Actuary 3 Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 Almost a 7 BB pot on the river with an overpair and no paired board?I've seen sillier plays than the ol' river check/raise with air... on a board that straightens out... with a hand that can be read fairly easily as "playing defense" from the betting.so he saves all the aggression for a river c/r bluff?Stating you have seen worse in no way means it's a worse hand 1/10 timesMaybe you play at donkier sites. Link to post Share on other sites
TJ_Eckleburg 0 Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 no sw?Calling a c/r is really bad.And I solicit opinions on the QQ hand and later in the thread gave reason why I think c/c was probably betterI'd rather make a bet-sized river mistake than a pot-sized river mistake.This is also a great spot for Villain to bluff.I respectfully submit that we have to call a river check/raise. Link to post Share on other sites
TJ_Eckleburg 0 Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 so he saves all the aggression for a river c/r bluff?Stating you have seen worse in no way means it's a worse hand 1/10 timesMaybe you play at donkier sites.We've represented overpair the whole way and the board just straightened out. I would even go so far as to say A9 c/r'ing the river would be a fairly solid calculated risk... especially against tight/passives. Link to post Share on other sites
Zach6668 513 Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 Meh, Actuary, just go back to being passive. Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 c/r river bluffs are very rare,you are trying to manufacture circumstances that dont happen enoughFor one thing, except the A9s, there is no hand that plays this passively the whole way then all of a sudden becomes a river c/.r bluffernot enough at least.but its a lost cause.We will agree to disagree Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 Meh, Actuary, just go back to being passive.20/11/1.4I'd say I haven't changed. Link to post Share on other sites
finztotheleft 0 Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 100% standard.I 3-bet worse than TT there preflop. Link to post Share on other sites
CoranMoran 0 Posted May 24, 2007 Share Posted May 24, 2007 20/11/1.4I'd say I haven't changed.What AF do you guys consider "standard"?Where do you draw the line between passive and aggressive?--cm Link to post Share on other sites
Actuary 3 Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 What AF do you guys consider "standard"?Where do you draw the line between passive and aggressive?--cmI think below 1.5 is passive and above 2 is aggressive Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now