YBravo

I don't think any of the responses that Palin made were the result of ridiculously partisan questioning, they were things like "What political media do you pay attention to?" (she couldn't name a magazine or newspaper) and "Name a Supreme Court case other than Roe v. Wade where you feel like the judges overstepped their bounds." (she was super general and even said "cases like Roe v. Wade") I guess this can all just be written off as her being bad at interviews, but even if that's all it is, it's still a bad thing for her when that's her primary tool for communicating with voters.

shipped from The Stilt 13 (my PS screen name)

POKER HUMOR OVERLOAD

Nice cash man, sorry I missed it

whoa whoa whoa

UGH THE BEATS WHEN WILL THEY STOP?????

sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

well, with a hand like A2cc, you're looking to either get into a multi-way pot or a small HU pot. Flat-calling results in one or the other. Generally table dynamics determine what happens.

I don't know if it's necessarily a great reason to get upset, I just used the analogy to point out there is a difference between NNB talking about it and other people talking about it.

I think there's a difference between him talking about it and other people talking about it. I mean, if I was at a party and someone asked me how much I made, I would just tell them. However I think it would be pretty weird if that person then turned around and started telling everyone at the party how much I made. It's pretty nitty, but there's a difference.

fyp

RDog - So, b/c PMJ has no problem airing his financial situation publicly, NNB should have no problem either? If NNB doesn't want to talk about it and asks in a nice way, then why not respect that request?

gl, hope you get therebut grinder's probably right

http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/download/mac/