PhilHellmuth

*sigh* [previous was really gonna be the last one, hopefully this will be]u could call it wanting attention if u'd like. i do feel the need for people to know the reason i left, as it is the one thing i feel is bad about FCP. the irony is that i think if u were objective, i think u'd probably agree with nearly every word i wrote, but since ur not, and ppl like DM are the ones who will continue to hit the site, its hardly surpising which side u'd take.

interesting u should say that.i made the following post during my worst downswing ever, at a time where i was in genuine need of empathy. http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat...&fpart=all&vc=1compare those responses with some of the ones i may have gotten here.

thanks.my name at 2+2 is uter, with this avatar - the only reason it was PH here is cuz i originally created the account solely to write posts that make fun of phil.

the strat section is good, but what i'd liked about FCP was the personality of it and the general poker discussion, and that was mostly in general. u'd have to admit that 2+2 is quite a good resource for strategy.[yes i know i said it was my last post....oh well]

i had no intention of making a goodbye post but then i decided to anyway. the reason i left is because a few of the 'vets' often made this an unpleasant place to be. one such 'vet' ripped a post which happened to be a good post and his ripping was completely dumb and nonsensical. when i called him out on it, his dumb 'vet' buddies started ripping me [even while acknowledging that my point was right] while there is no doubt that if a newb had made the same dumb post that this supposed 'vet' did, they all would've ripped the shit out of the guy.in my world, just cuz u have a 3000+ post count, d

You want a message? I'll give ya a message.Your crusade against people with high post counts is stupid. You look stupid doing it. Typically--though not always--people with high post counts have contributed to this forum--YOU haven't.Quite frankly? I couldn't give a shit less what you or your little band of tards thinks or says. I've contributed more in the last twenty minutes to this forum then you have ever. Trust me, I've never flamed anyone for a well thought out, intelligent, based-in-reality, post.I'm sorry that you seem to react so angrily when people disagree with you--example; me not s

Not thinking before you post > Not thinking while you postdm, i was amused that someone today finally had the balls to echo a lot of ppl's sentiments that many of ur posts flaming ppl are worthless and inappropriate. u dont seem to have gotten the message, but thats not very surprising.

i'll take u each as u come. i'll say it as many times as i have to - i dont give a fck what ur postcount is. if u talk sht to a guy who made a good point and ur the one who's wrong i will stand up for the guy. go find a +1 thread in off topic u loser

It makes no sense in the context of what he's saying. Anyways...I misunderstood.As for my post for hellmuth, by that point I realized I made a mistake. I was just trying to annoy him because (as we all know) he's a tool...and apparently it worked because he got all fired up. I was going to keep baiting him, but since you guys were cool enough to stick up for me I just figured I'd say what happened and move on.1 - at least u could admit u were wrong. 2 - if ur going to make up a story [that ur post was just to bait me] at least make sure it sounds slightly plausible. nobody believes ur bulls

who are u, the topic police? so fkn petty its unbelievable.*sigh* im pretty sure he was being sardonic in the wake of the thread moving controversy.i guess we hav to bring back the 'sw'edit: i could be wrong tho

Not sure what you are saying I did not deny; but, my Avitar had been the Calculator for a long time. Then I would swap between Calculator and Hot Chick, depending on whether I was at work or not.The HotChick, as I stated back on that thread, was there well before your accusation.Anyway, wait a minute, are you saying the avitar someone picks is relevant in some way?why am I defending thisedit to add: I also use food and Speed Racernotice btw that actuary continues to not deny that he's a loser who's never gotten any.LMAO. just noticed the avatar. im sorry that i reminded you that ur a loser. m

It makes no sense in the context of what he's saying. Anyways...I misunderstood.As for my post for hellmuth, by that point I realized I made a mistake. I was just trying to annoy him because (as we all know) he's a tool...and apparently it worked because he got all fired up. I was going to keep baiting him, but since you guys were cool enough to stick up for me I just figured I'd say what happened and move on.1 - at least u could admit u were wrong. 2 - if ur going to make up a story [that ur post was just to bait me] at least make sure it sounds slightly plausible. nobody believes ur bulls

my dilemna: actuary is a pitty case whose avatar was a calculator until the very day i pointed out that he was a loser who's never gotten any. since that day until now his avatars have been hot girls to try and cover up that fact, which by the way, he never even tried to deny.i dont know speedz from adam. if he is a logical person, then dont fcking jump in and tell someone that what they wrote makes no sense, when it made perfect sense, and what you wrote was nonsensical and contributed nothing. actuary even admits that speedz was off the ball on this one. im not trying to start any wars with

You failed to understand pokerkid's post, my post, and I have a feeling you don't even know what the hell you just wrote. Do you see why you're an idiot? I bet you don't.Yikes.wow, you're one of those people who says things with a lot of conviction, yet is completely logically impaired. and the tragedy of it is that whatever it is in your brain that made you like this will prevent you from understanding as usual. i have one or two people like you in my life and dealing with them is always a struggle. i feel bad for the ones that have to deal with you.there was nothing complicated about poker

Uh...the way you compare the competition is by looking at the same game/same limit in both mediums.aside: is medium the correct term there?So, you see, while you were making a good attempt at outwitting everyone involved in the argument...you actually made the least amount of sense. It is very possible to say which game is easier to beat for any given level (live or online). The answer is "live" probably up until 100/200 when it becomes fairly indestiguishable...I could be wrong about that exact limit where it shifts, though.pokerkid's post made complete sense. all he was saying is that ppl

lmao. im shocked they havent moved this to off topic yet

i dunno man, i think the queens are a little hotter than the aces, altho a couple of the jacks are pretty hot. that one-eye thing is pretty sexy

i hope u've enjoyed ur time here aces.now bring on the dancing ban......[what?]

I just stopped laughing...Limit Poker is about as even online as it is in person.There are three choices call, raise one unit or fold.If you wanted to talk about NL where online folks have an itchy all in finger...ok, but limit? Come on.I agree that there are significant differences. Heck there are differences in how people play NL on the East coast vs. West coast vs. Europe.In the end, cards are cards and your ability to make good decisions is what makes you a good or bad player. Not the medium used to play the game.i just stopped laughing......at you.go to a casino, play at a 2-4 game, se

the problem here is that i think most people only look in general. they dont have time to go looking in every nook of the forum, that would take all day. thus when a thread is made about the new 90 person SNG at this and this site, or the new structures at party, etc. they should be left in general so people can see them. cuz general is where people go, like it or not.certainly without a doubt, the oh by the way thread should not be moved out of general. we sholdnt have to explain why anymore. it should be obvious

i was gonna make this thread myself.i agree with this 100%.mods - we love u, we know ur trying to do ur job, but please take this to heart.

.............most live players are better than online players.this is complete utter bullsht. perhaps u've failed to notice that the online pros have completely infiltrated the poker world. darrel dicken, nick schulman, ozzy, josh schlein, and daniel larsson, are only a few of the online pros that have made WPT final tables recently. they're also all over the live games.what do we think the OP's biggest problem probably is?what is the #1 problem of most losing players? any guesses?they play too many fcking hands, and they dont fold them soon enough after the flop. you really think that if he c

.............most live players are better than online players.this is complete utter bullsht. perhaps u've failed to notice that the online pros have completely infiltrated the poker world. darrel dicken, nick schulman, ozzy, josh schlein, and daniel larsson, are only a few of the online pros that have made WPT final tables recently. they're also all over the live games.what do we think the OP's biggest problem probably is?what is the #1 problem of most losing players? any guesses?they play too many fcking hands, and they dont fold them soon enough after the flop. you really think that if he c

crazy pineapple