Jump to content

suited versus unsuited paint


Recommended Posts

I was just curious for people's feelings about how much higher they rank hands like KJ if they are suited versus not suited. In what situations do you throw away unsuited but keep suited? For me its mostly a factor of number of players in the pot for flush odds, but I'm curious as to how other people look at it...Ray

Link to post
Share on other sites

Abdullian logic says that in loose passive (no fold'em) limit games, big unsuited connectors (besides AK, AQ) are not worth anything because they could be dominated, but big suited connectors can be near nut hands and take down monster pots in those sort of games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends how many people normally see pots. If you have 10 players seeing pots, with a random hand you'll have 10% pot equity. Nut suitedness (like Axs or Kxs) gives you about a 3% to win with a flush. This increases your equity by a relatively huge margin (almost a third). However, if you're heads up, adding 3% to 50% is very minor.

Link to post
Share on other sites
It depends how many people normally see pots. If you have 10 players seeing pots, with a random hand you'll have 10% pot equity. Nut suitedness (like Axs or Kxs) gives you about a 3% to win with a flush. This increases your equity by a relatively huge margin (almost a third). However, if you're heads up, adding 3% to 50% is very minor.
This is why you might want to dump KTs from EP but play it from the Button when 5 have already limped into the pot. And about a brazillion other examples.see SSHE
Link to post
Share on other sites
suited hands have more value in limit games, full tables too. Stay away in Nl games, usually the "death" of many players.
I agree with this but I think you need to explain why...because you can draw cheaply in Limit.... and for the opposite reasons in NL you can play more lil pocket pairs
Link to post
Share on other sites

Disagree with the above post, suited connectors play very well in NL, especially with multiple players to a flop.High implied odds and easy to fold when they don't hit. Just regurgitating from SSH but over my last 40k hands, I would agree with Doyle's theory.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...