dapokerbum 0 Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 solid bet imoWould be +EV with the books anyways ...Top 10 MoneylineTiger Woods -175Phil Mickelson -175Lee Westwood -110Ernie Els +225Padraig Harrington +225Rory McIlroy +175Jim Furyk +225Luke Donald +225Doesn't the negative number mean that he is a favorite to make the top 10? Link to post Share on other sites
dna4ever 2 Posted June 16, 2010 Author Share Posted June 16, 2010 Doesn't the negative number mean that he is a favorite to make the top 10?oh i totally read your OP wrong, thought you said wouldn't finish out of the top 10Yeah, that is a horrible bet. Definitely going to be in the top 10. Link to post Share on other sites
dna4ever 2 Posted June 16, 2010 Author Share Posted June 16, 2010 it should be disclaimed that ANYTIME i say 'definitely' about anything related to an outcome of an event, its 99.9% wrong so nice bet Link to post Share on other sites
dapokerbum 0 Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 it should be disclaimed that ANYTIME i say 'definitely' about anything related to an outcome of an event, its 99.9% wrong so nice betWoot? Link to post Share on other sites
fleung22 1 Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 solid bet imoWould be +EV with the books anyways ...Top 10 MoneylineTiger Woods -175Phil Mickelson -175Lee Westwood -110Ernie Els +225Padraig Harrington +225Rory McIlroy +175Jim Furyk +225Luke Donald +225These are all such +++EV for the bookies. It's pretty ridiculous that any golfer, including Tiger, gets you less than 1-1 on your bet. Link to post Share on other sites
dna4ever 2 Posted June 18, 2010 Author Share Posted June 18, 2010 Neither Phil nor Tiger managed even one birdie between them in round 1 ....T1 | Shaun Micheel | -2 | 69T1 | Paul Casey | -2 | 69T1 | Brendon de Jonge | -2 | 69T4 | Alex Cejka | -1 | 70T4 | Ryo Ishikawa | -1 | 70T4 | Rafael Cabrera Bello | -1 | 70T4 | K.J. Choi | -1 | 70T4 | Mike Weir | -1 | 70T4 | Ian Poulter | -1 | 70T10 | Graeme McDowell | E | 71T10 | Dustin Johnson | E | 71T10 | Luke Donald | E | 71T10 | David Toms | E | 71T14 | Jerry Kelly | 1 | 72T14 | Kenny Perry | 1 | 72T14 | Jason Allred | 1 | 72T14 | Bo Van Pelt | 1 | 72T14 | Soren Kjeldsen | 1 | 72T14 | Zach Johnson | 1 | 72T14 | Hiroyuki Fujita | 1 | 72T14 | Jim Furyk | 1 | 72T14 | Tim Clark | 1 | 72T14 | Justin Leonard | 1 | 72T14 | Scott Verplank | 1 | 72T14 | Ricky Barnes | 1 | 72T14 | Jason Dufner | 1 | 72T14 | Ross McGowan | 1 | 72T14 | Matt Bettencourt | 1 | 72T29 | Pablo Martin | 2 | 73T29 | Sergio Garcia | 2 | 73T29 | Ernie Els | 2 | 73T29 | Peter Hanson | 2 | 73T29 | Miguel Jimenez | 2 | 73T29 | Matthew Richardson | 2 | 73T29 | Russell Henley | 2 | 73T29 | Steve Marino | 2 | 73T29 | Gregory Havret | 2 | 73T29 | Toru Taniguchi | 2 | 73T29 | Stuart Appleby | 2 | 73T29 | Padraig Harrington | 2 | 73T29 | Y.E. Yang | 2 | 73T29 | David Frost | 2 | 73T29 | Lucas Glover | 2 | 73T29 | Craig Barlow | 2 | 73T29 | Hugo Leon | 2 | 73T29 | Kent Jones | 2 | 73T47 | Steve Wheatcroft | 3 | 74T47 | Gareth Maybin | 3 | 74T47 | John Rollins | 3 | 74T47 | Noh Seung-yul | 3 | 74T47 | Tiger Woods | 3 | 74T47 | Lee Westwood | 3 | 74T47 | Vijay Singh | 3 | 74T47 | Charl Schwartzel | 3 | 74T47 | Fred Funk | 3 | 74T47 | Martin Kaymer | 3 | 74T47 | Ross Fisher | 3 | 74T47 | Azuma Yano | 3 | 74T47 | Erick Justesen | 3 | 74T47 | Stephen Ames | 3 | 74T47 | Rory Sabbatini | 3 | 74T47 | Robert Allenby | 3 | 74T47 | Matt Kuchar | 3 | 74T47 | Trevor Immelman | 3 | 74T47 | Thongchai Jaidee | 3 | 74T66 | Morgan Hoffmann | 4 | 75T66 | Jean-Francois Lucquin | 4 | 75T66 | David Duval | 4 | 75T66 | Steve Stricker | 4 | 75T66 | Ryan Moore | 4 | 75T66 | Davis Love III | 4 | 75T66 | Rory McIlroy | 4 | 75T66 | Oliver Wilson | 4 | 75T66 | Brandt Snedeker | 4 | 75T66 | Heath Slocum | 4 | 75T66 | Scott Langley | 4 | 75T66 | Jason Preeo | 4 | 75T66 | Mikko Ilonen | 4 | 75T66 | Charles Warren | 4 | 75T66 | Edoardo Molinari | 4 | 75T66 | Retief Goosen | 4 | 75T66 | Angel Cabrera | 4 | 75T66 | Phil Mickelson | 4 | 75 Link to post Share on other sites
dna4ever 2 Posted June 21, 2010 Author Share Posted June 21, 2010 oh i totally read your OP wrong, thought you said wouldn't finish out of the top 10Yeah, that is a horrible bet. Definitely going to be in the top 10.whoa, got one right, sorry about your luck, I'm usually pretty bad at betting ... 1 Graeme McDowell E 71 68 71 74 284 $1,350,000 2 Gregory Havret +1 73 71 69 72 285 $810,000 3 Ernie Els +2 73 68 72 73 286 $480,687T4 Tiger Woods +3 74 72 66 75 287 $303,119T4 Phil Mickelson +3 75 66 73 73 287 $303,119Pretty sick that Tiger only had to shoot a 71/72 to win/tie the final round and boinked off a 75 after shooting a 72 and amazing 66 the previous two days. Link to post Share on other sites
dapokerbum 0 Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 whoa, got one right, sorry about your luck, I'm usually pretty bad at betting ... 1 Graeme McDowell E 71 68 71 74 284 $1,350,000 2 Gregory Havret +1 73 71 69 72 285 $810,000 3 Ernie Els +2 73 68 72 73 286 $480,687T4 Tiger Woods +3 74 72 66 75 287 $303,119T4 Phil Mickelson +3 75 66 73 73 287 $303,119Pretty sick that Tiger only had to shoot a 71/72 to win/tie the final round and boinked off a 75 after shooting a 72 and amazing 66 the previous two days.After his 66 I thought for sure he was going to just win the thing ... but then the new tiger crept up and bit him. The guy can still play some impressive golf! I am calling it right now that he wins the British Open. Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,752 Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showb...vorce-deal.html Link to post Share on other sites
FCP Bob 1,312 Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showb...vorce-deal.htmlThat's an awful lot of money going to his wife.Just shows how much he must have to begin with. Link to post Share on other sites
dna4ever 2 Posted July 21, 2010 Author Share Posted July 21, 2010 First he has to give all that money to his wife now this!!! Oh man, he is going to be broke soon .....July 21st, 2010 APNEW YORK - Tiger Woods' estimated endorsements for 2010 are worth $22 million less than last year, according to Sports Illustrated's annual analysis of the highest-earning American athletes.Woods is still No. 1 on the list, as he has been for the rankings' seven years. But his estimated total annual earnings of more than $90 million are down 30 percent from nearly $128 million two years ago.Poor guy, we should take up a collection or something to help him through this rough financial stretch Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 First he has to give all that money to his wife now this!!! Oh man, he is going to be broke soon .....July 21st, 2010 APNEW YORK - Tiger Woods' estimated endorsements for 2010 are worth $22 million less than last year, according to Sports Illustrated's annual analysis of the highest-earning American athletes.Woods is still No. 1 on the list, as he has been for the rankings' seven years. But his estimated total annual earnings of more than $90 million are down 30 percent from nearly $128 million two years ago.Poor guy, we should take up a collection or something to help him through this rough financial stretchHow is he gonna live on $90 million..??Goes to show you the strength of the brand...He goes thru all that and still raking in the money. Link to post Share on other sites
digitalmonkey 929 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 How is he gonna live on $90 million..??Goes to show you the strength of the brand...He goes thru all that and still raking in the money.What kind of mortgage would he be approved for with an annual salary of $90 million? Link to post Share on other sites
serge 904 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 What kind of mortgage would he be approved for with an annual salary of $90 million?Around $350 to $400 million Link to post Share on other sites
dapokerbum 0 Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 Tiger is really out of sorts, I expect him to make a comeback next year, but we'll see.How about that ruling on Dustin Johnson. Sucks to be him, but he should have read the rules. Apprently there was a sheet that went out telling them specifically about this type of thing. There really is no one to blame but himself. I really don't understand how people don't get that. They are saying that this is a bad call, but IMO it was a great call and he will learn from this and have many wins in his future! That guy can hit it a mile and he has a great short game. Link to post Share on other sites
brvheart 1,752 Posted August 25, 2010 Share Posted August 25, 2010 http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/elin-n...ory?id=11473930 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now