coug2828

maybe hitler executes cruise at the end. that would be ok

1) Ari2) Drama3) Turtle4) Lloyd5) Walsh6) Shawna7) Vince8) E26) Dom

anyone excited for this? the Tom Cruise movie where he plays a nazi with an eye patch organizing a plot to kill Hitler. normally this sort of thing would be right up my alley, but i have my doubts about this one.1) the eye patch...really, is that necessary?2) cruise speaks perfect english, but he's a nazi. not even an attempt at a german accent. just like Kevin Costner in that Robin Hood movie, and that movie was horrible.

why wasn't daniel part of the original FTP lineup? seems like he would have been a natural choice considering so many of his buddies are involved

anyone betting on the de la hoya fight tonight? i got a few bucks on pacquio

new england -6.5 at seattle is a mortal lock this week. seahawks are missing three starting offensive linemen(possibly 4, walter jones is questionable) and hasselbeck is doubtful.

right, that's what i thought...when i first read your post i interpretted it as "except for the 2"...my mistake.

i'm quite new to o8(and new to the forum) so bear with me here...the part of your comment here that says "other than the 2 obv", does this mean you like or dislike the 2? i would think the 2 is ideal on the turn or river, just a little confused i guess.

i read this the other day and decided to give Pot limit omaha high/low a shot, i was getting a bit bored or complacent with hold em. i had played very little omaha before and found it really enjoyable, so much more to think about and process, hands to try and read etc. thanks jmbreslin, it was invigorating. and amazingly i ended up winning the first $1.00 sng i entered for a nice profit of $3.30

in...my first private tourney through fcp

that article mentioned a "former world champion" being involved in the UB scandal. anyone know who they're referring to?

?? did i say something to offend? maybe this is an old topic or something and my original question had been rehashed on numerous threads, i don't know. just wondered what other people thought about the various sites/complaints

so basically the complaints are just the whiners then. i pretty much assumed this to be the case, but i always wondered why if "this site sucks", then why don't they go to one that doesn't. thanks everyone

yeah i guess so...i'm a fairly frequent reader, but a lousy poster i guess

i mainly play at pokerstars and i notice an inordinate amount of people complaining..."this site sucks" "jokerstars" types of comments, mostly about being on the receiving end of a bad beat i guess. so i'm wondering if there are strong opinions out there one way or the other if certain sites are better or whatever. ie, are there less bad beats/river suckouts on full tilt? or is it just complaining because someone got beat?thanks for your feedback.