As usual, the devil is in the details.For instance, if the WPT has a clause that says a player's likeness can be used to promote the WPT TV show, then I think most reasonable people would have no problem with that.However, if the WPT goes on to make non-TV show related products, such as video games, instructional videos, etc, and are saying they own the players' likeness for such products for ever and ever, then I think most reasonable people would say that's over the top and should not be allowed.So what are the details of that clause?People are arguing the merits of a case on here where pro