Jump to content

Us Politics For Betting (Not Talking About Politics)


Recommended Posts

I haven't read the article but probably agree with it. I disagree with bob. I don't know how you can consider someone who was imprisoned in a torture facility for his entire adult life an "enemy combatant".

 

what makes him an enemy combantant was that he was fighting with our enemy in combat against us. He was a child soldier in combat.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I was going to let this slide, but I just watched the video in question again and I just can't.   You watched a black man almost moved to tears as he passionately talked about an election and a coun

Most of you know that I am a fiscal conservative. If you didn't, you know now. I didn't vote for Trump and Im pretty sure I wouldn't have voted for Bernie Sanders. Would have looked for a 3rd candidat

My aunt used to foster parent children. I don't know how many she had, but I'd guess a few.   The last one she had she ended up adopting and now she's my cousin and she's awesome. She's early in he

 

 

what makes him an enemy combantant was that he was fighting with our enemy in combat against us. He was a child soldier in combat.

 

If "enemy combatant" has a legal definition, I'm guessing a 9-year old doesn't qualify under it.

 

And it's not normal or legal to hold enemy combatants who have no useful information indefinitely without trial in foreign torture jails, especially when they are well below adulthood.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If "enemy combatant" has a legal definition, I'm guessing a 9-year old doesn't qualify under it.

 

And it's not normal or legal to hold enemy combatants who have no useful information indefinitely without trial in foreign torture jails, especially when they are well below adulthood.

 

huh ? He was 15 at the time he was captured.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Anybody out there have an 8-year-old child? One of mine is 9. You know and I know that it’s an age when kids adore their fathers and try to please them. Why would we think that such a child, exposed by his father to violent ideologies, was old enough to have known better by age 15? With that grooming, that child would have no chance."

 

I agree with this graph

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you think he even had an opportunity to say no at any point? I'm not sure if you are being serious or not Wayne but I couldn't disagree more.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

do you think he even had an opportunity to say no at any point? I'm not sure if you are being serious or not Wayne but I couldn't disagree more.

 

That is fine but imo he is held accountable for his actions. Sad that it is in his awful world and to have a dad like that

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

That is fine but imo he is held accountable for his actions. Sad that it is in his awful world and to have a dad like that

 

The money he was awarded is about holding the Canadian government accountable for their actions (or lack of).

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

That is fine but imo he is held accountable for his actions. Sad that it is in his awful world and to have a dad like that

 

It would be pretty extreme for a 15-year old to be tried as an adult. Even more extraordinarily so if it could be shown that his parents encouraged the behaviour.

 

I think that's all missing the point though. He wasn't tried. How long was he held in a facility known for torture and war crimes without even a trial, or charges, or even a presentation of evidence? He was a Canadian citizen and he was denied the most basic rights being a Canadian is supposed to include.

 

Even if we ignore his age, unless you believe that Canada has been at war for the past 15 years AND there was reason to believe Khadr held useful intelligence, there's no legal basis for holding him in a foreign prison for that long without charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The money he was awarded is about holding the Canadian government accountable for their actions (or lack of).

 

Yes lack of it, I understand. War crimes are brutal. History shows it.

 

I knew he had a winning case and that is why the lawyer housed him since he knew the windfall at the end of the rainbow.

 

IMO, was it the right call. Yes under Canadian law it was, but I personally can't stomach it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Yes lack of it, I understand. War crimes are brutal. History shows it.

 

I knew he had a winning case and that is why the lawyer housed him since he knew the windfall at the end of the rainbow.

 

IMO, was it the right call. Yes under Canadian law it was, but I personally can't stomach it.

 

To be clear, even for someone like myself in the minority position of strongly agreeing with the decision, I think it is very reasonable for people to feel nauseated by it. I actually applaud people like Wayne (and probably others) who are able to look past the ugly headlines to consider the merits - I'd certainly be hard-pressed to do the same if the situation was reversed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, was it the right call. Yes under Canadian law it was, but I personally can't stomach it.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Khadr

 

In October 2010, Khadr pleaded guilty to "murder in violation of the laws of war" and four other charges at a hearing before a United States military commission.[3][4][5][6][7] The charges were created under the Military Commission Act of 2006 and considered by the US to be war crimes, although they are not recognized as war crimes under international law, and the act was not in place at the time that the alleged offenses were committed.[

 

And iirc he was the only one charged under the act. Also given that he was 15 at the time this really stinks -- and the fact they tortured him. Ya..

 

We seem to be digging a deeper and deeper hole of radicalization -- stuff like this doesn't help. Two wrongs don't make a right, etc, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

It's "funny" sifting through this thread and seeing how many of us called this Presidency almost perfectly. I've been greatly annoyed almost every day for the past 207 days but today was disgusting. It's taking all my will power not to tell my few Trump supporter friends to eff off. Luckily for them they've been abnormally quiet the last 60 days or so.

 

What a mess...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freedom of speech is under attack and people don't even realize it.

 

I don't understand why some people hate others just because of the colour of their skin, but I fully support their right to voice it in a non-violent manner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...