DaculaJones

117 days is a long time for anything to happen. Anything.My sarcastic comment was in the context that the "new" idea has a big time window to backfire in a big way.

Wouldn't this be great:117 days for the 9 players to work out a chop........No broadcast...lol

imo.....This is a BAD idea.To only shorten the outcome window from 117 days to 1 day?Most "Poker" viewers who have any media sources will know the outcome before airing anyway.I can't believe CardPlayer and Bluff and others are going to keep wraps on this before the broadcast.The only way this format works is to do it live. PokerDome style.Does this mean there's not going to be a final table pay-per-view broadcast this year?Anyone with above averge poker knowledge can still follow whats going on without having to see hole cards during a live pay-per-view broadcast. In fact ,it's a great chal