joshrogo

I can only imagine that this was the witty, thought provoking stuff daniel was hoping for when this forum began ..intelligent, lucid, poker discussion ...

2 other words ..He's Dead

i will be in vegas the 24th - 27th for NATPE

Count me among the people that care ..It is very interesting and informative to learn from someone else (books only give u so much insight) ..I admit I have never had the patience to play such small limits, but I would love to try the same experiment.Keep the updates coming!

thanks for the advic e .. as to the first response, i am not sure if i am damn good (but i guess i think i am ok) .. i appreciate the advice.

I wonder if some people have some thought on this ..I have been playing online a good deal lately and feel like my game is improving .. I mostly play $100 $1+2$ blinds NL on Party Poker ..I win with a good frequency and generally find the play pretty loose ..So, my question is this .. I played a $100+10 sit and go yesterday (to try to assess where my game is) and won easily (when i got to heads up, i had 3/4 of the chips and won heads up in 2 hands) .. This might lead me to believe I am better than I am .. I wonder .. What is a good barometer of assessing where my game is?

silly that this monkey gets any play at all -- i think we would all like to see him in our cash games ..

Josh ...As a fellow josh, i will say this ..I am also a very competitive person and I think to some extent that can explain your behaviour (at least what they selected and showed on ESPN), however, it by no means excuses it .. You are a husband and a father and as such have some semblance of responsibility to the people you love to treat others with the same respect you would want to them to treat you with .. I think the 2 worst examples (again, just what they showed on ESPN, were the bad beat on Harry ((a class player)) and your contempt for Raymer) ..I like the way you play and your style ov