bdc30

Sorry all,see crosspost in strategy :wink:

Just thought I would post a hand that I played a few weeks ago at the Windsor Casino in the $1-2 (100 max buy-in) No Limit game. I'm on the button with J K Table has been playing fairly tight, not many raises most of the night. 5 people before me limp in, as do I, and the blinds call and check. Flop comes 9 10 Q Perfect flop for my hand, sort of.... Second position bets $10, two players fold, one calls and I raise it to $30 to go. BB calls, as does the original bettor. Turn brings Q Uh oh.... BB bets out $20, second player calls, I call. (question 1 - should I have raised her

Just thought I would post a hand that I played a few weeks agoat the Windsor Casino in the $1-2 (100 max buy-in) No Limit game.I'm on the button with J K Table has been playing fairly tight, not many raises most of the night.5 people before me limp in, as do I, and the blinds call and check.Flop comes 9 10 Q Perfect flop for my hand, sort of....Second position bets $10, two players fold, one callsand I raise it to $30 to go. BB calls, as does the original bettor.Turn brings Q Uh oh....BB bets out $20, second player calls, I call.(question 1 - should I have raised here, or gone all in?

The thing I like about his call pre-flopis that the guy who made the raise wasalso the guy acting all c0cky after probablytaking down the previous pot on some drawagainst a player likely superior to him.Paying a dollar to see a flop with suitedconnectors isn't a terrible idea, just in case the flophits you perfect, like it did in this case. If it doesn't,then it only cost you a dollar, but if it does, it's evensweeter to take out a player like that. Kinda like Hellmuthsays in his book "invest a toothpick to win a lumberyard"

Is it just me, or is Barry not being "too honest with his frank opinionsabout other players" ???

The Score is a Canadian Cable TV channelLooks like you're outta luck T

Although I see your point Aces, take it easy on Chuck.Gambling, in any form, is not ALWAYS a victimless crime.It has its evils, the same way alcohol or drug addiction does.Just because YOU are not being victimized, doesn't mean thatthere are NO victims. I don't think Chuck was incinuating that you were part of a violent or criminal organization, he was just stating factual informationon what the nature of the law is.