I don't love them. I think they are straddling a line between casual and dress, but in a bad way, that they are neither dressy enough to wear professionally, nor cool enough to wear casually. They are probably fine for business casual work environments, but really they scream old guy cool to me, like something an old dude would wear with his "flashy" sweater vest to go to the Shrine meeting in his corvette.
i have to assume you came in here with that weak shit, if serious, because you know that any discussion of the kavanaugh allegations will find you roasted alive by the facts. the entire process, to quote two supreme court justices, was a circus, a national disgrace. 85% of the media was complicit in trumping up baseless, fraudulent allegations because they donít like the way SCJBK interprets the law. from the very beginning democrats and the left media were in hysterics over his nomination and the actions of the last three weeks were an extension of those hysterics.
so no, sir, you are the stereotype. a stereotype of a moron who canít think for himself.
Hey SA, I finally saw they new M.I. installment, and I get your enthusiasm now. That was a total BMW movie, start to finish. They even packed Ving Rhames into an E30. I'm sorry I doubted my BMW brother.
This is looking worse and worse for the dems. They have the information in July, but purposely sit on it. Then they trot out 3 women that all have incredibly weak stories that no one would believe, and expect everyone to fall for it?
This is really hurting actual victims of sexual assault. That's the worst part about this nonsense.
This latest woman's big claim was that she didn't remember a single person at the party except for Kavanaugh and Judge and that they didn't rape her but that they were present at the party where it happened. (https://www.mediaite...inst-kavanaugh/)
All this, because Stormy Daniels' lawyer wanted more attention and the dems want to act like they are victims. This is the lowest form of stooping I've ever witnessed. It's corrupt and evil. You could make a claim that Merrick Garland's situation wasn't fair, but the GOP never set out to destroy the guy's life. I never heard a single negative thing about him personally.
SuitedAces21, on 18 September 2018 - 05:04 AM, said:
i'm unfamiliar with that game, but there would have been no variance in what cards came out that winning hand? every hand has exactly the same amount of cards so his playing only brought it out sooner and stole it from you had you been alone?
Because they use a freshly shuffled deck each hand when he sat at the table he was getting "my hand" and I was getting "the dealer hand" and the dealer was getting a fresh hand. Once I dropped out he was still getting "my hand" and the dealer went back to getting their own.
Sometimes I'm just riffing. Can I riff? CAN I RIFF?
Napa_Don, on 18 September 2018 - 06:11 AM, said:
I love 3 card poker. J high or better and I'm playing it out. Can be extremely swingy though. At least I think I think I'm thinking of 3 card.
dealer qualifies with Q high which means if you beat the Q high you get paid on both the ante and the play bets. if they don't qualify you only get paid on the ante bet. not sure why you would play J high...if there is a mathematical strategy to that let me know. usually i'm just chasing a set (or higher) to get that 30 to 1 pay out. i'll play my QJ or maybe Q10 and if I see an ace in the door and I don't even look at the other 2 cards.