Jump to content

TCTC

Members
  • Content Count

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About TCTC

  • Rank
    Poker Forum Newbie
  1. Fencer if you do get paid tomorrow and u can post that in this thread I would appreciate it. I have never had a problem cashing out nor has Cindy. But tomorrow/Friday it will be 2 weeks waiting for FedEx.It just worries me that all this cashout/deposit stuff has hit the fan in the past 2 weeks and then this cashout has turned into a problem.I dont usually overreact, but I would be lying if I said it hasnt entered my mind that there could be a bigger problem here and that the timing of this delay isnt simply a coincidence.Hopefully, they are just adjusting to the new laws and regualtions and
  2. LOL Outsider13.........I dont know what would be worse since I am a guy...........Being a guy with 120k but having Cindy for a name or having a guys name but not 120k.....I think I will stick with my name less the cash.........But yeah the guy was totally frustrating to listen to online since he wasnt making much sense. Also they were no better on the phone.mtdesmoines please come back on in the next week or so and add a reply to this post if you do get paid and I will do the same if/or we get paid on this end.thanxTCTC
  3. Let me add one more thing.Yes, I know patience is a virtue, but with all the other cashouts that Cindy or I have ever made we have received the check via FedEx within a couple of days. We have never had any problems before.This cashout has been going on almost 2 weeks. There is no way FedEx takes 2 weeks. Also, this is the first cashout for either one of us within the past month. The past month/few weeks has seen a flurry of activity in regards to many companies no longer accepting US players trying to cashout or trying to make deposits.Hopefully it has nothing to do with all the stuff goi
  4. If you read my past posts I am not one to spew nonsense and I know this topic has been discussed in the past week, but I thought I would post this chat.I thought a few posters on here from the US like partypsux, hoosier, etc. were getting carried away with their worries about cashouts and the sky is falling with all the new legislation. I thought hoosier was going on and on and worrying about nothing.I always figured that the poker and sportsbook sites that were the biggest and that had been around the longest would still thrive. I thought that they were stable enough and wouldnt risk a grea
  5. Thanx for all the interesting praise and sarcasm, I enjoyed both.As far as ever getting the Cliffs Notes version from me, there is literally NO CHANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Unless someone is willing to let me email my posts so they can edit them first. I seem to like redundancy, lol.I try my best to not put any of you to sleep. As far as my posts being +EV, lol, good luck with that. But, if I have anything to add, I will try to post more instead of just being a lurker. To answer TB.......We let AC play because none of us cared, I mean we are not the poker police, if the casino lets him in who are
  6. My opinion on Allen Cunningham (AC), is based on playing with him in the PL game at Hollywood Park from about '97 until the early 2000's.....Alot of the younger guys on here might not now it, but back in the 90s before the internet pokker boom there where no PL or NL games to be found anywhere. I am only in my 30s, and being a poker player now feels like being spoiled.Back in the 90's the only place in LA, Vegas, AC, or Foxwoods that had a regular NL or PL holdem game was Hollywood Park. Yes, Hollywood Park, as hard as that is to believe considering what a beauty of a casino it is today. Li
  7. Ahhh the morning or should I say the afternoon after a night of too much spiked eggnog!!!!! Nothing like 15 hours in bed to cure it.To all the posters that responded to my post in this thread. I appreciate the fact that agreed and disagreed with my comments and spent the time to explain why. Perhaps I shouldnt have posted at all, but I was had just gotten home and was trying to kill some time before bed. I just grew frustrated with some of the BS is all. Like I said, it was just a small percentage of BS like usual, but for some reason it aggravated me.I understand we all post some worthl
  8. Hey there,Let me first say that I hope everyone had a great holiday. Then let me say this is going to be a long, long, long post.I can't believe I am going to engage in a flame war with some of you, but I just can't help myself. Some of the stuff I read in this thread is just disguting. Some of it is a total disgrace.Since I know it will be coming from some of the "smart" posters on here, let me say please feel free to flame away at me. Not that you need my permission. When I say "smart", I am referring to the posters with the quick and witty replies that offer nothing of substance.I am s
  9. This one seems easy.Vanessa Rousso wins this one easily for the best.Jennicide takes up the gutter.TCTC
  10. This is the toughest one so far.I'd have to put Erick Lindgren at the top with John Juanda and Todd Brunson close.I'd say Chris Ferguson would be the worst of this group.TCTC
  11. I would say in this group you would have to put Johnny Chan at the top.Scotty Nguyen would be at the bottom.TCTC
  12. I definitely think JC Tran is far and away the best player in this group and I dont think it is even close. The other 4 are battling for the gutter. If I had to choose just one for the worst it would be Phil Gordon.I dont know if it is just me and maybe I am blinded by my hatred for his "tv antics", but I think alot of you are seriously over-estimating Phil Laak.I just think Laak has little skill and no moves at all at NL. I just dont see it at all with him. Like I said I could be blinded since I cant really stand the clown.TCTC
  13. Just one more thing that I meant to add for Al Smooth. I wish you the best and hopefully you will do well. You seem to be looking for feedback and open to constructive criticism.Just listen to what Checky has said about making assumptions to quickly. I can promise you that if even if it was only a semi-decent player that made that move at a cost of only 1-2BB he has you where he wants you.You quickly posting about him being a "donk" and why you loved 50-100. He may well have been a "donk", but you said you based him being a "donk" on this play and the fact you had him data-mined for a few
  14. I like the discussion and most of the comments.I dont mean to go off topic momentarily.I just want to give Checky credit for trying to explain his reasoning and doing so in a professional manner. Meaning that even thugh a few disagreed with him he didnt get offended like alot of people do and start spewing out insults.Good to see a topic debated by adults.I used to play alot of mid-to-high limit short-handed holdem, but now its mostly full ring no-limit. So my comments will be based on having some experience in the game.First, let me say that we dont really know much about either player, so
  15. Joey,Good luck to you with the O/8. Its a fun game to play and it can be a very profitable game.Most 0/8 players, especially at the smaller limits, like to gamble and play alot of hands. If you know what you are doing, you can do well.As far as you being flamed, you have a good atitude. Like some of the other posters have said, some guys on here have nothing better to do with their time, but be sarcastic asses. The main jackass being "Stealfromblind." Whenever I read through a topic and he has posted in it, it is always the same BS from him flaming someone. Amazing that this guy has noth
×
×
  • Create New...