goose 0 Posted March 20, 2006 Share Posted March 20, 2006 I read Case for Faith last summer, and while I thought it very poorly written (to the point of almost insulting the reader's intelligence), it did raise a lot of interesting explanations and arguments for various traditional critiques of Christianity. It didn't convert me by any stretch, but it spun a new light on some of the issues.For those of you who have read both Case for Christ and Case for Faith, which do you believe is better, and if I've read Case for Faith, is it worth it to read Case for Christ or are the books very close in content? Link to post Share on other sites
Mattnxtc 0 Posted March 20, 2006 Share Posted March 20, 2006 I read Case for Faith last summer, and while I thought it very poorly written (to the point of almost insulting the reader's intelligence), it did raise a lot of interesting explanations and arguments for various traditional critiques of Christianity. It didn't convert me by any stretch, but it spun a new light on some of the issues.For those of you who have read both Case for Christ and Case for Faith, which do you believe is better, and if I've read Case for Faith, is it worth it to read Case for Christ or are the books very close in content?content is very different. I enjoyed A Case for Faith mainly b/c if you look through these threads you see those very questions answered. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now