without feeling that I'm waisting my time charge fee. Plus I'm tighter than average so I end up getting a slightly better deal. Link to post Share on other sites
mtdesmoines 3 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I played at a casino with a rake and $5 "seating fee". I emphasize once.I personally prefer rake to time charge, because I like the flexibility of leaving whenever without feeling that I'm waisting my time charge fee. Plus I'm tighter than average so I end up getting a slightly better deal.That, and when it's raked, you don't have to play hands and pay. Seating fee, you pay no matter what. Link to post Share on other sites
NoBBiR 0 Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 A time charge and rake? Stay the hell away from that place.I'd rather kill myself than play in that place, Christ. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now