I like to take the winner of the WSOP Main Event and compare it to the US Open or Masters in golf. The winner of these "Majors" is not neccessarily the best player in the world but much like the WSOP, you do not often get unskilled players winning when it is all said and done. Therefore my vote is "NO" it does not answer the question of the best player.With respects to the post about too many entrants and a minimal buy-in... the WSOP Main Event is the one big reason for the explosion in the poker world as it has allowed for "normal, blue collar workers" to take a stab at the big pot. Without
