Jam-Fly 8 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Ugh, just can't figure this out.Basically, lets say you are 50-1 to win a given tournament. You play these tournaments in groups of 4s. What are the odds you will win 3 of the tournaments, and not win the other?I'm sure it's really obvious but I just can't get an answer I feel is right Link to post Share on other sites
CBass1724 1 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 125,000 to 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Jam-Fly 8 Posted May 8, 2008 Author Share Posted May 8, 2008 125,000 to 1nah I don't think it is. That's winning 3 tournies in a row, but does not factor in the fourth in tournament in which I don't win. Link to post Share on other sites
CBass1724 1 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 I was just kidding anyway. I am really good at math but I don't have the slightest clue as how to begin answering this problem.122,500 to 1? Link to post Share on other sites
Suited_Up 2 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 0%trust me. Link to post Share on other sites
mx957 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Doesn't the standard 50% rule apply here?You either succeed or fail. 50/50. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 125000 to 1 to win 3 Link to post Share on other sites
dna4ever 2 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 am i the only one that is sure this is an elaborately set up brag post waiting to be delivered? Link to post Share on other sites
bbgun 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 <<<<<<Insert obligatory brazillion to 1 post here>>>>>> Link to post Share on other sites
Azwethinkweiz 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 125,000 to 1 to win 3 of the 4 tournaments.You're still 50 to 1 against winning the 4 tournament no matter how well or poor you did in the other three.So the odds you won't win the 4 tournament are 50 to 1. Link to post Share on other sites
copernicus 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 33,825:1 using the stated 50:1 (which != 1/50)If OP meant 49:1 which does = 1/50 then the answer is 31887:1For the latter its (1/50)^3 * 49/50 *4 because the losing tourney could be any one of the 4 Link to post Share on other sites
zimmer4141 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 125000 to 1 to win 3No, it isn't. By this logic if he had 1 million tries he's still 125000 to 1.It's kind of a tree problem. First tourney he wins 1/50 and loses 49/50. I think it's 4 * 49/(50^4), or 196/6,250,000 (.00003136) where 1/125,000 = (.000008) Link to post Share on other sites
bbgun 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Lots of confusing formulas and numbers...FYP Link to post Share on other sites
copernicus 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 No, it isn't. By this logic if he had 1 million tries he's still 125000 to 1.It's kind of a tree problem. First tourney he wins 1/50 and loses 49/50. I think it's 4 * 49/(50^4), or 196/6,250,000 (.00003136) where 1/125,000 = (.000008)GMTA Link to post Share on other sites
zimmer4141 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 FYPWell, he has to win 3 and lose 1, so it's (1/50)(1/50)(1/50)(49/50) because those are the probabilities of winning 3 and losing 1. He can lose any of the tournaments, so you multiply this by 4 because there are 4 possible combinations. Link to post Share on other sites
checkymcfold 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 33,825:1 using the stated 50:1 (which != 1/50)If OP meant 49:1 which does = 1/50 then the answer is 31887:1For the latter its (1/50)^3 * 49/50 *4 because the losing tourney could be any one of the 4this is correct. Link to post Share on other sites
Mercury69 3 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 No, it isn't. By this logic if he had 1 million tries he's still 125000 to 1.It's kind of a tree problem. First tourney he wins 1/50 and loses 49/50. I think it's 4 * 49/(50^4), or 196/6,250,000 (.00003136) where 1/125,000 = (.000008)Einstein cat has left teh buildingz Link to post Share on other sites
copernicus 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Einstein cat has left teh buildingzGood thing its Einsteins and not Schroediners cat..the box is open so there are no quantum issues any longer....in this universe anyway. Link to post Share on other sites
Suited_Up 2 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 33,825:1 using the stated 50:1 (which != 1/50)If OP meant 49:1 which does = 1/50 then the answer is 31887:1For the latter its (1/50)^3 * 49/50 *4 because the losing tourney could be any one of the 4 Link to post Share on other sites
davezz5 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 this is correct.Standard Link to post Share on other sites
Merby 3 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 Ugh, just can't figure this out.Basically, lets say you are 50-1 to win a given tournament. You play these tournaments in groups of 4s. What are the odds you will win 3 of the tournaments, and not win the other?I'm sure it's really obvious but I just can't get an answer I feel is rightI haven't read the other replies yet. I noticed that this thread already has two pages, so no doubt the correct answer has already been supplied.Nevertheless, here it is:1) Your odds of winning any one tournament is 50:1 or 1/51 = 0.0196...2) Hence your odds of losing any one tournament is 50/51 = 0.980...3) The outcome in any one tournament is independent of the outcome in the other three tournamentsTherefore, the final equation is:(1/51)*(1/51)*(1/51)*(50/51)*4 = 200/6,765,201So you will win exactly 3 out of a block of 4 tournaments 200 out of every 6.77 million attempts (or approximately 1 in every 33,826 times).Good luck! Link to post Share on other sites
Poker Addict 0 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 this thread already has two pagesYou need to increase the number of posts per page imo Link to post Share on other sites
Merby 3 Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 You need to increase the number of posts per page imoI'm well aware of that option, but ...<--- Too lazy to change that option.<--- Feels that the two best words of the english language are "DE" and "FAULT"^^^ Above are the two fundamental reasons why I have not changed my preferences from the default settings ^^^ Link to post Share on other sites
Jam-Fly 8 Posted October 22, 2009 Author Share Posted October 22, 2009 Came across another problem similar to this recently. My friend was playing roulette and was betting on four numbers only on each spin. In 10 spins, one of his four numbers came up 6 of the ten times.Using what I think is the correct formula, it was(4 / 37) * (4 / 37) * (4 / 37) * (4 / 37) * (4 / 37) * (4 / 37) * (33 / 37) * (33 / 37) * (33 / 37) * (33 / 37) * 10 = 1.0101793 × 10-5 likely for this to happen? This is almost 100,000-1, yes? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now